Certified Legendary Thread The absolute brilliance that is the C9 commentary team. CC: Brad McNamara

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Who the hell says "bossing"? (as in "Australia are bossing this match.") Certainly no one even half the age of these commentators and definitely no one who doesn't sound like a flog when he does say "bossing." Would have heard it 3 or 4 times today and cringed every time.
 
Apart from the rising inflection they is something weird about Michael Clarke's voice, it sounds like he is holding the microphone to close to his mouth or something. Really annoying.
I think clarke just has a really annoying voice.

Knows his stuff but does not have the voice for commentary
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I guess the kids aren't sick of them yet like most of us are.

To be fair they might be listening to ABC. But a lot of people do buy those things or use their phones for radio. I don't do it because I'm with people and also feel it takes away from the atmosphere and my phone battery sucks and I'm not shelling out for those headphone things.
 
The earpiece things are sold at the ground if i'm not mistakken. I think it was originally something Sky did during their summer tests.

I remember taking portable radios to the cricket used to be quite popular (not just earphones either)
Nothing like sitting on the grass bank of the WACA with the radio commentary going on in the background
 
Sam McClure said on 3aw last night that there was a huge argument at a dinner before the Adelaide Test between 2 ex-captains from the Ch 9 commentary team.
He hinted that it was Chappell and Clark, and said it was so nasty that other people intervened to spot it going further :D

McClure said it 20 mins into last night's show:

https://audioboom.com/publishing/pl...small&show_title=true&max_height=505px#Sports Today - Monday November 28
 
Far more painful than watching Australia lose the first two Tests was listening to Ian Chappell recall a story from his playing days during the Adelaide day-night match. He mentioned how an opposition player with the surname Boothill (we think that’s how it’s spelt) once advised him that a 40 not out would do the future Aussie captain no harm in a game earlier in his career. Chappell then cleverly used this anecdote as a segue into making the brave call that an unbeaten 40 from Matt Renshaw in the second innings run chase wouldn’t do the debutant any harm either.

No s***, Sherlock. I think we all could have figured out scoring 40 not out would be better than getting bowled for 11. The most interesting part of this commentary was actually Ian Healy trying to clarify Mr Boothill’s surname.
haha.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread The absolute brilliance that is the C9 commentary team. CC: Brad McNamara

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top