The Stadium!

What kind of stadium do you want?


  • Total voters
    135

Remove this Banner Ad

It looks like they're is plenty of corporates interested in sponsoring the Tassie Devils according to an article in the Examiner today.

The membership numbers, not just in Tassie, make sponsoring pretty attractive. Being a foundation sponsor will have a good deal traction too. That membership drive has been so important to help the support for the stadium, with sponsors being attracted too, that will help ensure the stadium will get built.
Is there going to be a naming sponsor? Is that in the financials? (no need for anyone to answer, just throwing it out there that there will be money coming in).
 
Sorry, couldn’t find a York Park thread. Sorry if this has already been discussed.

Investigate if its possible to move the tree... if not, can a design be made to accomodate it... if not, can the facility be built elswhere (& feature be made of the tree)... if not, get the chain saw...
 
You can have 23 games with 19 teams, it requires all teams will have 2 byes and will take 25 weeks to play. (19 weeks to play the other 18 clubs once + a bye each, then 4 games + 1 bye for each club over 5 weeks).
Odd number of teams mathematically requires each team to play an even number of games. When they go to 19 teams, they'll need to either move back to a 22 game season, or increase to 24.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You can have 23 games with 19 teams, it requires all teams will have 2 byes and will take 25 weeks to play. (19 weeks to play the other 18 clubs once + a bye each, then 4 games + 1 bye for each club over 5 weeks).

I think there will be memberships for Hobart, Launceston and for both venues - I hope the priority is for the seperate memberships initially. Away team allocations will be interesting too.

I am pleased with standing room for 2 reasons. Firstly I just think its something good to have. Second, it might be quicker and cheaper to add some extra capacity if needed.
Incorrect. As Tilt says.

Think about the umber of byes each week. You need 38 byes and that is not possible with an odd number of rounds.
 
Incorrect. As Tilt says.

Think about the umber of byes each week. You need 38 byes and that is not possible with an odd number of rounds.
You are right. Lowest number of weeks to play 11 home games for each team is 24 weeks (as happened in 1991 when the Crows joined).
So... either 2 gather rounds or none...? Hmmm, I wonder which way the AFL will jump. (this year we had a 25 week season with opening round + 24 rounds).
 
Investigate if its possible to move the tree... if not, can a design be made to accomodate it... if not, can the facility be built elswhere (& feature be made of the tree)... if not, get the chain saw...

Geelongs stadium was built in a d shape to accommodate trees……which largely are no longer there

Elm trees can go 150 years, half that if the many diseases hit
 
Everyone has their price it seems

I think it shows that they have been offered a nice deal from the Mac 2 consortium if this is anything to go by. They certainly don't have a short list of requests, so it will be very interesting to see what deal they could come to.
 
Last edited:
Everyone has their price it seems

They have left themselves wide open here.
Any leverage or integrity they thought they may of had has been lost.
 
It looks like it's largely money driven for them. I wonder if they really care about the sightlines being effected at all after hearing this.
Sounds to me like a very clumsy and poorly handled way of saying we'll support this if we get something out of it.

On SM-S906E using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Sounds to me like a very clumsy and poorly handled way of saying we'll support this if we get something out of it.

On SM-S906E using BigFooty.com mobile app
They definitely don't have a shortage of requests. I think the one where they want recognition at every event played there is interesting. I will say I'm disappointed to see they will still put money before the veterans of this state.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You are right. Lowest number of weeks to play 11 home games for each team is 24 weeks (as happened in 1991 when the Crows joined).
So... either 2 gather rounds or none...? Hmmm, I wonder which way the AFL will jump. (this year we had a 25 week season with opening round + 24 rounds).
There'll be two.

They'll either extend opening northern states round to a wider gather round, say Sydney (play seven games there while Brisbane and GC can play their home games in their states), or have a Tasmanian gather round to celebrate their entry in the league, give the new Tassie team a 12th game in the state, and to give more use to the stadium and tourism to justify the spend on the stadium in the first place. Both are common sense extensions of what they're already done.
 
There'll be two.

They'll either extend opening northern states round to a wider gather round, say Sydney (play seven games there while Brisbane and GC can play their home games in their states), or have a Tasmanian gather round to celebrate their entry in the league, give the new Tassie team a 12th game in the state, and to give more use to the stadium and tourism to justify the spend on the stadium in the first place. Both are common sense extensions of what they're already done.
I reckon the non Vic clubs will get and extra home game. Opening round will be hosted by those nine clubs. Plus Gather Round. Leaves three extra neutral games to be play somewhere.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Stadium!

Back
Top