The on topic thread 3.0

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aaaaand there we have the moronic comeback.

Just the fact you came up with that utterly dumb arse comparison of linking animal habits to humans and then dismissing the same kind of dumb logic when thrown back at you shows you're one of those clowns who throws the word homophobia around like you have fu** all idea what it means.

It's your go to when you get triggered.

Personally i'd rather be locked in a room full of gays than in a room full of Leeds fans.
Is this comparison really necessary?

Like saying I'd rather cut my hand off than my foot, as if one is better than the other.

You're an awful human being.
 
Is this comparison really necessary?

Like saying I'd rather cut my hand off than my foot, as if one is better than the other.

You're an awful human being.

Your take is shit.

You actually prove Dave Chappelle is spot on.

You read one bit, and having **** all sense of humour never assume it's a joke, you assume that it can only mean one thing and that's the only view you can hold.

Well done on your virtue singalling Nanette.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Beat man into space…got to pay the Joy Division reference though

View attachment 1269759


I believe you are wrong.

This chap called Gordon was filmed in space in 1954.

FlashGordon1936-02.png
 
Your take is sh*t.

You actually prove Dave Chappelle is spot on.

You read one bit, and having fu** all sense of humour never assume it's a joke, you assume that it can only mean one thing and that's the only view you can hold.

Well done on your virtue singalling Nanette.
Want to joke about the Jews next? Or maybe the blacks? Hispanics?
 
Want to joke about the Jews next? Or maybe the blacks? Hispanics?

Yeah I love Mel Brooks works. You'd never get through Blazing Saddles or The Producers with your sensitive nature. You might implode on hearing Springtime for Hitler.

The irony is you're being offended on someone else's behalf.

Stephen Fry would offend you no doubt with his views, he'd also wreck you in a debate.
 
Homosexual behaviour has been recorded in over 450 species, homophobia has only ever been recorded in one. There is nothing innate or natural about homophobia, it's learnt

Maths is also not innate - it’s learnt. Neither is writing. What point are you trying to make here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Maths is also not innate - it’s learnt. Neither is writing. What point are you trying to make here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What point are you trying to make..? That homophobia is as useful as maths?
 
What point are you trying to make..? That homophobia is as useful as maths?

No. I’m just trying to figure out why something that isn’t ‘innate’ as you say can be viewed in a negative light.

It’s like you want to control how other people think and feel, and if it’s different to you, than that = bad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
No. I’m just trying to figure out why something that isn’t ‘innate’ as you say can be viewed in a negative light.

It’s like you want to control how other people think and feel, and if it’s different to you, than that = bad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Different isn't bad. But homophobia sure is and I'm not sure why you're trying to defend discrimination against gay people
 
No. I’m just trying to figure out why something that isn’t ‘innate’ as you say can be viewed in a negative light.

It’s like you want to control how other people think and feel, and if it’s different to you, than that = bad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you think that homophobia isn't inherently bad? Interesting, care to expand on why that is?
 
So you think that homophobia isn't inherently bad? Interesting, care to expand on why that is?

Perhaps I am reading the conversation wrong. I find homophobia abhorrent. By saying being homosexual wasn’t normal I was assuming that was whoever posted it being homophobic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Perhaps I am reading the conversation wrong. I find homophobia abhorrent. By saying being homosexual wasn’t normal I was assuming that was whoever posted it being homophobic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But the person you were quoting was saying homophobia wasn't normal.. the person in question was the one making the point that homosexuality is normal.
 
But the person you were quoting was saying homophobia wasn't normal.. the person in question was the one making the point that homosexuality is normal.

Yeah I read that as homosexuality wasn’t normal. My bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 


Bless him and his hard times


The picture on the left, he looks full of hope for the future. Yes - he is thinking - we might be getting ****ed by our city rivals 6-1 but we still have Sir Alex Ferguson managing us and we are one of the favourites for the league. Chalk it up to a terrible loss to a very good side and move on.

The picture on the right, he looks like he is about to perform harakiri. He is thinking that this won't be the worst it will get, there will be even shitter times ahead because the club is full of sentiment where Ole is concerned.
 
Homosexuality been around forever.. open in ancient times. Greek mythology full of it…Zeus, Apollo etc. which of course implies it was quite common at the time in real life.

Btw we share similar DNA as animals. 25% of the DNA sequence in the dog genome exactly matches the human sequence…woof!
Roman and Greek warriors use to sleep with each other on their battles 🤷‍♂️
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top