Goedy
Club Legend
Pffffffft Superbowl caliber, unlikely..... Theres now 2 QB's in the divison better than cutler. Rivers and Cassel. Broncos wont be in the playoffs fr a while to come.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Cassel >> CutlerPffffffft Superbowl caliber, unlikely..... Theres now 2 QB's in the divison better than cutler. Rivers and Cassel. Broncos wont be in the playoffs fr a while to come.
Cassel >> Cutler
Not sure about that one.
Well, it is Mizza, he's not exactly known for deep, insightful knowledge of the sport...
If the Packers didn't already have a young, potentially Superbowl-calibre Qb, I would be sending non stop letters to Ted T to try and get Cutler righr ****in now...
Im pretty sure i know a lot more about NFL than you think fuey, i don't know what your problem is with me but i would like to know????Well, it is Mizza, he's not exactly known for deep, insightful knowledge of the sport...
If the Packers didn't already have a young, potentially Superbowl-calibre Qb, I would be sending non stop letters to Ted T to try and get Cutler righr ****in now...
lol. The only person that seems to agree with you is Mel Kiper. And that's not a good thing.Pffffffft Superbowl caliber, unlikely..... Theres now 2 QB's in the divison better than cutler. Rivers and Cassel. Broncos wont be in the playoffs fr a while to come.
Im pretty sure i know a lot more about NFL than you think fuey, i don't know what your problem is with me but i would like to know????
Edit: Attention whores. Can we just red card em?
OK, the Jay Cutler-Denver Broncos situation has taken a step back.
The two sides spoke via conference call Monday and according to a source familiar with the phone call, it did not go well.
The conversation was supposed to be a clearing of the air after the Broncos engaged in trade talks Feb. 28. However, the rift grew bigger when the phone conversation became contentious.
Sources said the Broncos approached Cutler as if he was the one who started the trade talks and informed him that they have no plans of trading him but that they can trade him at any time.
The next step in this saga will be Monday when the Broncos start their offseason workout program. A source close to the situation said Cutler has not decided if he will attend or not. If he doesn't it will be a clear sign to the Broncos that there are legitimate problems.
The Broncos will be in trouble if Cutler isn't there because the team needs all of its players, particularly its quarterback, to be present to start the Josh McDaniels era. It is a new system and if Cutler is not there for every minute of the offseason, even the conditioning portion, the team will take a major step backward.
If Cutler doesn't show up, it could prompt Denver to renew trade talks. The problem for Denver is that it has no answers other than Cutler at quarterback. New backup quarterback Chris Simms isn't the answer.
If Denver does end up trading Cutler it will need to either get a quarterback in return (who?) or get a high draft choice and pick a rookie quarterback. That would be starting over.
However, after the latest turn in this saga, starting over might be easier.
It seems what most bothers Cutler after the conference call is that Denver is treating him as if he was the one who initiated this saga. There is a major trust issue, and if Cutler decides not to show up for offseason workouts Monday, there will be another rift in this already tense situation.
The Broncos may want it to be over, but it is nowhere near being over.
So you'd be the first one then
I'm beginning to get sick of Cutler's petulance here. Basically all McDaniels has stated is that 'anyone is tradable at the right price'. I applaude McD for not going in there and sucking up to him because he's not being honest with himself, Cutler, or the organisation. Half the team has been cut, Scheffler is up for trade and Cutler seems to think its all about him. Just get over it, move on and rock up to workouts on Monday....
Exactly what I was thinking.Well said, camsmith. It's very easy to see thru McDaniels' bs. What a bonehead he turned out to be so far. Lance II.
Disagree, TGBB. There's none more important or more hard to nail position than QB. It's lunacy if a HC were to think, "ok ive got a franchise QB for 10 years, but i need a SS, a nickel back, an OLB. So i better trade him away for a back-up QB instead."
Firstly, that doesnt even solve all those positions of need to get a straight QB-for-QB swap. And secondly, if you have a franchise QB you hold onto them for dear life and build your team around them.
What a 'Lance' josh is. I dont mind, let him trade Cutler away. I just cant believe the lunacy and the deep-seated agenda (i want acclaim for being a genius offensive mind by creating a gun from a noob rather than inheriting a top-flight QB).
Well said, camsmith. It's very easy to see thru McDaniels' bs. What a bonehead he turned out to be so far. Lance II.
Exactly what I was thinking.
I thought you would be happy about this. Watching McDaniels destroy the Broncos from the inside. Just makes the Raiders life a bit easier.
Wasn't saying straight swap with a back up QB, that would make no sense at all. I'm saying swap Cutler with a high pick with possibly a player or two (defence?OL?). And that maybe McDaniels thinks he can bring in another lesser known QB, possibly a veteran to do a Cassel-like job.
Don't necessarily agree because I rate Cutler highly, but just saying that could be his thinking. Either that or McDaniels has no idea.