Round 12 AFL

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

I agree it is much better than before, but i cant get it working properly on Tapatalk app, which is pretty annoying as that is how i usually read this forum.
 
I agree it is much better than before, but i cant get it working properly on Tapatalk app, which is pretty annoying as that is how i usually read this forum.
There's a note somewhere in the main forum that Tapatalk won't work at this stage, and no ETA for when it will. I agree, it's a pain.
 
TAB
GWS/RICH Under 190.5 @ 1.72

Has only gone over 190.5 twice this year with GWS, being hammered by NTH and WCE.
Expected to rain on Saturday in Blacktown, not to RICH style of play / low scoring.
GWS ave 56.3pt For (two highest scores 94 vs GC, 69 vs WCE)

Looks like a good bet to me, considering the projected weather. I'm getting on. :thumbsu:
 
Four more line bets for me for the round, but none of them as big as the Blues last night. Thankyou Eagles for innaccurate kicking!!

STK line +15.5 1.2 units
RICH line -57.5 1.6 units
GCST line +37.5 1.5 units
PORT line +16.5 1.5 units
 
It's much better than before. It's just a pain on the phone with those banners up the top.

No, it isn't. It's shizen houzen. I'm an active poster/hilarious big-noter like yourself KP on a couple of US betting forums...I'm not against change by any means, but the design looks ugly, is harder to read and I can't see the benefit of it.
 
No, it isn't. It's shizen houzen. I'm an active poster/hilarious big-noter like yourself KP on a couple of US betting forums...I'm not against change by any means, but the design looks ugly, is harder to read and I can't see the benefit of it.
why are other forums relevant?

it's just a design, and a matter of taste, if you don't like it stick to your other forums.

I don't like it that much either but why whine about it?
 
why are other forums relevant?

it's just a design, and a matter of taste, if you don't like it stick to your other forums.

I don't like it that much either but why whine about it?

The forum members are the people who keep the site going so they need to "whine" when things are not good otherwise it wont improve
 
he signed up to post that he doesn't like the look of the site, hardly a concern.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

can someone please explain to me why port are $2.75? i get sutton, no boak & poor history, but so far this season port have looked the better team. surely it's at least 50/50?
 
Adelaide -12.5 @ 1.94 (Centrebet - 20% PYOL Bonus)
Adelaide -58.5 @ 10.90 (Centrebet - 20% PYOL Bonus)

and for a laugh : Adelaide -99.5 @ 67 (Sportsbet)
 
Liking that.:thumbsu:
well done guys i got very scared there late hehe
happy.gif
happy.gif
happy.gif

happy.gif
happy.gif
happy.gif
 
1 unit Rance over Newman in SC @ 1.88. Average of 92 v 82.

2.5 units Golstein over Wells in SC @ 1.85. Same reasoning as last week only worry is that it's against GC but quite confident Goldstein wins this more times then he would lose.

Adding 1 unit Greene over McDonald in DT. Greene is a ball magnet and averages 4 more points per game and after missing a few weeks it's been a while since McDonald scored well (hasn't scored over 72 since round 6).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top