The clubs from the South that I have heard they are targeting are Clarence, Glenorchy, North Hobart and................. KingboroughAnyone else catch the ABC News?
They reported on the Statewide league:
[*]It does not have the support of clubs in Tasmania(spoke to North Launceston and Clarence Presidents)
[*]AFL Tas has not consulted with the Clubs, rather told them what they say will be happening.
I've heard around the big graprevine likewise that clubs are not supportive of it because it will send them broke.
Things like bus fees would theoretically eat up most of the funding they'll each receive - around $50,000 each is the word around town.
Your second point is validated by comments made by Scott Wade when interviewed on ABC television during half time in the Devils game at Bellerive a couple of weeks back when asked by Andy Bennett as to how the reception from clubs was to the proposal, Wade stated "We haven't spoken to the clubs yet, they'll be the last ones we'll be speaking to about it."
I also heard that clubs would be more warming to the idea of a reformation of the TANFL, and playing a State Grand Final each year against the Northern premiers.
But as we all can work out, it aint about the clubs, it's all about the Devils - Again!
Here we go again LOL.roorat said:[*]Proposed League is one club representing each area such as Clarence on the Eastern Shore but not using the name Clarence and made up of best players from the Eastern Shore Clubs.
It'll be just like 1997-2000 in the TSFL/SWL with Micheal Kent's rediculous ideas at renaming clubs and changing council boundaries to suit themselves.
It failed miserably then, and we haven't got the base of fans to work with now, I can't see it becoming a success.
North Hobart is renamed 'Hobart Demons' and out walks 75% of its membership, New Norfolk is renamed 'Derwent Eagles' and crowds and membership plummet.
Devonport is pushed to jump on the Port Adelaide bandwagon and starts calling itself 'Port Power' - later forced to drop then name because they are using it illegally and end up being an even worse team than what Hobart descended into before they were excluded.
North Launceston changes its name to Northern Bombers and upsets its fans by doing so.
Southern Districts Cats is formed after the demise of Sandy Bay, technically it's a new club but most people can tell it's just Sandy Bay with a different jumper, emblem and slightly different set of colours.
Has the same supporters mostly, same players, many ex SBFC people running it - then the supporters finally cotton on that it's really not the same as the old Sandy Bay and start dropping off - it falls over within 18 months.
Seriously, can anyone really see a Clarence supporter (that hasn't switched allegiance to the higher profile Devils) or a Lauderdale supporter dropping their club allegiance and going to support the Eastern Shore Possums or whatever they'll call themselves?
Oh, of course he isn't interested in how the actual guinea pigs are feeling about it, because it isn't about them - it's about the Devils.roorat said:Commenting on the "luke warm" reception from the clubs Wade commented he is not concerned with how they receive it.
It's like asking the rooster in the barnyard if he feels like being eaten by a wild dog and accentuating the positives of it, when there's a wild dog standing behind you licking its lips waiting to devour the rooster.
It will happen, and there isn't anything the clubs can do about it - their mind's made up.
Hobart and New Norfolk are not interested and given that they were both axed from the original statewide league, they probably wouldn't be asked to join anyhow.
In Hobart's case they are in even worse shape than they were in 1997 (and it was very bad then), not so much in player numbers or debt (although they still have a fair bit) but with no people to help run it or support it.
The thing is, they can't get people to go and watch clubs that they have followed for generations previously now, how do they think they are going to get people to follow a whole bunch of newly concocted teams?
It seems lessons from history are never learnt.
An overly expensive waste of time, money and resources for very little productive result.roorat said:Devils(now for the good news)
[*]Unless the Devils receive a further $350,000 from the AFL the Devils will go into recession next year(yay) This is on top of the $700,000 extra they have already been promised.
Maybe they should start tightening their own belts rather pissing money away everywhere.
Also begs the question, if the game's governing body can't run ONE team which receives blanket media coverage, is able to hog sponsorships and resources for themselves at the expense of the rest of the sport in this state, used to produced decent crowds and is funded by the AFL - how the hell is a statewide league with traditionless teams going to work?