Banter The Adelaide Board Politics/COVID Thread Part 2 (WARNING NOT FOR THE FAINT-HEARTED)

[Eagleboy2011]

There is a glaring error in this tweet, has anyone else spotted it?

Are you saying Trump lost by 10,756 votes. He wasn't in the primaries.

 

[OneGreatClub]

 

[MrKK]

Changes nothing. They still shouldn’t have arrived at the conclusion that it would materially impede transmission if they had no evidence of that and especially if it hadn’t been tested at all. Why it wasn’t tested is entirely irrelevant. You need to stop clutching at straws.

I knew back when the vaccines were going through the emergency use approval process that they weren't tested for transmission. It was explicit in the testing documents, but I only knew because I followed people who'd read them and publicised that information.

If you got your entire vaccine information from government sources, MSM or the pharma companies' press releases then you'd have absolutely thought they stopped transmission.

 

[1970crow]

Extincting humans would be the best thing to ever happen to the rest of the species. Arguing any different is rampant stupidity. Unfortunately we’re not at risk and continue to increase our numbers. Want to make a difference, reverse that trend.

 

[1970crow]

I knew back when the vaccines were going through the emergency use approval process that they weren't tested for transmission. It was explicit in the testing documents, but I only knew because I followed people who'd read them and publicised that information.

If you got your entire vaccine information from government sources, MSM or the pharma companies' press releases then you'd have absolutely thought they stopped transmission.

I believed it. But I still didn’t support mandates, it was clear we’d hit our targets without it. Although, I initially got vaxxed because I felt my ability to live an ordinary life was going to be compromised.

 

[relapse]

Lol..if she got caught doing it in the primaries..you are going to have a very hard time convincing anyone this was isolated and could not have happened in the main election

So you spotted it.

The tweet itself claims that this was during the presidential election, but you only have to look the link he posted which specifically says that it happened in the Primaries.

I only have a superficial knowledge of the US election process and even I know the difference between the Primary and Presidential elections.

I'm not trying to enter into any debate, I just saw the tweet and couldn't believe a so called reporter could make such a glaring **** up like that.

 

[1970crow]

So you spotted it.

The tweet itself claims that this was during the presidential election, but you only have to look the link he posted which specifically says that it happened in the Primaries.

I only have a superficial knowledge of the US election process and even I know the difference between the Primary and Presidential elections.

I'm not trying to enter into any debate, I just saw the tweet and couldn't believe a so called reporter could make such a glaring * up like that.

Given the grammatical errors, you’d expect pretty much every form of ****up is on the table.

 

[Crow till I die]

Gutfeld nails it

 

[OneGreatClub]

Gutfeld nails it

Dream on princess

 

[Maddogmetro]

Yeah. You.

People were coerced to take a vaccine to continue putting food on the table and paying their mortgage.

A vaccine for which not all the relevant data had emerged.

Both of these principles violate informed consent.

From that peer reviewed study (which you didn’t read):

“It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally.”



It’s nice and convenient for you to pretend the “policy” decisions had nothing to do with the “science” when that premise was all we heard every single day for two and a half years.

The ”experts” recommended and backed the mandates based on “science” that the unvaccinated were a danger to others.

“Science” that turned out not to exist.

What is your opinion on the mandates? Do/did you agree with them or not?

You mean the study that you haven't read, have not critiqued, and have taken as the shining light of truth?

Ah yes, that one. Find the one study that supports your view, don't even read it, have no ability to understand it, and then hold it up as the beacon. Brilliant strategy.

And you have, once again, put words into my mouth. When have I said that policy decisions have nothing to do with science? I have not said any statement to this effect. You can repeat it over and over and over, but it does not change facts Slippery.

And the scientific benefits of mandates are well proven, whether or not you agree with them. As many people have repeated to you many times on this forum, and that you conveniently ignore, is that the vaccines did prevent transmission for early strains, and even after that mandates prevented the health system being even more overwhelmed than it already is. If you continue to ignore relevant information, that is on you.

 

[Maddogmetro]

LOL - its like a good old fashioned lynch mob that sham Jan 6th witch hunt. Totally partisan and already with heresay witnesses discredited. Why would anyone want to set themselves up for a perjury trap when there is no cross examination or real republican representation on board. Anyone still buying what it is selling is an absolute idiot but it seems most of the country has tuned out..(or more truthfully, never ever tuned in on it as they see it for what it is)

But what makes them even more of a wackjob idiot is how they now will defend Joe Biden getting caught red handed in a quid pro quo that is the same principle the democrats and their media lackeys went after Trump for and tried to impeach him on.

Still, 26 days till mid terms and a new republican controlled house and more and more likely republican held senate. Then let the real investigations begin and every normal sane person should be in the ear of every republican demanding them go after the corrupt democrats involved for the last 6 years in the fake impeachments, enabling the corrupt FBI to influence multiple elections in their favor etc.

Remember though - Jan 6th was one riot..what about the hundreds of BLM riots that never got a commission to investiage

You do enjoy this weird false equivalence obsession to justify an attempt to overthrow a validly elected government, don't you?

