Chadwiko
@ChadwikoTWW
- Sep 25, 2004
- 23,153
- 38,826
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Washington Commanders, Boston Celtics
And to answer your question...
(Proceeds to not actually answer the question)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
And to answer your question...
Also weird that someone who claims everyone should vote Yes associates the concept of treaties with conspiracy theorist cookers.
You asked me if I was a sovereign citizen cooker. I said wtte of "Not only do I know a few, I've never cooked them."(Proceeds to not actually answer the question)
(Hint, if I'd said "never cooked any of us" you could assume I was one.)
Maybe they read the Mabo decision properly too.Nope, you're conflating the wrong parts.
Fully support the process of treaty - I have actually worked quite closely on parts of the ongoing state-level treaty process here in Victoria.
Suggesting that Australia is illegitimate as a modern nation state because the British documents they signed in the 1800s establishing Australia were invalid? That's straight out of the sov-cit playbook though.
You asked me if I was a Sovereign Citizen cooker....so in your mind, if I said the following;
"I've known a few Jews, but I've never cooked one" you would take that to mean I'm not Jewish?
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaah I don't think you should be the one criticising anyone's "comprending" here, pal.
Maybe they read the Mabo decision properly too.
blah blah blah
Ohhh I get it. You couldn't just say "sovereign citizens". You had to add some form of bigoted signifier implying their brains are cooked. I thought we'd moved beyond stigmatising the mentally ill to be honest.
Do you see a difference between Sinwar, Begin and Shamir and if you do can you actually justify it?
This wall of text really goes a long way to providing cover for sovereign citizens. Some of which it sounds like you're mates with.
Hmm.
And now you're defending them.
And you still haven't come out and actually denied being a sovereign citizen, either.
At first I was just shit-talking but now I'm starting to have legitimate concerns about you.
Sure, there's differences.
I mean, all three are horrible.
But there's differences.
For example, Begin and Shamir were both democratically elected by their citizenry. Sinwar was never democratically elected by Palestinians for any position of power.
When did they do this?Despite their obvious issues and their role in various conflicts and acts in their various histories (the 1948 war, assassinations, etc), both Begin and Shamir demonstrated a willingness to find peaceful solutions with Palestine. Sinwar, on the other hand, repeatedly stated his only goal was the total eradication of Israel, and a total refusal to engage in any reconcililation efforts.
Just a couple of differences, off the top of my head.
What point? You missed my point entirely and it seems the entire article.
Yeah, take the hint the first 3 times I ignored you;
I'm not playing your bullshit little 'gotcha' games with bad-faith questions.
I loved (and still do) Propaghandi when I was an angsty little teenager too. Saw them live multiple times, and have drunkenly sung Bro Hymn arm-in-arm with mates too many times to count.
But modern politics are slightly more complicated than you'd know if you base your worldview on their lyrics.
Is this how you avoid answering difficult questions about the difference between Begin, Shamir and Sinwar?
Also weird that someone who claims everyone should vote Yes associates the concept of treaties with conspiracy theorist cookers.
Ths point is AUKUS is a giant scam to begin with, as I've repeatedly said. Try and keep uo
So to those kids he wasn't a terrorist but a freedom fighter.
He's only a terrorist is you situate you worldview as opposed to the Palestinian struggle against occupation and genocide imo.
If you came up with stupid nicknames for people who suffer some form of mental illness or at the very least have some form of neurodivergence but didn't express it thru weird politics everyone would rightly think you were a ****wit. Because these people basically hold a harmless political philosophy you think its okay to shit on them.
Even the feds designate them "mostly harmless".
They're not Nazis, they don't advocate violence against people or even the government. They just ignore it in the hope it'll go away. But you want to attack them - you're as cooked as they are.
That’s not what the article is about though.
The CRS’s entire function is to provide scenarios to congress of absolutely every possibility and option, no matter how unlikely. Some of their papers are absolutely batshit and never a real consideration, they are there purely to “cover all bases”.
The Australian media take them for gospel (and apparently you) which shows they don’t really understand the discussion.
Now this particular paper provides an alternative option and suggests simply increasing the number of US and UK subs already agreed to be operated out of Australian sub bases and pivot the entire Australian owned and operated sub spend to B-21’s, drones and next gen missiles so as not to impact on the subs per year being delivered to the US Navy’s requirements.
The B-21 program is probably even more sensitive than the Virginia sub program. They never shared the F-22 program with anyone, it’s highly unlikely they would with the B-21 program.
Now how exactly would that be a scam?
The only risk to AUKUS is Donald Trump.
It’s ok to admit you don’t understand this topic.
Yeah agree with that. Probably went through some terrible things to turn into who he was, but it doesn’t change that who he turned into was a monster responsible for killing innocent people including children.