FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
Is there anything worse than people going into a thread that is specifically labeled and complaining about the topic at hand being discussed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes, posters who do it and claim to know what makes some feel better.Is there anything worse than people going into a thread that is specifically labeled and complaining about the topic at hand being discussed?
Dawson was not worth pick four when the trade was done. Dangerfield was worth more than the pick we got and the henderson pick when the trade was done. There’s no comparison.Its not the footballer its the deal. So its ok for Sydney lol but not ok for us.......right!!!
You didn't answer the question though!It’s a football forum and football old and new is discussed, especially in the off season. It’s not up to you to determine what we should and shouldn’t discuss especially when there’s a dedicated thread.
To insinuate we need to argue to feel better is pathetic. Do you post to feel better? What’s the threshold of when posting makes us feel better. Also feel to share your shrink credentials
Why are you in the thread? It baffles me that posters would whinge about a topic when they can just ignore it, especially when they post in that thread!
Because I like to discuss topics especially if I find an opposing view I disagree with. It’s a football forum, we discuss football related topics.You didn't answer the question though!
Why do you often post the same point over & over?
Do you think all posters have short term memory loss?
If you don't do it to make yourself feel better, why then?
Yes, I post here for enjoyment, otherwise why be here...
Yes we know full well this is a discussion board.Because I like to discuss topics especially if I find an opposing view I disagree with. It’s a football forum, we discuss football related topics.
You argue on here, do you do it to make yourself feel better?
Do you feel better coming into a thread and whinging about the topic and insulting posters?
I did answer, you just didn’t like the answer.Yes we know full well this is a discussion board.
But my question is why the need to make the same point over & over?
It's insulting to think we are all too stupid to remember what you posted previously.
Clearly you are refusing to answer & I won't bother asking again.
Is there anything worse than people going into a thread that is specifically labeled and complaining about the topic at hand being discussed?
You think posters post on here and enter into arguments to feel better? That’s a weird take and insulting
Or the way they contradict themselves throughout the topic!Is there anything worse than people going into a thread that is specifically labeled and complaining about the topic at hand being discussed?
Did he actually use the sit out for a year threat?We should have called Dangerfield’s bluff. He would never sit out a year. We are weak as a club, always have been.
Even if it meant losing any trade it would have sent a message to the rest of the competition.
s**t deal.
Also, Rehn doing his knees 3 times was s**t.
Losing the 93 prelim was s**t.
Camp was s**t.
2017 GF was s**t.
2012 prelim umpiring was s**t
Kurt Tippett secret deal was s**t
2005/06 wasted opportunities were s**t
Leaving Massie on Buddy was s**t
Ben Rutten giving away the free vs Collingwood in 2009 was s**t.
Goal umpiring decision vs Sydney in 2023 was s**t
Brett Burton as high performance manager was s**t
Nathan van Berlo being cruelled by a sled was s**t.
Trent Hentschel being ruined by injury was s**t.
Tyson Edwards being KOd vs Collingwood in prelim was s**t
Compo for Davis and Bock was s**t
Did he actually use the sit out for a year threat?
I don’t remember that
I thought he said it on radio but now I’m thinking about it, it could have been a radio jock that said it and over the years the memory has become blurred.Did he actually use the sit out for a year threat?
I don’t remember that
Yeah I get your point. Its kind of like the person who complains to netflix because they got offended. So consider my last post. lol
Less than 2 hoursno as he was out of contract.
Less than 2 hours
We should have called Dangerfield’s bluff. He would never sit out a year. We are weak as a club, always have been.
Even if it meant losing any trade it would have sent a message to the rest of the competition.
A good question for the negative nellies is can they find positive ppl who do the same?Yes we know full well this is a discussion board.
But my question is why the need to make the same point over & over?
It's insulting to think we are all too stupid to remember what you posted previously.
Clearly you are refusing to answer & I won't bother asking again.
You've really taken that one and run with it.Yes, posters who do it and claim to know what makes some feel better.
This is true. I was like “Jordan who? Oh, that Sydney guy. Ok, he’s not bad.”Dangerfield was a 3x all Australian and undeniably one of the best mids in the comp. People only became vaguely aware that Jordan Dawson was a footballer a year before we got him. He was a good young utility. There’s no comparison.
Blah blah blah.A good question for the negative nellies is can they find positive ppl who do the same?
Who repeatedly puts up positive threads over and over?
Who, when the board is quiet, puts up a positive point that they know the negatives will bite on to liven things up?
The negatives complain about ppl complaining about their crap, but if they never posted their crap, especially over and over, no one would rebuff it. They're all closet masochists in my view.