Well at least plug your phone in a bit sooner next time!!It's nothing good. Best just pretend they don't exist.
Ten's of thousands of unread emails across multiple accounts. I don't know where to start.
Battery critically low!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well at least plug your phone in a bit sooner next time!!It's nothing good. Best just pretend they don't exist.
Ten's of thousands of unread emails across multiple accounts. I don't know where to start.
Who do think I am? Superman?Well at least plug your phone in a bit sooner next time!!
Battery critically low!!
If we lose a QF, our SF would be against an EF winner, not the other QF loser...I get us 3rd or 4th.
I actually don't mind. If we finish 4th, we'll beat the Cats.
If we finish 3rd, we travel. Maybe win, maybe not. If we don't, I reckon we meet the Cats in week 2 anyway. With the week break, I don't trust them to get the job done in the QF.
Yeah, just did that. Rookie errorIf we lose a QF, our SF would be against an EF winner, not the other QF loser...
i wonder why we don't saybut part of me wouldn't mind a chance to lose a game just to re set before finals.
i wonder why we don't say
'i hope my surgeon has a bad day'
or
'gee i reckon my pilot is due for a loss'
keep us ebola/poo explosion free and i'll back us to win
shows how stupid the whole 'we need a loss' thing isGee you have really nailed some comparable examples there...
shows how stupid the whole 'we need a loss' thing is
we want professionals to fail, so that they can improve?
people only say that because they assume more motivation comes from losing than winning. they don't believe a team can have high motivation for extended periods just by winning alone
Would Richmond rather:
1) A QF in Perth with a guaranteed PF at the MCG or
2) A QF at the MCG with a potential PF in Perth?
Well 1 doesn't gaurantee us a PF at the G, it only gaurantees us a SF at the G....
Would Richmond rather:
1) A QF in Perth with a guaranteed SF and likely PF at the MCG or
2) A QF at the MCG with a potential PF in Perth?
It can help prevent complacency.
The sporting world is different to other regular environments.
Like I said, only if it didnt hurt our position.
Think of it this way, how many teams have gone on a 12 - 0 winning streak including finals?
But as it stands we are in a position where we have to keep winning to stay in the 4 anyway.
Obviously there is a typo there... Tigers beat Blues by 40 points AND Tigers beat Lions by 40 points.Some not unreasonable results to see the Tigers finish top two...
Rd 21:
Lions beat Suns by (margin irrelevant)
Tigers beat Blues by 40 points
Eagles beat Crows by 30 points
Rd 22:
Cats beat Lions by 10 points
Tigers beat Eagles by 30 points
Rd 23:
Eagles beat Hawks by 20 points
Tigers beat Lions by 40 points
1st Cats
2nd Tigers
3rd Eagles
4th Giants (beating Hawks, Dogs and Suns)
5th Lions
If that was likely I'd be looking at other results to make the Tigers finish first.Obviously there is a typo there... Tigers beat Blues by 40 points AND Tigers beat Lions by 40 points.
You've left a zero out, Tigers beat Blues by 400 points
W | L | D | % | ||
1. | Geelong | 17 | 5 | 0 | 131.0% |
2. | West Coast | 17 | 5 | 0 | 118.3% |
3. | Richmond | 15 | 7 | 0 | 114.2% |
4. | Brisbane Lions | 15 | 7 | 0 | 113.9% |
5. | GWS | 14 | 8 | 0 | 119.2% |
6. | Collingwood | 12 | 10 | 0 | 108.6% |
7. | Essendon | 12 | 10 | 0 | 99.5% |
8. | Port Adelaide | 11 | 11 | 0 | 107.0% |
9. | Adelaide | 11 | 11 | 0 | 106.7% |
10. | Western Bulldogs | 11 | 11 | 0 | 95.6% |
11. | Hawthorn | 10 | 12 | 0 | 102.5% |
12. | North Melbourne | 10 | 12 | 0 | 98.7% |
13. | Fremantle | 10 | 12 | 0 | 94.8% |
14. | St Kilda | 9 | 13 | 0 | 85.3% |
15. | Sydney | 7 | 15 | 0 | 94.3% |
16. | Carlton | 7 | 15 | 0 | 85.4% |
17. | Melbourne | 7 | 15 | 0 | 82.7% |
18. | Gold Coast | 3 | 19 | 0 | 64.8% |