- Thread starter
- #251
Why are looking to get rid of Minson if your looking for a quality ruckman.
i think u just answered ur own question.
and, malceski for stanton+68
confirmed by eagles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why are looking to get rid of Minson if your looking for a quality ruckman.
i think u just answered ur own question.
and, malceski for stanton+68
confirmed by eagles.
J.Moore from Collingowood for pick 19 from Melbourne
Minson is alright, Isn't he?
wow wow wow
there are people out there who actually think Richards is better than Garland
I am one of them
I am one of them
whos your hookup?
i need a new ounce and it seems like you smoke good stuff.
green+17 for stenglein+24
confirmed by eagles.
whos your hookup?
i need a new ounce and it seems like you smoke good stuff.
Hes not bad but I want a quality ruckman, but its quality laughs when you see him go for a 3 bounce run through the middle and I think ive found a good ruckmanwell, hes ok. he tries hard, hes just not very good.
he told me not to tell neone coz my dealer only sells to high paying customers who know their stuff....
Highlight the next line to reveal my Supplier
DYLZA94
All that shows that Richards @ 25 year of age (nearing his peak age) can only manage an average of 15 possesions while playing on the 2nd or 3rb best forward.
Garland is KEY POSITION, 20 and played on the best Full Fowards all year in a sh1thouse team with a sh1thouse midfield. His stats are only a couple of points behind Richards, not that i judge defenders on stats alone.... Would you put Richards on Fevola or Franklin?
gold
he told me not to tell neone coz my dealer only sells to high paying customers who know their stuff....
Highlight the next line to reveal my Supplier
DYLZA94