Rocca reported

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Zeke
Lade owes the tribunal process. He should testify that there was nothing in it at all - as Jimmy Hird did for him.

1. Lade was going into a ruck contest Rocca wasn't.

2. I don't care and I don't think the tribunal will either that it grazed his shoulder. Going in with your elbow first at right angles to your body is illegal and he should get a week for that alone.
 
Originally posted by Barry Schneider
Rocca will get off.
Collingwood will rightly say that if Brodie Holland's cowardly king hit 50 metres off the ball is only worth 2 weeks then an elbow to the head when the ball is in the vicinity of the contact is perfectly acceptable and the umpire should apologise for the hardship he caused Anthony.
Ditto.
If fat Eddy Could can organise a 2 week sentence for what Holland did then Rocca will get off no probs.
The tribunal lost all its credibility with that one.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Originally posted by ThomasR
Heard the umpire yell 'I'm reporting you'.. and now Ch.10 show a replay of Rocca striking Carr?? with a forearm.

Could be in a bit of trouble but not that much in it - apparently Holland is in strife too.

Will be an interesting week should Collingwood win.
so every station is showing it and they dont seem to give a S**t
 
Originally posted by NMWBloods
In '96 the decision was appealed because Dunkley was cited late and hence the Swans were not given time to mount a proper case.

Yet they had time to mount not one but two supreme court cases. Interesting.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rocca reported

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top