Itsmyshow
Moderator
- Moderator
- #901
It was possibly harder to umpire a game in those conditions than to play.. speaking to another umpire on the day, one would see a free kick and in some cases the reaction to get to the whistle in time was a heck of a lot slower because it was that darn cold, a bit going on in the packs, that was hard to see because it was harder to physically get into position, slower brand of footy.. you make the great point that there was nothing wrong the standard of umpiring in all other games.. the players skills may not have been that flash, like wise with the umpires and the conditions didn't help.. I umpired two at Romsey and I rate them as the two worst I'll ever do, it was a battle to be out on the park.. but all in all, good opinion.. lets hope we see some great conditions this weekend with a fantastic brand of football to boot.
Yep, completely understand that difficult conditions can add to the difficulties in umpiring the contest... But the 50/50 decisions etc are not the issue.. How can this best be put without having people think that I am saying an umpire cheated, because it is not what I believe.. What I believe is, that one of the two sides on the weekend were umpired differently to the opposition side, by one umpire in particular. I believe interpretation changed from one decision to another and it happened in situations where the contest was irrelevant to the decision making process, one on one contests where a different decision was paid when the same situation had occured prior or following. Again, it is only my assessment of the match and not to discredit Centrals at all either, but what I saw from the game was, that without certain decisions, then Centrals would have been restricted to one goal for the afternoon.