I wont buy into team bias, but i’ll buy into an AFL conspiracy to hurt North.Still it would be an interesting academic exercise to do some stats around umpiring at the AFL, for example would the stats support the supposition that junk time frees favours the side with less free kicks. Is there an unconscious bias based on who the umpire supported as a kid or played for? Is there really any improvement to the game based on increasing the number of umpires?
They want to be seen making a “great call” whether it's wrong or not. As we know, we get the sediment of the umpire brew, obviously trying to make a name for themselves or stand out by making borderline 50/50 calls.
Its the 50/50 call that shits me to tears. If its 50/50 let it play on.