News the double deal?

What would you prefer?

  • Kelly, minus our first round pick and second round pick

    Votes: 42 35.0%
  • Martin, but we keep our first round pick and second round pick

    Votes: 62 51.7%
  • Neither, spend money on our own list

    Votes: 16 13.3%

  • Total voters
    120

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you are wrong on that.

I know people will, but it's my poll.

Also, whilst it is technically feasible, you also have to factor in that we will want to re-sign players over the next while. Anyway, this sort of debate can go in another thread, but I think our club will choose one or the other. And I'm curious whether the extra 5 years Kelly gives us is better than losing our draft picks.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sorry to crash in on your parade, but the Club IS going for both....no ifs or buts.....

Of course we have put offers for both. It would be insane to put offers to one person each trading period. But if one says 'yes' it changes things.
 
Of course we have put offers for both. It would be insane to put offers to one person each trading period. But if one says 'yes' it changes things.

no it doesnt. we are going for both. we have the cap space, and have front ended a lot of our current lists contracts. this has been in planning for a long time
 
It all depends on our cap structure.

We can bank an amount how much that amount is, is absolutely critical to how we can get it done.

If we could front load a shit load (like $2m each) in the first year then yeah we take an almighty hit next year prior to returning to somewhere near normal programming.

You factor the cap increase and it's well within the realms of possibilities that both can happen and we can retain the ability to give players appropriate increases.

If the bean counters get both trades to happen and we do not root ourselves in the process it'll be some of the most astute list management the competition will have seen.
 
We currently have the ability to offer up to around 3m to new signings.

Currently we have around 2.2 (Assuming we've upped our offer to Kelly) of that on the table to Kelly and Martin.

We can and will target both, not just one.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Id love for us to get martin just to watch the meltdowns of all these wanks saying why go to a nothing club like north etc the tears from richmond supporters would be sweet haha
 
What people are forgetting here is that the J. Kelly $1mill p/a deal will probably be a base deal of $700k with the remainder to be subsidised ala TV show deal or a Physio Assistant position with the Groin guru to the vicinity of $300k p/a.

Remember the Judd deal where he was getting paid $400k p/a by visy as a Storeman for working 4 hours per week. $2000 p/hr is pretty good money ;)
Sorry but i only work with adequately trained people. Kelly would have to do a 4 year degree before given that sort of work. We could pay him in kanga-tech shares instead.
 
Was reading through the facecrap post today on martin and the meltdown on no way north can afford two players on 1m. Amusing reading
 
Come and be a North supporter Hans.
QONVIyz.gif

Very cheeky
 
Yeah but what would adding "both" achieve? Obviously we want both!

Everyone would just vote for that.

Very interesting this board obviously rates Kelly a lot higher than Martin
 
I would be happy to get one after this build up to get to September and get none well that is a different matter all,together.
 
Yeah but what would adding "both" achieve? Obviously we want both!

Everyone would just vote for that.

Very interesting this board obviously rates Kelly a lot higher than Martin

they are different types of players. one is silky smooth, with awesome foot skills, and the other is brute strength, goal kicking mid. we need both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top