Sickening example of injustice and sexism

Remove this Banner Ad

Adz

Brownlow Medallist
Aug 17, 2003
16,072
8,128
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
WO schoolgirls who participated in the prolonged beating of a disabled boy forced to eat faeces laughed and posed for cameras as they left court after escaping a custodial sentence.

The two girls, who cannot be identified, were just 12 years old when they helped attack the 15-year-old boy who has muscular dystrophy on October 3 last year.

Two males – one who was aged 17 at the time and another who was just 15 – also appeared in court today over the same incident.

Few details of the attack were read out in the Brisbane District Court, but it was revealed the four assaulted the teenager at a derelict house at Mitchelton in Brisbane's north.

During the original hearing in the Brisbane Children's Court on October 7 last year, the court was told the girls threw rocks at the boy as he tried to escape.

The court was told the 17-year-old youth forced the frightened boy to eat faeces while the girls threatened him with a metal pole.

The children's court was then told the two male youths viciously punched and kicked the teenager.

The two girls both pleaded guilty today to two counts of common assault.

The boys both pleaded guilty to two counts of assault occasioning bodily harm, as well as common assault charges.

All four walked free today, after Judge Milton Griffin SC ruled that non-custodial sentences were appropriate given their age and lack of prior criminal convictions.

Judge Griffin said, however, that their actions were "cowardice in the extreme".

The two girls laughed and waved to news cameras as they left the court premises.

They were each released on a 12-month probation order.

The two boys each received a two-year probation order, and were ordered to perform 120 hours of community service
 
the youths who sexually assulted and humilated on film an intelliectually disabled girl didn't get a jail sentence either.

There was a girl and a couple of guys who r*ped another thir friend with a dildo while he was passsed out drunk and filmed and they idn't get jail sentences either. It seems you can get away with way too much these days.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

dont have a link, but i remember reading some time ago some dude who was on drugs and broke into a house and r*ped the female resident. i'm preety sure this guy was given a suspended sentence from memory, if not suspended certainly a sentence that was a joke as i remember my disgust at reading this. our legal system's sentencing is a joke and far to lenient
 
They were each released on a 12-month probation order.

The two boys each received a two-year probation order, and were ordered to perform 120 hours of community service

Your point being...?
 
The boys got the harsher sentence.

The boys were older. Significantly older. The law places more responsibility upon them for that reason.

So how is it sexist?
 
Nothing new here. To my certain knowledge imbeciles have been acting like this for 50 years. The only difference is the media coverage calculated to instill fear and disgust. 'The Truth' is now mainstream.
 
The children's court was then told the two male youths viciously punched and kicked the teenager.

The two girls both pleaded guilty today to two counts of common assault.

The boys both pleaded guilty to two counts of assault occasioning bodily harm, as well as common assault charges.

It's obviously becuase of their age.

How do you figure sexism?

You're probably right, but it could just be ignorance of the law or lack of comprehension skills.

Or all three.
 
ridiculous thread

how on earth are the psychologists and psychiatrists of this country going to make money if any form of abuse and bullying by school age children is not openly encouraged by soft sentences from our courts.

the fact this went to trial alone is an embarassment. bullies need to be allowed to operate openly in order to fund the mental-minefield this country plans on building by looking the other way from the problem.
 
I was listening to ABC radio on the way home last evening in Brisbane.
They were talking about this case, when a lady rang in.

The problem appears to be that these 2 girls have no remorse. They have longterm problems. they live in Keperra, in housing commission, from families with problems. These children roam the streets day and night, they abuse neighbours. This particular lady was a social worker, who had tried to set up a neighbourhood house type program to help the kids They had to be moved, due to abuse from these girls.

nasty pasties.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ridiculous thread

how on earth are the psychologists and psychiatrists of this country going to make money if any form of abuse and bullying by school age children is not openly encouraged by soft sentences from our courts.

the fact this went to trial alone is an embarassment. bullies need to be allowed to operate openly in order to fund the mental-minefield this country plans on building by looking the other way from the problem.[/QUO

I think you are joking or are the embarassment here actually.
 
Anyone that sick and disturbed and who shows absolutely no moral fibre deserves to be punished severley.

Pity prison would only make them more f***** up.
 
campbell you are such an elitist and an ideologue

if anything these so-called criminals should be rewarded for their darwanian treatment of the mentally handicapped.
 
how is a difference of opinion trolling? hell, how is agreeing with the legal system of australia trolling?

this is a thread filled with people scandalising australia's judicial system. i however agree that they should have been allowed to walk free. it's a free country and good on them for celebrating their victory in the court by posing for the cameras etc.
 
how is a difference of opinion trolling? hell, how is agreeing with the legal system of australia trolling?

this is a thread filled with people scandalising australia's judicial system. i however agree that they should have been allowed to walk free. it's a free country and good on them for celebrating their victory in the court by posing for the cameras etc.

If you aren't trolling and actually believe what you're saying, my god I don't have the words to say.
 
You're a sad individual, justifying abuse of a disabled person. As a supposed Christian, you should be disgusted at this act of cruelty. I know your "savior" would be.
i think you'll find that The Chad's saviour makes the world the way it is and obvoiusly had no issue with this happening.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Sickening example of injustice and sexism

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top