AFAIC, the master move is to leave Martin forward of the ball and allow Redman to play his attacking style. They played their natural roles. That allowed us to put on five goals in half a quarter. Why is that a bad thing?Well we played with effort unlike the past few weeks, we actually played a bit of pace so that's something.
I guess it's good we won and people can get all excited about still being alive to make finals. Archie and Bryan get a win at senior level.
But nothing really changed-
- Stringer plays his out of the box game,
- Redman was poor until Martin was told to play more forward but we won so more reward for playing a player out of position and then throwing the late swing master move,
- We again got up for a top level opponent as we normally do when the expectation is we lose,
- Once the pressure of expectation was off they relaxed and were rewarded with a win,
- The overall game pressure wasn't great even our own pressure wasn't that high,
- Individual efforts from leaders were poor,
- Skill level still abysmal,
So we get the nice sugar hit, proud of our boys, finals are still achievable rush as fans.
Whilst also harming us long term as no lessons were learned, in fact conditional effort was rewarded, we hurt our draft position and players that have let us down and should be having their inability to perform play out in plain view for the last month of the season get to hide in the shadows of a 'miraculous' win.
Martin knows more now about how to play a defensive roll. That's great, but surely we should be focused on swinging him back when needed, not the other way around.
Agree on Stringer. He had a great game. I gave him 3 votes. But the pressure is alleviated now. I'm not really expecting to see another game like that from him this year.