if i'm thinking of the right example, was the JJ one where some melbourne player basically had the ball himself but was locking it inside? If my memory serves me correct initially JJ was tackled correctly and the ball was with JJ but he made no effort to get the ball out so the melb player locked it in waiting for a whistle. i see this paid all the time.
They’re lenient with everybody, they know it’s a dumb rule
Was a pretty clear missed 50 in the 4th against Dangerfield who took a step before play on was called after Khamis took a mark and feigned a handball. But we'll ignore that and only worry about the Dogs ones.
It's concerning for the Dogs, I must say.I wish the so-called “advantage” of more free kicks would result in more wins. They don’t seem to be doing us much good
Not really given there is no correlation between free kick discrepancy and wins, as the stats show.
Anyone who interprets that data that way is a fool.
Comprehension obviously not your strongpoint. I refer to your posts above about the Bulldogs' supposed 'advantage' from winning more free kicks than the opposition.
so you want to use statistics against Bulldogs but for Cats we will go on vibe
. 
Footscray Canterbury threw the ball all game last night.
I don't think you're grasping this.
That's a lot of words to just admit that you don't understand statistics.
I'd certainly hope I do.
You clearly don't, based on your above posts. Ironic that you're calling others fools and morons and then write that post above. Hilarious intact.
Thanks for the entertainment
I haven't found this entertaining at all.
You certainly embarrassed someone here. Way to out yourself.
If you believe every free kick paid is an advantage to the team receiving it you certainly are not correct.
