- May 6, 2009
- 10,642
- 25,658
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
10 was just a random point with a decent sample size (plus I couldnt be bothered looking up exactly how many years weve had 18 sides for), and it'd still be more accurate than 7.1 will be.
Go 15 or 20 years if you like, it'd be much the same I'd imagine.
Why stop there?
The point is that you have the answer that you want- and are then going back through the historical data to confirm what you want to hear.
What if going back 30 years contradicts the answer you want to hear?
Your solution to simply only then use 10/15/20 years of data (ie the data that supports what you want to hear) is a classic example of how you can use statistics to "prove" anything