Round 1 Discussion

[Ingy]

Touk!

raining SC rookie goals

 

[Lums23]

Touk touk still playing apparently

 

[TheOz]

Are you daft? There are countless fumbles that directly lead to turnovers throughout every game that aren't penalised. Why has it suddenly become an issue because it was Ablett who fumbled?

There are? What exact proof do you have that this is the case? Do you also believe that the earth was created in 6 days?

 

[The_Steadier]

Touk Touk!!

 

[MightyMark]

Forgot Miller was even playing, another failed on field rookie choice, should have gone VDB

 

[Raveneyes]

Just traded B.Goodes down to Hamling.

Get $120k plus Saad's score.

Giddy up.

 

[vast]

Salem dominating!

 

[CotchyPls]

Just traded B.Goodes down to Hamling.

Get $120k plus Saad's score.

Giddy up.

This is what i'm thinking.. then upgrade the prince.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Matera will be back unsure if Miller will stay in.

 

[stevebbb]

Salem a joke, what's he on? Like 80? Deserves nothing
If I knew he was going to be gifted points I would have got him

 

[TheOz]

Salem a joke, what's he on? Like 80? Deserves nothing
If I knew he was going to be gifted points I would have got him

80? I wish.

 

[Donakebab]

There are? What exact proof do you have that this is the case? Do you also believe that the earth was created in 6 days?

Do you have proof otherwise? No because you would have provided it. So stop being suck a dickbag about it, watch live scores and see zero change for fumbles leading to turnovers.

 

[TheOz]

Do you have proof otherwise? No because you would have provided it. So stop being suck a dickbag about it, watch live scores and see zero change for fumbles leading to turnovers.

I don't need to provide proof as I haven't made a specific claim requiring a substantiation. It's like people who argue whether god exists or not by asking the question, "prove that god doesn't exist". The burden on proof is on the person making the specific claim or assertion, not on the person questioning it. Understood abdul?

 

[vast]

Damm vandenberg in the bench

 

[Burzum]

Salem a joke, what's he on? Like 80? Deserves nothing
If I knew he was going to be gifted points I would have got him

lol, he finished on a pre-scaled 52.

 

[JC Hawks]

Touk miller should never play afl again, been so far off the pace, joke, will be wasting a trade soon

Settle down mate. First game, he'll come along.

 

[rocker_oz33]

FF giving Newton cherrys umm really was only good in 1 and half quarters,still good sc score.

 

[Donakebab]

Ablett 112 prescale, I'm stoked considering his half time score and his shoulder.
Bennell 90
Saad 87
Miller 28 lol
Vandenberg 93
Hogan 74

I'll take it, some great rookie scores in there.

 

[GOAUS!]

Melbourne

Jeff Garlett 120
Tom McDonald 118
Jeremy Howe 112
Jack Watts 95
Aaron vandenBerg 93
Nathan Jones 93
Daniel Cross 88
Jack Viney 88
Colin Garland 86
Mark Jamar 85
Angus Brayshaw 81
Lynden Dunn 81
Dom Tyson 79
Ben Newton 76
Jesse Hogan 74
Heritier Lumumba 71
Neville Jetta 55
Christian Salem 52
Sam Frost 51
Jay Kennedy-Harris 47
Dean Kent 42
Jimmy Toumpas 11
Jay Kennedy-Harris 4
Dean Kent 3

Gold Coast

Gary Ablett 112
Dion Prestia 100
Steven May 97
Michael Rischitelli 96
Harley Bennell 90
Adam Saad 87
Jarrod Harbrow 81
David Swallow 74
Nick Malceski 74
Zac Smith 72
Daniel Gorringe 67
Jack Martin 61
Rory Thompson 55
Alex Sexton 54
Mitch Hallahan 53
Greg Broughton 51
Trent McKenzie 47
Matt Shaw 45
Kade Kolodjashnij 44
Sam Day 40
Touk Miller 28
Jarrod Garlett 13

 

[SHAKESPEARE]

Taking the Ablett (C)

 

[Super Hans]

Brayshaw - 91
Gaz - 112
Vaders - 93
Saad - 87

Very happy with that.

 

[Ingy]

GAJ will get more of the scaling points than he deserves in a losing side IMO.

Happy days

 

[GOAUS!]

495/7. Sigh. Going Miller over Vandenberg has cost me 65 points.

 

[Donakebab]

I don't need to provide proof as I haven't made a specific claim requiring a substantiation. It's like people who argue whether god exists or not by asking the question, "prove that god doesn't exist". The burden on proof is on the person making the specific claim or assertion, not on the person questioning it. Understood abdul?

Well I have seen with my own eyes for years that fumbles don't result in deduction of points, case in point Gary in the goal square among a shitload of other fumbles today. If you can't deal with that then it's your own problem, so go whinge somewhere else.

 

[GOAUS!]

Taking the Ablett (C)

Really? As your VC?