And not a single tear was shed.They looked like the dog that has had the shit kicked out of it.
Didn't bark, just walked away with their tails between their collective legs.
They looked broken.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And not a single tear was shed.They looked like the dog that has had the shit kicked out of it.
Didn't bark, just walked away with their tails between their collective legs.
They looked broken.
I'll put in $100If that's the case, I hope someone starts a public fundraiser.
I think the AFL and certain fanboy footy media would be very surprised by the amount raised.
I thought the complete and utter lack of a response from the Essendon players was interesting. Where is all the team spirit in the face of adversity now? They just look like they don't care anymore. About anything.
Good sportsmanship - when you don't try to get a pharmacological advantage over your opponents? Right?Do I really have to explain the concept of good sportsmanship to you do I buddy?
Yes - agree 100%. That is what annoyed me - no reaction from any players at all. I don't really care either way about what Mitchell did but there is a way to respond - and we didn't do it (and certainly didn't do it on the scoreboard)
But I have to agree that the players don't care anymore. The sooner Hird goes, the better.
Collingwood play hawthorn next eh?Mitchell should be rubbed out for 1 week.
yeah what disgusting behaviour eh.Good sportsmanship - when you don't try to get a pharmacological advantage over your opponents? Right?
Or hating a team more than anyone else. Sportsmanship. LolGood sportsmanship - when you don't try to get a pharmacological advantage over your opponents? Right?
Banned then or now?yeah what disgusting behaviour eh.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...-on-wada-website/story-e6frf3e3-1226574349797
Adelaide Crows won 1998 premiership on supplement that carries a warning on WADA website
Adelaide Crows pushed the boundaries in its 1998 premiership season by using colostrum, one of the supplements that carries a warning on the World Anti-Doping Authority's website and has been linked to Essendon.
The WADA website, addressing the list of banned substances for 2013, says: "Colostrum is not prohibited per se, however it contains certain quantities of IGF-1 and other growth factors which are prohibited and can influence the outcome of anti-doping tests.
"Therefore WADA does not recommend the ingestion of this product."
The danger with colostrum is that it contains a growth hormone that is illegal.
Geez you've got me. They took a substance that isn't banned. Their hormone levels were tested and legal. Geez we're on the deck now. Finish us off.yeah what disgusting behaviour eh.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...-on-wada-website/story-e6frf3e3-1226574349797
Adelaide Crows won 1998 premiership on supplement that carries a warning on WADA website
Adelaide Crows pushed the boundaries in its 1998 premiership season by using colostrum, one of the supplements that carries a warning on the World Anti-Doping Authority's website and has been linked to Essendon.
The WADA website, addressing the list of banned substances for 2013, says: "Colostrum is not prohibited per se, however it contains certain quantities of IGF-1 and other growth factors which are prohibited and can influence the outcome of anti-doping tests.
"Therefore WADA does not recommend the ingestion of this product."
The danger with colostrum is that it contains a growth hormone that is illegal.
Banned then or now?
did you guys even read the post and what it was in response to?Geez you've got me. They took a substance that isn't banned. Their hormone levels were tested and legal. Geez we're on the deck now. Finish us off.
Meanwhile: salary cap rorting and draft tampering to a 1993 premiership. Charged, proven, sanctioned.
Especially if they wear sombreros whilst doing soWill be interesting to see the reaction if supporters start doing this en masse at Bombres games.
omg, you think having a passionate hatred of a team is unsporting?Or hating a team more than anyone else. Sportsmanship. Lol
Yeah I did. But if a pharmacological advantage is cheating I reckon that's not very sportsman-like. The distinction is one I am making.did you guys even read the post and what it was in response to?
Why don't you try again and see how you go, hopefully I don't need to point it out to you
this should be good. Please show where any of the players have "played the we had no choice card"David Zaharakis refused to be injected with anything from the EFC, 34 other players play the "we had no choice" card.
Essendon players sledge opposition players about factual and non factual events...
Yet Hird claims Mitchell's sledge about a factual event is "naive and idiotic"...
Talk about irony!
Hird creating the longest train wreck in sporting history. Funny shit!
No I don't at all. Just like I don't see Mitchell's sledge being a big deal. That's my point. Youse are being a tad preciousomg, you think having a passionate hatred of a team is unsporting?
******* lololololol
Better call off sport then. Especially any cross town rivalries in local footy. Most namby post I've just about ever read
a pharmacological advantage is a pharmacological advantage. Jen seemed not to understand her team has done it, and every time has done it. And it absolute ridiculousness of you making such a post when the actual situation is that the only time the players have faced trial they've been cleared.Yeah I did. But if a pharmacological advantage is cheating I reckon that's not very sportsman-like. The distinction is one I am making.
Why should they? They get to hide behind their union:this should be good. Please show where any of the players have "played the we had no choice card"
No I don't at all. Just like I don't see Mitchell's sledge being a big deal. That's my point. Youse are being a tad precious
Or hating a team more than anyone else. Sportsmanship. Lol
ah right, so what you actually said is complete rubbish. Glad we cleared that upWhy should they? They get to hide behind their union:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...erimental-workplace-aflpa-20130710-2pq40.html
It's a sledge Lance. Your team should grow a pair for crying out loud. Mitchell is stirring and he is not a tribubal member, journalist or judicial officer - he's an AFL player stirring the pot. Who's being mamby pamby now?a pharmacological advantage is a pharmacological advantage. Jen seemed not to understand her team has done it, and every time has done it. And it absolute ridiculousness of you making such a post when the actual situation is that the only time the players have faced trial they've been cleared.