slatts4215
Debutant
does it matter where you play the result is almost always the same.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Solomon - straight to the tribunal
- Thread starter chapmanmagic35
- Start date
- Tagged users None
does it matter where you play the result is almost always the same.
- Banned
- #102
Josh Hunt
No ____ way.
That's either blatant cheating of something weird is going on here.
What's the difference between Kerr and Hunt? Not much.
Shall we go back and start making comparisons on every decision that has ever been made by the match review panel? We know its inconsistant.
Bottom line - Kerr is a dirty rat, Hunt is generally a fair player. Anyone playing for the cats who didn't throw some fire around after seeing Ling go down was doing VERY WELL.
Why am I not surprised that you'd post some random, irrelevant crap?
Geelong can dish out what? Fractured cheekbones? Or are you suggesting that in the past Cats' supporters have laughed about a players injury but now have an issue about Freo supporters finding Ling's injury funny?
Big Cox took pleasure in Muston's knee injury, BigFooty posters correctly labelled him a shit stain for that thread. You guys aren't far off.
Off The Couch
TheBrownDog
- Oct 4, 2007
- 51,003
- 68,482
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
No player deserves to be taken out of the game in such a manner, you my fellow hawk are a tosser of the highest order
but can we still be friends?
They got it right in comparison to similar incidents, ie Mcglynn got 4 weeks and Burgoyne 3 weeks for similar scenarios, lucky it was Hodgey he collected and not one of our lightweights, man is as tough as nails, no damage done.
Also, for those who didnt see the game Goodesy was at it again but this time he missed, bloke has issues, needs to see BBB's psychologist.
- Apr 3, 2006
- 34,627
- 13,372
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Motlop's on Taylor a few weeks ago was much worse again and not cited.
Yup.
slatts4215
Debutant
another one who jumped on in 07?
i bet that jumper looks nice and clean!
Mate I grew up in th 70's, a few decades before your team was a gleam in the AFL's eye. I have seen real hard teams & real snipers. Not these piss-ant "thugs" of today but Soloman would be right at home in the 70's. Back then he would paid a high price for being a gutless sniper believe me payback was a b*tch.
Wisdom tell me that Freo supporters and players don,t like REd heads!
Quoting another man of great wisdom Kamahl "why are you so Unkind!"
Quoting another man of great wisdom Kamahl "why are you so Unkind!"
Good for you mate!
Don’t take it personally – I’m at work, I’m bored and I’m trolling!
Both were forearms to the head. Kerr's more severe and thus deserves a bigger penalty.
For Hunt to not even be cited is a farce.
Did they send Milburn "Straight to the Tribunal" when he almost paralysed SOS?
Hardly a time for Geelong supporters to start taking the moral high ground on such matters
Hardly a time for Geelong supporters to start taking the moral high ground on such matters
Yes, so typical of the umpiring in that game, lay a finger on someone in a marking contest, free kick. Knock someones head off and get rubbed out for 4 weeks, don't be silly, no free kick for that.
Hunt's was the upper arm, actually.
- Banned
- #116
Well he's sure no Nicole Kidman.
Rumour has it he's quite pleased with the result of Solly's work on the weekend.
Was before the points system so all cases were 'straight to the tribunal'
- Jun 22, 2008
- 24,580
- 21,287
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Well if we're going all the way back to 2001 we may as well go back to 1985, what'r you reckon.
Build a bridge. It was 7 years ago, no Geelong fans are claiming Milburn did the right thing, and it was a single dog act in an otherwise unblemished 230+ game career- not like Solomon who's made a career of it. Quit bringing it up as though it proves a point. All it proves is that the person bringing it up doesn't know how to think properly.
Just checked the rule book. Deliberate upper arm to the head is ok.
Nothing to see here then.
Exhale You
Premiership Player
Um, all they had back then was the tribunal, Sherlock.
So when will the time be? Another 8 years?
They should just ban the whole Freo club, they're clearly not here to play football.
No1SwansFan
All Australian
Just looked and it is 5 reduced to 4. Still far too much.
The_Kid_23
Rookie
Get over it Freo supporters, what do you expect when you come out to play and dish out that rubbish? Expect Geelong to stand by and let it happen? Stupid football from thugs, surprised Carr didnt have a brain implosion too that's all he's good for these days.
Having said that, Crowley did deserve a week.. Using Motlop's as a precedent for Hunt then there isn't a case to answer there, however it just highlights the inconsistencies of the MRP, ie: Ronnie Burns getting a week for a fresh airy on a Carlton player, or when Ling got one for a jumper punch on Buckley (both ages ago but there's always going to be these inconsistencies which makes it even more annoying) IMO both should have been sighted, and Mooney probably should have too..
You can hardly call Geelong protected, how often does it happen? The fact that the Free Kick count was so lopsided early would surely indicate the opposite considering all Freo was doing was go the man in the first half..
Having said that, Crowley did deserve a week.. Using Motlop's as a precedent for Hunt then there isn't a case to answer there, however it just highlights the inconsistencies of the MRP, ie: Ronnie Burns getting a week for a fresh airy on a Carlton player, or when Ling got one for a jumper punch on Buckley (both ages ago but there's always going to be these inconsistencies which makes it even more annoying) IMO both should have been sighted, and Mooney probably should have too..
You can hardly call Geelong protected, how often does it happen? The fact that the Free Kick count was so lopsided early would surely indicate the opposite considering all Freo was doing was go the man in the first half..
