Scott Pendlebury vs Trent Cotchin

Pendlebury or Cotchin

  • Pendlebury

    Votes: 116 66.7%
  • Cotchin

    Votes: 58 33.3%

  • Total voters
    174

Remove this Banner Ad

What seems to be lost in this argument was Cotchin's 2011 was outstanding and his first with a preseason.

Having said that it is a toss of the coin at the moment. Gone Cotch on club lines
 

Log in to remove this ad.

This discussion is about the levels of excellence each player has reached. You just stated that they're both now at the same level - you've just actually confirmed this.
Who said this thread was about anything other than two players? Read the OP, it doesn't ask anything about "the levels of excellence each player has reached", it's simply Pendlebury vs Cotchin. People can make this thread about what you want, and it looks like you're trying to make it into something that has Cotchin ahead and you're upset whenever someone says otherwise...
 
Who said this thread was about anything other than two players? Read the OP, it doesn't ask anything about "the levels of excellence each player has reached", it's simply Pendlebury vs Cotchin. People can make this thread about what you want, and it looks like you're trying to make it into something that has Cotchin ahead and you're upset whenever someone says otherwise...

One should never assume Ed. Oh, and when you get a moment can you cut n paste the bits where I stated Cotchin was ahead of Pendlebury because I couldn't find them.
 
The quotes Ed, the quotes??? This will secure your verbal victory, but you must produce the quotes, you're credibility is in jeopardy without these quotes Ed...
Can you show me where the OP said this poll was about the level of excellence both players have reached?
 
Can you show me where the OP said this poll was about the level of excellence both players have reached?


How can you reason that this could be about ANYTHING else?

"Scott Pendlebury vs Trent Cotchin". Got bored - discuss.:p What else could it possibly be?

I have reasoned that its not about the best haircut, now it's your turn, see what you can come up with....
 
How can you reason that this could be about ANYTHING else?

"Scott Pendlebury vs Trent Cotchin". Got bored - discuss.:p What else could it possibly be?

I have reasoned that its not about the best haircut, now it's your turn, see what you can come up with....
So....... it wasn't said?

Next time you're gonna get on your high horse ensure you are not doing the thing you are having a go at others for doing.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So....... it wasn't said?

Next time you're gonna get on your high horse ensure you are not doing the thing you are having a go at others for doing.

I think you've completely missed the point, but it's Sunday morning so I guess that could be a reason.
I entered this thread to address those here who just refuse to accept that Cotchin was anywhere near Pendlebury - "not even close right now", "there's a fair bit" etc - now, anyone who has even half a clue knows that's simply ridiculous. I've been asking for justification why they mysteriously don't rate Cotchin as highly as 99.9% of the football world, but just get lame, stubborn deflections. Nobody has given me anything, other than one guy showing enormous humility by amending his assessment from "a fair bit" to "a bit". I can only wonder what's happening in their brains - I'm guessing they think that I'm saying Cotchin is better than Pendlebury - I am not.

Oh, and I currently do not, nor have I ever owned a horse.
 
I think you've completely missed the point, but it's Sunday morning so I guess that could be a reason.
I entered this thread to address those here who just refuse to accept that Cotchin was anywhere near Pendlebury - "not even close right now", "there's a fair bit" etc - now, anyone who has even half a clue knows that's simply ridiculous. I've been asking for justification why they mysteriously don't rate Cotchin as highly as 99.9% of the football world, but just get lame, stubborn deflections. Nobody has given me anything, other than one guy showing enormous humility by amending his assessment from "a fair bit" to "a bit". I can only wonder what's happening in their brains - I'm guessing they think that I'm saying Cotchin is better than Pendlebury - I am not.

Oh, and I currently do not, nor have I ever owned a horse.
I haven't missed the point. You carried on like a petulant child and don't like being called out on it.
 
Pendlebury, by a country mile.
 
In what way? Like a Reiwoldt > Petrie or closer.

No, I'd take Petrie. :)
Pendlebury is at a higher level than Cotchin and has been there for longer. :)
 
Lol

Either reiwoldt is so far ahead of petrie it's not even funny.

Lol'd.

NM vs StKilda, 2012:

Petrie: 4 Goals.

N. Riewoldt: 1 Goal.

NM vs Richmond, 2012:

Petrie: 7 goals.

J. Riewoldt: 3 goals.

Alright, champ.
 
Pendlebury quite easily atm. When he's injury free is one of the mosy influential players running around.
Cotchin may catch him, though Pendlebury may very well have another gear as well..
 
Lol'd.

NM vs StKilda, 2012:

Petrie: 4 Goals.

N. Riewoldt: 1 Goal.

NM vs Richmond, 2012:

Petrie: 7 goals.

J. Riewoldt: 3 goals.

Alright, champ.

Most he has ever kicked.

58 in one year is his best ever, Jack has already 60+ in three of his six years, and Nick 60+ four times.

Your funny, lol. Petrie over both Riewoldts, lol.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scott Pendlebury vs Trent Cotchin

Back
Top