- Banned
- #176
Also, we aren't going to afford both. Sorry guys that isn't an option.
So there are the options, what would you prefer?
I think you are wrong on that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Also, we aren't going to afford both. Sorry guys that isn't an option.
So there are the options, what would you prefer?
I think you are wrong on that.
Sorry to crash in on your parade, but the Club IS going for both....no ifs or buts.....
Of course we have put offers for both. It would be insane to put offers to one person each trading period. But if one says 'yes' it changes things.
Yep.We might get either we might get neither but we're definitely trying for both.
Sorry but i only work with adequately trained people. Kelly would have to do a 4 year degree before given that sort of work. We could pay him in kanga-tech shares instead.What people are forgetting here is that the J. Kelly $1mill p/a deal will probably be a base deal of $700k with the remainder to be subsidised ala TV show deal or a Physio Assistant position with the Groin guru to the vicinity of $300k p/a.
Remember the Judd deal where he was getting paid $400k p/a by visy as a Storeman for working 4 hours per week. $2000 p/hr is pretty good money
So they are illiterate too.Was reading through the facecrap post today on martin and the meltdown on no way north can afford two players on 1m. Amusing reading
Yeah but what would adding "both" achieve? Obviously we want both!
Everyone would just vote for that.
Very interesting this board obviously rates Kelly a lot higher than Martin
I expect we'd be using the offer to the other in our recruiting pitch to each player.