Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,380
- 87,913
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont think we'll need to pay 1 mill to keep him tbh. Think it will be like 800k max. If true, the 1 mill is the 20% overs clubs pay to try to pull out a player from a club.Freo will match no doubt about it
He's contracted till the end of 2024. He'll have extended his contract at Freo before they even get a chance to offer it.Freo will match no doubt about it
Our focus has always been TDK not Darcy.I was informed the other day Geelong are out of the running for Darcy, which is why they are now keen on TDK.
They found a Cotton On franchise under the car seat.I was informed the other day Geelong are out of the running for Darcy, which is why they are now keen on TDK.
Our focus has always been TDK not Darcy.
That's strange, cause Darcy is clearly the better player.
Honestly, I give Quartermain a little more credit because he doesnt have a history of blatantly making stuff up like Sumich (yet) but yes, this is all a non-event and everyone knows he's staying and staying on less than a mill a year. Easy way to meet a clicks quota for Quartermain though.They run this story every year (usually Sumich), and every year its BS.
Darcy will pen a long term extension - no doubt about that -, but it doesn't quite have the same clickbait ring to it, if those dastardly east coast clubs aren't getting rejected in the process, does it?
Can't wait for him and Parish to re-sign, so we can stop having half ass 'journos' who have a quota and just publish BS constantly to hit them - all because they go 'oh Geelong like Falcons, yep they're interested...I just know it.'
Ugh.
Geelong just got caught in the crossfire this time, it's really just the West trying to undermine Freo as usual.Geelong being linked with a player from the region is just normal journalistic click bait. I'm sure we've asked the question but there are probably 20 players we've asked the question about and almost all won't come.
I dont think we'll need to pay 1 mill to keep him tbh. Think it will be like 800k max. If true, the 1 mill is the 20% overs clubs pay to try to pull out a player from a club.
Depends what you view Jackson as I suppose. 800k on a ruck and 800k on a 198cm labrador puppy is good list managementThat would be a lot of salary cap tied up in the ruck department.
Likely we were never in the running for Darcy. We've chucked in an offer anyway it seems.That's strange, cause Darcy is clearly the better player.
Depends what you view Jackson as I suppose. 800k on a ruck and 800k on a 198cm labrador puppy is good list management
Geelong get named in this sort of stuff all the time. Any journalist or manager looking to drum up a story puts Geelong's name out there given our trade and free agency history.Geelong just got caught in the crossfire this time, it's really just the West trying to undermine Freo as usual.
No current season stats available
We've got the same salary cap as everyone else. And as a proportion of the cap that contract would be less than Cameron or Dangerfield received. Seems not too crazy for one of the best young rucks in the game.I thought Cats don't offer that sort of money for players?
Or is that only the excuse when they get knocked back by their target who chooses to go elsewhere...