- Sep 6, 2015
- 28,197
- 23,341
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pelicans, Perf Wildcats
Projected 2100 if my Giants fire today
Realistically 2000-2040
Realistically 2000-2040
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're killing it at the moment with Trel (C) and Sheed, Billings will also get 120 today. I'm projected 2060 so I hope that is not too far away from par. Could have been a lot worse for me if Cousins and Worp didn't turn up...This seems like a high scoring round 1 to kick the season off...there will be a lot of 2200+ scores.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
On the eve of round 3 is what we meanI'm relatively new to RDT. Can someone please explain to me why people keep mentioning trading in round 3? I think that's when the first price changes come in. So wouldn't you want to make some trades like getting Rocky in before he suddenly goes up in price? I know your rookies will also go up in price but I need more cash then that if I'm to bring in Rocky without sacrificing one of my top 5 mids. Seems the only way to get Rocky in is to downgrade Gawn which means you'd want to do it in week 2 rather than wait for him to drop in price and Rocky to increase in price
You're killing it at the moment with Trel (C) and Sheed, Billings will also get 120 today. I'm projected 2060 so I hope that is not too far away from par. Could have been a lot worse for me if Cousins and Worp didn't turn up...
It's been a case of the wrong mid-pricers and my back line has not been good enough with crisp, witherden and smith all 10-20 below what I was expecting.Interesting
Where did you go wrong?
Midpricers and underpriced premiums have gone nuts this week , thought that was the nucleus of your team set up
Fair enough, I guess there'll be a bit of cash generation still for you though.It's been a case of the wrong mid-pricers and my back line has not been good enough with crisp, witherden and smith all 10-20 below what I was expecting.
Nothing has gone drastically wrong however I don't have boak and my structure of only 1 rookie forward meant Drew is stuck on my bench. My unique forwards in Fisher and Mathieson were serviceable but scored less than Drew. My main wins came from the hawks, worpel and cousins.
So yeah, my team is ok but too many small losses and apart from m.crouch no big scores to counter the 'losses'
Good ol hack billings doing his name proud yet again....throw in no Parker and the punishment continues... every bloody year
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yeah, I don't have Parker but apart from that I'm happy with my rookies. Mid-pricers have all outscored their previous averages but another 5-10% improvement would be nice.Fair enough, I guess there'll be a bit of cash generation still for you though.
I'm not too worried about Witherden's and Smith's scores, think they had good kick to handball ratios, just need that extra 15-20% more accumulation
Steele doing absolutely **** all. Oh the joys of dt
If Saints end up winning he will somehow manage to ton up. You just need to hope Saints winBillings will score 70-80 because I swapped boak for him yesterday before the game. Bailey Scott will score 40-50 because I played him over constable.
yep billings still the ultimate burn man. He could still ski down hill in the second half though if saints continue to dominate. 100 is possible stillTry having billings after swapping him for boak yesterday!!! Had billings from the start last season, from the week I traded him he became close to a top 6 forward..dominates in the jlt, real season starts and he becomes an absolute hack again
There's your Rocky trade maybeSteele doing absolutely **** all. Oh the joys of dt
Possibly but he has come good this game. I think i trust Steele a little more than Taranto but I'll reassess after next round. There are always options I guess, sometimes you just need to think outside the box.There's your Rocky trade maybe
Whitfield and a Francis/Ridley type would be better imoWould you guys go
1. Whitfield and Perryman
2. Shaw and Zilliams
$1,700 short of Whitfield and Zilliams
Whitfield and a Francis/Ridley type would be better imo
Whitfield and Francis is the answer thenYeah to fit Ridley in I have to make the choice on the other two pairings