Frankenswan
Debutant
- Oct 1, 2013
- 122
- 44
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #1,026
That's a July 23 article.
Yeah 2 months and change
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's a July 23 article.
Back on topic. If Adams ends up staying at GWS because of the Buddy move to Sydney then Shaw MUST not be traded unless a deal can be reached that benefits the club. I do not want to see him let go for an average trade because we have placed his behaviour in the too hard basket.
Kristian Jaksch shh
Weak draft for key positions, Jaksch is 195cm, homesick and highly touted.. would be miles ahead of the best we could get in the draft (McCarthy 195cm new to the game and will take 4 years at least) and we can still get a Harvey 195cm (Nephew of Matt Rendell) or Conlon 197cm (Top 5 before injury) in the 2nd round as wellI don't pretend to be up on the players available in the draft. I'll leave that to NM. If we can get a pick inside the top 10 that enables us to recruit a player with the potential to achieve what Shaw has then I will be satisfied.
Lol, Hine said just yesterday we weren't going for Boyd and people are still trying to conjure up a trade for him.
So Shaw is deep throat?
Cunning isn't he. We are so going after him.Lol, Hine said just yesterday we weren't going for Boyd and people are still trying to conjure up a trade for him.
You arent apart of Collingwood or Gws, you dont have a clue if we have a chance or notI don't want to trade Shaw for Adams would rather there pick 9 we are no chance of getting pick 1
You arent apart of Collingwood or Gws, you dont have a clue if we have a chance or not
if Hine wants pick 1, Hine will get pick 1.Would love to be wrong but Shaw and pick 10 will not get us pick 1 we struggle to land these big trades
Everyone struggles to land these big trades. For the most part, big fish just don't move clubs. Pick #1 isn't much different.Would love to be wrong but Shaw and pick 10 will not get us pick 1 we struggle to land these big trades
Harry - Sidebottom - Shaw
All expendable, especially when it comes to possibly using them as bait to land high picks off certain clubs, whether or not that's as a package or individually is a different story.
if Hine wants pick 1, Hine will get pick 1.
Harry - Sidebottom - Shaw
All expendable, especially when it comes to possibly using them as bait to land high picks off certain clubs, whether or not that's as a package or individually is a different story.
How do Harry and Sidebottom get thrown into this equation. High draft picks, whilst promising, are also unknown at AFL level. Ever heard of Jack Watts?
Am I the only one that doesn't want Sidebottom, Shaw and DT to go.....I'd even like to keep Harry-O as much as he pisses me off as a person.
I don't understand why we would want to offload Steel. In his junior years he was rated elite for his disposal, something that he struggled with this year but so did the rest of the team.
Looking at our team stats over the last 4 years, our Disposal Efficiency hasnt changed much but our 1% have gone from being #1 ranked in 2010 to slowly fall away over the next 4 years to #8. Contested Possessions have gone from ranked #1 in 2010 to #11 this year and Clearances ranked #6 in 2010 to fall away to #15 this year.
Seems that the loss of Ball and Beams really hurts us like we know but maybe our game plan needs work.
Am I the only one that doesn't want Sidebottom, Shaw and DT to go.....I'd even like to keep Harry-O as much as he pisses me off as a person.