Clarko stopping Fev getting the 100 goal season?


  • Total voters
    219

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cool:)
So open slather on players not playing in the " best 22 " because they're coming back from injury.

Got it :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Cool:)
So open slather on players not playing in the " best 22 " because they're coming back from injury.

Got it :thumbsu:

It seems pretty clear you don't understand what 'best 22' actually means
 
It seems pretty clear you don't understand what 'best 22' actually means

I'd say it's your best 22 .....Polec is obviously not "best 22" as there has been 22 players selected ahead of him
Of course Crouch in the best 22 .... But he's coming back from injury ... Which is why he isn't in the best 22 this week:D

Why would you put your 23rd 24th 25th best players in your starting 22 ....??

Unless of course your " best" 22 are suspended ;)

But that's fine
Now we know
Any injured player not in the 22 that week due to injury can be the subject of ridicule-all good
 
facepalm.gif
 
I'd say it's your best 22 .....Polec is obviously not "best 22" as there has been 22 players selected ahead of him
Of course Crouch in the best 22 .... But he's coming back from injury ... Which is why he isn't in the best 22 this week:D

Why would you put your 23rd 24th 25th best players in your starting 22 ....??

Unless of course your " best" 22 are suspended ;)

But that's fine
Now we know
Any injured player not in the 22 that week due to injury can be the subject of ridicule-all good

giphy_zpsufcqmhpt.gif
 
Thrill me with your acumen

What is your definition of best 22?

I can't believe I'm doing this...

Your best 22 is the best possible side your club could hypothetically put on the park - regardless of injury, suspension, even current form.
It is why you will find 'best 22's' are often even discussed in the preseason, before a ball is even bounced.

Therefore, someone asking whether 'Fatty' Crouch is in your best 22 cannot possibly be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'suck shit Fatty Crouch your hammies are weaker than Troy Chaplin in a marking contest', then that would be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'Fatty Crouch isn't playing because his hamstrings gave way carrying his lard arse around the Rundle Mall food court', that could potentially be an injury troll. But then again maybe not, because he does look kinda fat.

Got it?
 
I can't believe I'm doing this...

Your best 22 is the best possible side your club could hypothetically put on the park - regardless of injury, suspension, even current form.
It is why you will find 'best 22's' are often even discussed in the preseason, before a ball is even bounced.

Therefore, someone asking whether 'Fatty' Crouch is in your best 22 cannot possibly be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'suck shit Fatty Crouch your hammies are weaker than Troy Chaplin in a marking contest', then that would be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'Fatty Crouch isn't playing because his hamstrings gave way carrying his lard arse around the Rundle Mall food court', that could potentially be an injury troll. But then again maybe not, because he does look kinda fat.

Got it?

You might be better off posting the spiningdog.gif and then she will realise what you are trying to explain
 
I can't believe I'm doing this...

Your best 22 is the best possible side your club could hypothetically put on the park - regardless of injury, suspension, even current form.
It is why you will find 'best 22's' are often even discussed in the preseason, before a ball is even bounced.

Therefore, someone asking whether 'Fatty' Crouch is in your best 22 cannot possibly be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'suck shit Fatty Crouch your hammies are weaker than Troy Chaplin in a marking contest', then that would be an injury troll.

If someone had said 'Fatty Crouch isn't playing because his hamstrings gave way carrying his lard arse around the Rundle Mall food court', that could potentially be an injury troll. But then again maybe not, because he does look kinda fat.

Got it?

Crouch obviously would be best 22 if he wasn't injured ....
The flog claimed Polec was best 22 - well this week he isn't !
The difference between ridiculing Polec - because he is hopelessly out of form and omitted from an already weak side and having a crack at Crouch not playing this week is the injury.


Heppell in your best 22?
Let's lay shit on his ability coz he's unable to play.
Injury trolling - like beauty - is in the eye of the beholder.
 
Seriously, there's not even a hint of an injury troll there.

You mustn't know Nelso very well.

We have released a statement saying that Crouch will train with the reserves and if he pulls up ok from his leg injury he will play rather than being rushed back into the AFL side. Obvious enough for everyone except Port trolls who have implied he is too fat to make the AFL side. But very well..

Why is fatty White not playing for Port this weekend?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Well now I'm really ****ing pissed.

First my swear thread gets deleted even though its the best thread ever created in the history of bigfooty, then ****ing prince dies and NOW, I find out that yet another Exer has been dropped. ****ing Henderspud, Hamspud and looks like we won't be seeing Drink n Drive either as he failed a ****ing fitness test.

FML
 
You mustn't know Nelso very well.

We have released a statement saying that Crouch will train with the reserves and if he pulls up ok from his leg injury he will play rather than being rushed back into the AFL side. Obvious enough for everyone except Port trolls who have implied he is too fat to make the AFL side. But very well..

Why is fatty White not playing for Port this weekend?

Are you suggesting the mod is a liar masher? :rolleyes:

Keep sooking loose cannon :)
 
What would you do? Your one shot at glory.

(Explain the lewd act you wanna act upon a Swans player. But don't justify it. I will)
 
Cats/Power - thats as bad as it gets skills wise... some embarrassing efforts mainly from the Power but Geelong aside from Danger and Selwood were just awful.
Both sides a non factor this year for mine...thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top