Off-topic The Bay 13 Cricket thread - On the Windies bandwagon with Plugger. F*** India

Which Hogwarts house does Joe Root belong in?


  • Total voters
    176

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe Dar is the one who should have the OPSM sponsorship.

But Fyfie_ picked it ages ago, the Moo Clarke wasted his reviews for when they were necessary...

You sir, are a visionary.

Could have had Broad twice if not for that, the one he padded up would have been overturned.

Seriously, that review earlier was so bad you could almost call it a subtle form of match fixing. :thumbsdown:
 
I have done some investigating recently and I have come up with the best ashes side possible.
batsmen ............ Bowlers..................... Other
1 agar ........ First pace bowler agar ......... Sub fielder agar
2 agar ...... Second pace bowler agar ....... Commenters agar, agar and agar
3 agar........ Third pace bowler agar.......... Drink carrier David Warner
4 agar....... First spinner agar
5 agar........ Second spinner agar
6 agar ....... Part-time spinner agar
7 agar
8 agar
9 agar
10 agar
11 agar

Not enough Agar....
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Clarke's silly reviews hurt us last over. :thumbsdown:
This has been a problem since ponting was captain everytime we waste reviews haddin has given bad advice and it looks as though with swann and Anderson to bowl yet this could get them to safety
 
Patto_man is bowling hand grenades, yet Clarke goes for a desperation review. You just know we'll have one of them plumb now and it gets turned down.

Nice call. The Aussies always use the DRS badly, use it in hope of getting a wicket instead of for reversing the bad decision. Not sure I would be trusting Patto either when deciding to go for a review.

Siddle's comments just highlight Australia's attitude to the DRS:

Siddle also refused to concede that Australia had wasted their two referrals, particularly a leg before wicket appeal against Jonny Bairstow which was clearly not out.
"You can’t do anything about that. You use them because you think you’re going to get a result early on and you don’t," Siddle said.

"You can’t just hold them and put them in the back pocket and say `I’m going to get one in the afternoon’ and save it for that.
"You use them when you think there’s a chance of getting a wicket and that’s what they’re there for."

No you use them when you've had a bad decision against you, not in hope that you will get a wicket.
 
Nice call. The Aussies always use the DRS badly, use it in hope of getting a wicket instead of for reversing the bad decision. Not sure I would be trusting Patto either when deciding to go for a review.

Siddle's comments just highlight Australia's attitude to the DRS:



No you use them when you've had a bad decision against you, not in hope that you will get a wicket.

Siddle sadly can't come out and say "My captain's a f--kstick who has pigrooted what chances we had"
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nice call. The Aussies always use the DRS badly, use it in hope of getting a wicket instead of for reversing the bad decision. Not sure I would be trusting Patto either when deciding to go for a review.

Judging by Patto's reaction after the review was called, he appeared happy to let it go, he had a look of surprise on his face when they called it. Seemed all Haddin and Clarke to me.

No you use them when you've had a bad decision against you, not in hope that you will get a wicket.

I think Royals summed it up there, but still, at best that ball was going to be "umpires call", if you save your reviews for the howlers, such as the Trott decision (which he didn't hit), and the Broad one, then you should be alright.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top