Stephen Dank has 11 days to hand over papers about supplement program to former Sharks players

[I Rock]

Which would create a number of problems such as adequate documentation

An old version of Microsoft office would create a problem such as inadequate documentation.

 

[Spongebob]

But if its not 12 its irrelevant

Well why did you keep insisting it was 12 clubs with inadequate documentation?

 

[I Rock]

Which are you using to bury your head in the sand?

I'm only trying to find where yours is on the Island of Hird.

 

[JRoo]

The supplements survey also found that 12 clubs conducted programs with medium or high levels of supplement use and lacked "a single point of accountability".

So 12 clubs lacked a single point of accountability. Its not a hard stretch to say this was a reason for their lack of adequate documentation.

This survey has found you out for the fraud you are. You don't care one bit that other clubs were also found to have medium to high levels of supplements with poorly documented programs. Youre now simply hiding behind the number 12.

Oh jesus it it any wonder Hird is able to get away with what he has done when the #StandbyHird suicide cultist comes out with this rubbish.

And once again you stated that 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used; i and numerous posters have asked to to provide evidence of this but you can't.

 

[I Rock]

But if its not 12 its irrelevant

Apparently not to you; you're the one that has pulled that number out of nowhere.

 

[mxett]

Well why did you keep insisting it was 12 clubs with inadequate documentation?

So if its not 12 its not relevant.

 

[I Rock]

So if its not 12 its not relevant.

Where did you get the number 12 from?

 

[mxett]

Oh jesus it it any wonder Hird is able to get away with what he has done when the #StandbyHird suicide cultist comes out with this rubbish.

And once again you stated that 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used; i and numerous posters have asked to to provide evidence of this but you can't.

And you continue to ignore poor inadequate documentation in a high supplement program. Where's worksafe??

 

[JRoo]

And you continue to ignore poor inadequate documentation in a high supplement program. Where's worksafe??

Show me were 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used will you? Or is this just a deflection from the standard #standbyhird suicide squad members?

 

[Armchair Critic]

And you continue to ignore poor inadequate documentation in a high supplement program. Where's worksafe??

You do know that the quote about Poor documentation could relate to one club , one club who is currently being investigated and accepted a punishment for bringing the game into disrepute.

There is no number to base your assumptions on

 

[I Rock]

And you continue to ignore poor inadequate documentation in a high supplement program. Where's worksafe??

Define inadequate documentation. I had to have a chat to a worker today because they sent inadequate documentation to a supplier overseas. She didn't outline her fonts.

 

[JRoo]

But that article never says 12 clubs. It just says inappropriate documentation. That could mean anything.

Yep the article does not state that 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used at all, but try telling that to one of the resident #Standbyhird suicide squad members!

 

[mxett]

Where did you get the number 12 from?

I have no idea
The supplements survey also found that 12 clubs conducted programs with medium or high levels of supplement use and lacked "a single point of accountability".
12 AFL clubs 'flirted' with supplements danger http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

Where did you get the number 12 from?

no idea

http://www.live-news.com.au/news/af...nts-without-adequate-supervision-1179698.html
AFL survey reveals 12 clubs used supplements without adequate supervision

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html
12 AFL clubs 'flirted' with supplements danger

 

[mxett]

Show me were 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used will you? Or is this just a deflection from the standard #standbyhird suicide squad members?

So if its 13 its fine?

 

[I Rock]

I have no idea
The supplements survey also found that 12 clubs conducted programs with medium or high levels of supplement use and lacked "a single point of accountability".
12 AFL clubs 'flirted' with supplements danger http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

no idea

http://www.live-news.com.au/news/af...nts-without-adequate-supervision-1179698.html
AFL survey reveals 12 clubs used supplements without adequate supervision

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html
12 AFL clubs 'flirted' with supplements danger

That's great so you admit that you made a mistake and the 12 clubs mentioned does not relate to documentation in any article you linked.

 

[JRoo]

So if its 13 its fine?

For about the 6th time show me were 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used will you?

 

[mxett]

For about the 6th time show me were 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used will you?

"According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented"
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

Will this do worksafe?

 

[DonsRule]

Has he handed them over yet?

 

[mxett]

"According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented"
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

Hmmm, using substances not clearly understood. Were these authorised by the club doctor?

 

[JRoo]

"According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented"
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

Will this do worksafe?

No it won't as it doesn't support your statement that 12 clubs failed to document all of the substances they used.

I am also waiting for you to tell me what section of the OHS Act you believe these 12 clubs broke to breach their due diligence requirements under the Act?

 

[Armchair Critic]

Has he handed them over yet?

Listed Court date 25th Feb

Cordoba V Dank

Gordon V Dank 1100hrs

 

[I Rock]

"According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented"
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html

Will this do worksafe?

But you showed the report and it looks like 3AW misquoted.

 

[Armchair Critic]

Just did. read it and weep

You do realise that is an statement made by the blog writer don't you

 

[I Rock]

Just did. read it and weep

See above post.

 

[JRoo]

What are you talking about mxett. I am happy to discuss whatever you want about what the speculation on the other 12 clubs means. You however made a definitive statement that you were asked to back up and cannot. Yet instead of admitting it; you rabbit on like a fool.

Show that 12 other clubs had inadequate or as JRoo claims you stated no documentation; or admit you got it wrong. We can then speculate what the 12 other clubs were up to as much as you like.

Thats what he claimed and when i asked him to back this up he deflected.

Is it any wonder the EFC was able to get away with what it has done when it's members are blindly stupid about the risks and harm their players may have been put through under the EFC supplements program.