Good onya Memories. Someone else here has seen the light besides me. But how long will it take for the rest of Dockerland to realise that Lyons is not the right fit for Freo?
Where's shane when you need him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Good onya Memories. Someone else here has seen the light besides me. But how long will it take for the rest of Dockerland to realise that Lyons is not the right fit for Freo?
Ross Lyon - i was amazed when he was appointed and Harvey sacked - i didn't really know a lot about it him other than he has been at Sydney and Saints and Finals action for at least 7 years straight (that might come in handy over coaches who have played in 1 or 2 premierships but never coached deep into Sept).
All teams play the boring flooding press style - the ones at the top do it best - I note we are in the middle so obviously not the best at it nor the most boring.
He seems to bring clear structure - A game plan that is solid - easy to determine whether players are following and a successful one based on his winning %. He is far better at passing on his messages to ALL - doesn't take any bullshit from the media. Doesn't play underdone players. doesn't rate players who have played less than 50 games as being "superstars" - eg Barlow, Fyfe, Morrabito and so will get the best out of these types and not let the hype suck him in to playing them if they are not 100% fit - i like these traits and am a bit sick and tired of the boring tag TBH as i don't thnk its warranted. If we kicked half of those points no one would be even say it - blame the players who can't convert, or stick to the game plan, not the coach
However, I will reserve judgement until Freo start well. We are coming from 4 goals down at 1/4 time every game. Maybe Ross iscoaching a defensive game plan because the muppets on the field don't turn up for the first hour.
We can playing attacking football, it's just all happening in the second halves, once we have stemmed the flow.
Every game was an exaggeration, just. We have won 1 first quarter, that being the one against Geelong. But that kind of proves my point. Everyone was happy with the game style against Geelong even some of the Taliban thought it was a good first game by Ross the Devil. Now it's the only game where 1 of Ross' game plans was able to be rolled out early in the game.Didn't you kick the first 5 against Geelong?
Id love to know what was so wrong with your club that mark harvey needed the flick???? You had the worst injuries ive seen a club have in years. How the hell was that harveys fault????
Wrong question to ask!
We spent a lot of the summer arguing about the Harvey sacking and there's no point dredging up past history
I've got no problems with the game plan. I always enjoyed Sydney games - I just saw it as good tough accountable football. If the opposition has the ball, surely you should defend as strongly as you can?
When we are as bad in the middle as we were against Hawthorn (and we were bloody awful) then the ball is going to go deep into our backline and we are going to have to defend. Grimly.
Once we start getting first use of the footy (over to you Messrs Stone and Sumich) then we'll see some faster more attacking footy.
Attack wins you games, but defence wins you championships.
And as Fremantle fans, I don't think we have the luxury to complain about the spectacle or the quality of our wins... Any win is a quality win for us...
You ask Sydney fans and they'll disagree on the skills. They have as many players who have brian fades as Freo, the difference is that they have been playing the game plan for longer.I like watching Sydney as well. I enjoy watching hard, tough accountable footy. Just don't think Freo play it well. Sydney also don't have the appalling skills and poor decision-making that Freo have, which makes it awful (and embarrassing) to watch. Still think if we carry through with this game plan they will need to change some of the playing personnel.
You ask Sydney fans and they'll disagree on the skills. They have as many players who have brian fades as Freo, the difference is that they have been playing the game plan for longer.
I'm sure our players would relish the chance to adhere to any clear structured game plan... And by all reports, RL makes it very clear and simple as to what's required.
You ask Sydney fans and they'll disagree on the skills. They have as many players who have brian fades as Freo, the difference is that they have been playing the game plan for longer.
Im not to sure if the bold above it correct, the Swannies game style suits the smaller grounds.
Our players in the last decade have never been really skillful, but have always had a red hot dig at the footy, being on the small ground it has been easier to close space and restrict opposition from scoring..
We have struggled to win games at ANZ and the MCG over the last decade, when i look at Freo do they really want to play shutdown football, especially on that huge paddock at Subiaco oval, Its possible that the good teams are going to expose Freo on the big grounds, like the Swannies have been exposed before..Therefore taking away Freo's home ground advantage..
Only time will tell though, we did manage to win the won game that counted in 2005..
Goodluck with the game plan.
Stick Sandilands in the forward 50 with Ballas at his feet. If he can't mark it, tap it to Ballas. You're not going to lose much run by keeping 2 guys in the forward 50. But Ross insists on playing a full court press.
Stick Sandilands in the forward 50 with Ballas at his feet. If he can't mark it, tap it to Ballas. You're not going to lose much run by keeping 2 guys in the forward 50. But Ross insists on playing a full court press.
Personally, I feel a lot more comfortable knowing he is going to be our coach for the next five years then I would if it was going to be Harvey.
Can someone in the know tell me what the players thought of Harvey? and what they think of Lyons now?
Harvey was a much better fit for the Dockers. The only thing I didn't like was that injured players were brought back too soon.
It seems to me that Harvey had a good rapport with the players and that Harvey took the blame for an injury plagued season. Anyway the circumstances under which he was axed prove that it was the wrong thing to do. Harvey mightn't have gotten a premiership out of them but they would be more competetive than now and higher up the eight. Look at Harvey's record of Derbies against West Coast!