
- Sep 10, 2010
- 17,400
- 24,079
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
And speaking of waste, Dutton is blatantly lying about how much his reactors will produce.Also I haven't seen any costing for proper and permanent nuclear waste disposal from the libs.
Is this included in the proposal?
This doesn't seem to figure in the discussion in the press at all.
Usually nuclear proponents forget to cost this. It always is vastly more expensive than expectations. In fact it's so difficult and expensive almost no nuclear waste has been stored properly anywhere in the world. The US has tens of thousand of tons of waste in temporary 'intermediate storage' awaiting a solution.
![]()
As nuclear waste piles up, scientists seek the best long-term storage solutions
Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN): Keeping you up to date with the chemistry news that matters most. Published by the American Chemical Society.cen.acs.org
“It’s a societal problem that has been handed down to us from our parents’ generation,” says Frankel, who is a materials scientist at the Ohio State University. “And we are—more or less—handing it to our children.”
Dutton said a reactor’s waste would fill a Coke can. Try 27,000 of them
Australia would face a big nuclear waste task under the opposition’s energy policy, which would generate hundreds of barrels of spent nuclear fuel a year.