TedDougChris
🏆 🦍
- Mar 10, 2007
- 52,545
- 98,137
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Charlton Athletic, Roys FFC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm unsure what you mean by "last night will keep happening".Successful clubs like Richmond dgaf about free kicks. That's the mindset Bulldogs need to consider otherwise last night will keep happening and Weightman's goals will dry up further.
Have you seen the chart that shows the correlation between free kicks and scores?
I'm happy to post it but trust me, there isn't a correlation, so it literally isn't an advantage to have more free kicks. With that being said, why does having more free kicks annoy you?
Pffft do you really think the AFL will move the most supported club in the country (as per Roy Morgan's indisputable survey)?It's clear as day a conspiracy against the Swans.
I'm calling it now, Swans to Tassie, to become the Tassie Whine and diners.
I am happy for all those to be paid...players will stop soon enough.
- Naughton holding - if all of those were paid - especially downfield, the game would turn into a bit of a farce. Attending games in person, that s**t happens all the time, and with comfortably more force than the one last night.
Does this really warrant a main board post? There's more than enough places to post this already, and it just comes across as needlessly sinking the boot in for mine.
From my biased observation I took issue with only 3 free kicks last night:
So there's 3 there and only 1 that I vehemently disagree with.
- Naughton holding - if all of those were paid - especially downfield, the game would turn into a bit of a farce. Attending games in person, that s**t happens all the time, and with comfortably more force than the one last night.
- JJ free for holding against Stephens - arguably there, but also could have been a free against JJ. 50-50 and should have been play on.
- Stephens running too far. But that was also 50-50 and only annoys me because you'll see players run close to 30 without getting pinged all the time, and looked like he ran 15m exactly by comparison.
For the most part, I thought the umpires stayed out of it last night, and I think if both teams are getting sub-20 free kicks per game for the rest of the season, we should be pretty happy with it.
I'd be happy if they weren't paid downfield, just think it's too harsh a price to pay when it will happen minimum dozens of times a game and the umpire won't see it.I am happy for all those to be paid...players will stop soon enough.
This game is hard enough to umpire as it is, asking umpires to determine force of the jumper tug before deciding just adds another grey area. It is against the rules so just pay it if you see it.
Also lol that this chart domain starts the YEAR AFTER the most umpire assisted finals series of all time.Yawn. "Where it matters most" (cliche Sydney fan logic), in actual fact it doesn't matter at all so probably not even worth the time to post about it.
View attachment 1442402
That is never going to happen. The AFL is very vested in growing the Sydney market. Pulling the Swans out would do massive damage to the AFL brand.Pffft do you really think the AFL will move the most supported club in the country (as per Roy Morgan's indisputable survey)?
You dare me? You realise the remaining 3 teams who made the prelims that year all had a negative free kick differential >-40 so the chart for that year won't show what you're hoping.Also lol that this chart domain starts the YEAR AFTER the most umpire assisted finals series of all time.
Run it for 2016. I dare you.
This is just the most stupid thing I have ever read in my life.Have you seen the chart that shows the correlation between free kicks and scores?
I'm happy to post it but trust me, there isn't a correlation, so it literally isn't an advantage to have more free kicks. With that being said, why does having more free kicks annoy you?
Check the graph mate, you’ve got eyes.This is just the most stupid thing I have ever read in my life.
But if there’s no scoring advantage, why do you care and what do you feel it’s an issue?I think the main issue is the Dogs are playing for frees to their own detriment.
It's a mindset and coaching issue.
That data is absolutely irrelevant.Check the graph mate, you’ve got eyes.
It's a shit spectacle from an entertainment point of view. Spoils enjoyment for the game being played properly.But if there’s no scoring advantage, why do you care and what do you feel it’s an issue?
The data that is irrelevant is the free kick differential ladder.That data is absolutely irrelevant.
I mean seriously, I'm sitting here with my head in my hands shaking with disbelief as to how utterly idiotic this 'data' is in terms of how you're interpreting it.
My god.
Why? We won a flag with this coach and played in a grand final last year. We’ve had a down season this year but you telling me your club has had a better six years since you choked in the grand final?It's a s**t spectacle. Spoils enjoyment for the game.
It's still cheating.
And Dogs fans should be concerned about the direction the coach hs taken this playing group.
When you walk through a shopping centre and see one of those extremely challenged and drug affected people causing a scene just remember, they to can purchase phones.This common mentality that free kicks should be distributed out evenly really highlights how poorly some people see the game tbh