 

[Crow till I die]

You do enjoy this weird false equivalence obsession to justify an attempt to overthrow a validly elected government, don't you?

We have direct evidence the democrats (clinton campaign) via the FBI tried to overthrow the trump presidency by opening false investigations into his campaign, lying to fisa courts to get warrants, disposing if evidence, paying for false dossiers to set a narrative for false impeavhments etc

Can't have it both ways...

#insurrection

 

[OneGreatClub]

We have direct evidence the democrats (clinton campaign) via the FBI tried to overthrow the trump presidency by opening false investigations into his campaign, lying to fisa courts to get warrants, disposing if evidence, paying for false dossiers to set a narrative for false impeavhments etc

Can't have it both ways...

Oooo talks about direct evidence while ignoring all the actual durect evidence to the contrary.
Sort of funny how those only digest Fox news type media believe that it is they who have a hold on the truthn

 

[Crow till I die]

Oooo talks about direct evidence while ignoring all the actual durect evidence to the contrary.
Sort of funny how those only digest Fox news type media believe that it is they who have a hold on the truthn

but unfortunately for you and the absolute bottom shelf like you that refuse to accept the truth, the truth of the attempted takedown of the Trump presidency has come out via Durham..step by step

 

[Crow till I die]

Oooo talks about direct evidence while ignoring all the actual durect evidence to the contrary.
Sort of funny how those only digest Fox news type media believe that it is they who have a hold on the truthn

LOL..Hillary clinton innocent bwahahah..as corrupt as they come and protected by the FBI

Dismissed FBI agent changed Comey’s language on Clinton emails to ‘extremely careless’: report

The former FBI official, who was recently fired from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia team over messages critical of President Trump, reportedly edited a key phrase that&nbsp…

thehill.com

The former FBI official, who was recently fired from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia team over messages critical of President Trump, reportedly edited a key phrase that removed possible legal implications in former FBI Director James Comey’s statement about his decision on the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Peter Strzok, who served as a counterintelligence expert at the bureau, changed the description of Clinton’s actions in Comey’s statement, CNN reported Monday, citing U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

 

[OneGreatClub]

LOL..Hillary clinton innocent bwahahah..as corrupt as they come and protected by the FBI

Dismissed FBI agent changed Comey’s language on Clinton emails to ‘extremely careless’: report

The former FBI official, who was recently fired from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia team over messages critical of President Trump, reportedly edited a key phrase that&nbsp…

thehill.com

The former FBI official, who was recently fired from special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia team over messages critical of President Trump, reportedly edited a key phrase that removed possible legal implications in former FBI Director James Comey’s statement about his decision on the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Peter Strzok, who served as a counterintelligence expert at the bureau, changed the description of Clinton’s actions in Comey’s statement, CNN reported Monday, citing U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Just you wait…you are in for such a big shock to your extremely limited world view

 

[Slippery Pete]

You mean the study that you haven't read, have not critiqued, and have taken as the shining light of truth?

Ah yes, that one. Find the one study that supports your view, don't even read it, have no ability to understand it, and then hold it up as the beacon. Brilliant strategy.

And you have, once again, put words into my mouth. When have I said that policy decisions have nothing to do with science? I have not said any statement to this effect. You can repeat it over and over and over, but it does not change facts Slippery.

And the scientific benefits of mandates are well proven, whether or not you agree with them. As many people have repeated to you many times on this forum, and that you conveniently ignore, is that the vaccines did prevent transmission for early strains, and even after that mandates prevented the health system being even more overwhelmed than it already is. If you continue to ignore relevant information, that is on you.

But do you agree with them?

I must have asked you six times now.

 

[Crow till I die]

Just you wait…you are in for such a big shock to your extremely limited world view

 

[Slippery Pete]

 

[Crow till I die]

View attachment 1538039



View attachment 1538038

just imagine if that was Trump or anyone of the conservative side of politics touching and feeling a little girl - underage. They would be impeaching him for it

 

[OneGreatClub]

just imagine if that was Trump or anyone of the conservative side of politics touching and feeling a little girl - underage. They would be impeaching him for it

You have had a good idea for once….

 

[Crow till I die]

You have had a good idea for once….

so we have worked out you have never had your own kids then..its one thing to have your own daughter sit on your lap as a kid or to kiss your own kids..its something else to touch other peoples underage daughters..lol

Underage being the key word

 

[OneGreatClub]

Lol

so we have worked out you have never had your own kids then..its one thing to have your own daughter sit on your lap as a kid or to kiss your own kids..its something else to touch other peoples underage daughters..lol

Underage being the key word

Of course of course incest is much better

 

[Crow till I die]

Lol

Of course of course incest is much better

incest?..how do you mean. what so no parent ever can kiss their kids or sit their own kids on their lap..so the whole world is incest..you just kicked another own goal there. Shooting fish in a barrel

 

[OneGreatClub]

And then there’s his Epstein connections…ewwww.
I hope one day all perpetrators on all sides of Politics are brought to justice for their disgusting crimes.