eddiebankbalance
Norm Smith Medallist
- Banned
- #51
Un ****ing fortunately, i was inthe shit ****ing city. All I saw was pretty dolphines in the r i v e r.You poor bugger.
How did you live on all that sand?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Un ****ing fortunately, i was inthe shit ****ing city. All I saw was pretty dolphines in the r i v e r.You poor bugger.
How did you live on all that sand?
At all costs? Mate, they got Dangerfield for a first, second and Gore and they're paying him like $800k.Dangerfield was secured at all costs and Geelong are playing finals again. You think they would even be in the 8 without him? No chance. Richmond have Martin. Buddy was another big signing to keep the Swans in the top echelon. If we think we can rely on our bring poor players through the twos and hope, we have another 5 years of pain ahead.
Crossing the river to Sth Perth. Was a joy for me.Dolphines?
Ah...you spent to much time over there.
But but but my counselor said that we're all special. If i want something now i should be able to have it now. Any argument against these beliefs is hurtful anf oppressive. I want lynch nowWe have no financial muscle, there is a salary cap anyway, and when it comes to financial muscle it appears we are in a bidding war with the AFL which we will lose.
We have no advantage. If anything we have several disadvantages. We are not special. We are very very ordinary. The sooner we start living in that world the sooner we stop being a sad anachronism like Carlton used to be.
Yes, yes we do have a great list - unbalanced and more so poorly developed but yes the list is "close to"That must be why we have such a great list...
On the contrary - be it negative media at times you're name goes on air. The targeted market aren't gonna go "nup they're associated with Collingwood" they're gonna go "I could use that product, now shut up and take my money"Ugh.
Our "Over Exposure" these days consist of Ed's racist gaffs.
If I was a sponsor, I'd be running as fast as I could from the "mouth from toorak".
He's a free agent in 2018 and if the AFL expect everyone to believe this system works then get out the *^% way
We have a dozen or more players that other clubs would not want. How is that great?Yes, yes we do have a great list - unbalanced and more so poorly developed but yes the list is "close to"
We have a dozen or more players that other clubs would not want. How is that great?
To get lynch we will have to give up a top ten pick, a top ten player this yearAverages just under 2 goals a game.
Undeniable talent.
But?
Is it feasible?
- What does at all costs look like?
Or as Leigh Matthews would be fond of saying (looking at the deal if it was agreed by the two sides)
(That is what we get v what we have to give up? And I'd assume not going to the draft early picks)
- Does the positive outweigh the negative?
Happy to get Lynch - but not at all costs. Still paying the price for overpaying on Treloar and Aish. And underselling on Witts.
I'd rather spend the $$ on development. it's unsexy but it works
1. Aish is not on a big salary
2. Treloar is worth the cash we offered ($700k for 6 years)
3. We received 44 and 62 for Witts - which was on par for other deals that went through last year (ex: Nankervis for Pick 46)
4. Development budget is separate to player salary cap
It's been two...It's been years since we have flexed our financial muscle and gone for a big gun recruit.
Treloar costs us:
Pick 9 in 2015 was Sam Weiderman (GWS gave that to Melbourne as part of a separate trade)
Pick 8 in 2016 was Griffin Logue (GWS gave that to Fremantle as part of a separate trade)
2 years later it's an interesting debate...
This is a misnomer. How many players has it landed us in the past? At a stretch maybe a 20 year old Buckley in the early/mid 90s. Treloar perhaps but whether he came because of Buckley, the perceived list quality (at least that was his stated reason), the salary offer or the profile of Collingwood is debatable Have North landed any les big names than Collingwood?North Melbourne can't offer him the opportunity to be the marquee player at the most marketable franchise in Australia. There is a reason why they can't land a big name no matter how much cash they throw.
Howe would be a recent one who knocked back larger offers to come to Collingwood. He is now one of the go to guys for media work.This is a misnomer. How many players has it landed us in the past? At a stretch maybe a 20 year old Buckley in the early/mid 90s. Treloar perhaps but whether he came because of Buckley, the perceived list quality (at least that was his stated reason), the salary offer or the profile of Collingwood is debatable Have North landed any les big names than Collingwood?