Find the analysis one-sided / pessimistic.
Doesn't factor in Gawn being the primary beneficiary of no third man up, stronger midfield he's rucking to, Melb better winning percentage etc.
Witts doesn't have the capacity to go 150+, Gawn can.
But if you reckon the relative gain is better elsewhere, fair enough, back yourself in. Good luck.
Good argument the other way.
I like what both sides have to say.....
I dont know who to follow....
Can someone please, just tell me what to do!