
Keg on legs
Cancelled




Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Rd 20 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup - Quarter Finals - Last Coach Standing - Final 6 ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025! ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 20 AFF Talk Rd 20 - AF Trades - Captains/VCs
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nope. No interest. The same one that's already been posted five times on this page!!
Nope. No interest. The same one that's already been posted five times on this page!!![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You realise that there’s no way you’ll get 18 warm bodies on the park in Round 13 — unless you try something ... zany.
You are correct regarding contested possession scoring
Which begs the question, if you take a contested possession then get caught holding the ball is it basically score neutral?
Who decides what a tap on is?
That is where the fraud lies
Almost everything is subjective in football except for the scores.
Why stop at questioning what is a tap?
What is a tackle?
What is contested?
CD have multiple watchers deciding these subjective things, like how boxing or olympic diving have multiple judges.
This does a decent job of cancelling out the individual bias factor.
Not sure is posted yet.View attachment 379699
Still doesn't explain how Bont was on 10 points at a time where all he had was two tackles and 2 FA
Obviously he was caught holding the ball in a specific, high scoring "zone".Still doesn't explain how Bont was on 10 points at a time where all he had was two tackles and 2 FA
tl;drWhile disagreeing with the scoring it's good that CD are being transparent.
My take having watched 90% of the game.
Possession scoring feels about right to me. JPK clearly got a lot more of the ball.
Disposal scoring way out of proportion with game influence. Regardless of the scoring system, JPK should be getting more points for his 15 effective handballs given how many of them started Swans possession chains from clearances and contested situations. If Bont only had 1 kick clanger I was clearly watching a different game. He absolutely butchered it by foot. In contrast I can't recall JPK butchering so many kicks. The overall disposal difference should be way more in Kennedy's favour. 6 points difference is just wrong. Should be more like 26.
Knock ons looks ok. Bont did do a few that seemed to advantage his team.
Scoreboard. Bont should lose points for missing from point blank range. The scoring system is stuffed in this situation. His score assist was pretty basic - kick out the back which wasn't that well directed (but it was there). Kennedy goal a bit underscored I think. Kennedy should be a few more points up for this stat.
Frees. Bont might actually be hard done by here. At least two of his frees were a bit marginal. I hate the way this is scored too. Do you lose points for a professional fk that stops a likely turnover goal to the oppo for example.
Defensive is wrong. I'm sure because Bont is tall and stands out he's getting tackle credits he doesn't deserve. And the weighting for tackles (as someone else mentioned) is all wrong - the points awarded to Bont here don't reflect his very minor influence on the game. It also s%$#s me that in a contested situation, JPK will often get to a ball that looks like it's heading the Bullies way and manage to tie it up for another stoppage. Bont arrives a fraction later to tackle him. Result is 3 points Bont, 0 JPK when JPK has actually done more to benefit his team. So the problem here is the scoring system.
Summary - Bonts game is favoured strongly by the scoring system. JPK dominated but his strengths go somewhat unrewarded. Plus some possible small amount of pro Bont bias in the subjective components (i.e what's a clanger) but it's probably pretty small.
Makes me a bit more educated about how the system works but still not happy with the result.
Do you reckon Champion_Data prefers Bont's right or left nut? Which "zone" of his scrotum is the higher scoring one?tl;dr
KOTD
Right here
![]()