Masten was awful last year (and a couple of games earlier this year) and Gaff was only considered trade bait because we felt we were in full-rebuild mode and figured he was one of the few players we had with any significant currency.Last season people were calling for Gaff and Masten to be traded, and look at them now....
I assume the '....' means you think that because Gaff and Masten improved/rediscovered form, that Selwood will also?