Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn’t it clear from the outset?
About time.QLD Government wanting to get ahead of the Sky News Shandee's Story special on Tuesday night (8pm AEST).
Queensland at a glance: premier flags ‘big announcement’ over DNA test issues
This week’s Queensland news in brief: action over forensics lab, discrimination law slammedwww.theguardian.com
'Fri 3 Jun 2022 12.52 AEST'
'Queensland’s premier, Annastacia Palaszczuk, has hinted at “a very big announcement” about the government’s forensic lab, after widespread concerns were raised about the facility.
Revelations of DNA-testing problems at the state-run forensics lab have prompted police to review sexual assault cases dating back to 2018 and Palaszczuk says “it changes everything”.
“In light of all those new revelations, I think you’ll see a very big announcement on Monday,” Palaszczuk said on Friday.'
Or there is some degree of corrupt or criminal behavior/actions by someone in the labs.That either means that the equipment/software isn't working or the testing procedures are wrong.
No, labs aren't advised what samples are when they are delivered, just the analyses requested.The thing that gets me with this is not the fact they had higher levels of testing than NSW, it is that they weren't getting profiles from Shandee's blood or from the John Peros' car in their first round of testing. That either means that the equipment/software isn't working or the testing procedures are wrong.
I am not sure if when a lab technician gets a sample if they are told what the sample is or whether they would expect to get DNA from the sample. If you don't know what your expectations are when examining a sample, then you may not know that not finding DNA is wrong, however this may depend on the experience of the person testing.
I tell you what Hedley Thomas would want to be certain that both Chris Dawson and John Peros are guilty because his "investigative research" is leaving him wiiiiide open for an absolute legal shitfight soon.
Hedley has the might of News Corp and the blessing of it's Murdoch family controllers behind him.
Legal action taken related to his podcasts or media interviews/comments will be against his media employer, not him personally.
Australian media organisations have frequently shown that they are not always afraid to risk company/shareholders $$$ and reputations in producing things that might result in defamation cases. They probably have budget and contingency for this, as part of their financial forecasts.
More like any legal action leading him and his media employer (even if he is not an 'employee' of theirs) wide open to getting even more readers, listeners and viewers, of their past, present and future, true crime stuff, from any defamation legal action publicity.
'‘I was staggered’: Untold horror of Shandee’s frenzied murder revealed'
'June 1, 2022 - 12:01PM'
'“It’s frustrating that I can’t get to all these cases,” the double Gold Walkley Award-winning journalist tells The Binge Guide. “I write back to everybody saying, ‘Look, I’m interested [in helping]. I have a file of these cases that I’m hoping to revisit but for the time being, I can’t.’”
It was among those requests that Thomas first came across the story of Shandee Blackburn'
'After six months of research, Thomas launched Shandee’s Story, a serial podcast for The Australian that has already chalked up four million downloads.'
'While he can’t find answers for every family, Thomas takes comfort in knowing that true-crime podcasts, documentaries and even drama series create awareness.
These stories are also reframing the narrative for Blackburn and Janine Vaughan (whose disappearance Thomas investigated in his podcast The Night Driver) so these women become the centre of their own stories and not just anonymous victims.
He also wishes more journalists would follow his lead with cold-case investigations.'
'“With this long-form [reporting], I know the material and the witnesses and the experts who come out of the woodwork and shed light on things that they’ve heard in these episodes can make an enormous difference,” he says.
“And I’m really hopeful that in Shandee’s Story, we will crack the case.”'
I tell you what Hedley Thomas would want to be certain that both Chris Dawson and John Peros are guilty because his "investigative research" is leaving him wiiiiide open for an absolute legal shitfight soon.
Whilst Hedley has uncovered something's let's not forget he is a clickbait journo. Personally I can't see either of JP or CD ending up with a conviction based on what we know
As I wrote in a previous post, it is the lack of the use of standards to ensure that the instruments and methods are performing within an acceptable range that is the issue. Also, analyses are also best run blinded (when possible) to help reduce unconscious bias. These are the fundamentals of sound and reproducible scientific analyses. As you say, the technicians were running the samples and just reported the results up the chain.The thing that gets me with this is not the fact they had higher levels of testing than NSW, it is that they weren't getting profiles from Shandee's blood or from the John Peros' car in their first round of testing. That either means that the equipment/software isn't working or the testing procedures are wrong.
I am not sure if when a lab technician gets a sample if they are told what the sample is or whether they would expect to get DNA from the sample. If you don't know what your expectations are when examining a sample, then you may not know that not finding DNA is wrong, however this may depend on the experience of the person testing.
Now waiting for the actual wording of the terms of reference of the Commission of Inquiry, when/if they have been locked in, or even proposed in draft for public release and consultation (maybe).
Warning: Beautiful one day, perfect the next only applies to the Queensland Weather.there seems to have been no benchmarking to other jurisdictions/research labs.
Next week on Monday. Not today.Public hearings begin next Monday.