Time for a new way: Fraser

Remove this Banner Ad

JesusHcrikey

Team Captain
Feb 1, 2008
508
0
Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/time-for-a-new-way-fraser/2008/02/09/1202234237050.html

AS Collingwood searches for a captain for the first time in more than a decade, the fate of Josh Fraser will say plenty about how the famous football club faces life without Nathan Buckley.

And the fact that the 26-year-old ruckman has put himself forward for the job says much about the new and unfettered football world he sees opening up for the Magpies now that Buckley and his former deputy James Clement have gone.

Fraser believes Buckley's loss has given voice to a new generation of Magpies, as younger players clamber to fill the vacuum left by the decade-long captain and is keen to embrace a new era at Collingwood built on fewer meetings and more football.

Collingwood loved to explain away Fraser's refusal last year to remain an official club leader by the fact he remained the same laconic and easygoing farmer's son from Mansfield who burst onto the scene as an outstanding junior player in the late 1990s, when chosen as No. 1 pick in the 1999 national draft.

But his decision to quit the Magpies' leadership group during the 2007 season said much about Fraser's disenchantment with the direction in which AFL clubs — and specifically, his club — were headed in their search for on-field dominance.

"I just had to get away from all the meetings we were having," Fraser told The Sunday Age during the Magpies' NAB Cup preparation in Dubai. "And, to be honest, I think my on-field leadership benefited from getting away from the leadership group for a while. Even in my time in the game, it's changed so much and was getting out of hand.

"It seemed like we were having meetings for the sake of meetings and then we'd have a meeting to plan the next meeting and then a meeting to debrief on the last meeting. Some of the guys were just itching to get out and train. After all, we're still a footy club when you boil it down."

The version coming from the Collingwood off-field hierarchy was that Fraser's style was directly opposed to the structural discipline and meticulous planning overseen by Buckley — despite the fact the teammates enjoy a good relationship and have holidayed together regularly — and Clement.

Fraser arrived in Dubai on Thursday after an often-gruelling 2½ weeks in South Africa, where the ruckman was one of a big group of players struck down by a violent gastro-style bug.

Despite the fact that the squad arrived slightly jaded, coach Mick Malthouse enthused to waiting club bosses in Dubai about the freshness of the group after the departure of Collingwood's on-field elder statesman.

Fraser endorsed that. "No disrespect to the guys who have left the football club, but when guys as strong as Bucks and Jimmy go, then suddenly the younger ones come out of their shells and start to speak up and take on more senior roles. I really noticed that with guys like Travis Cloke and Scotty Pendlebury. It has just lifted everyone up.

"It's been a good thing. It's been a great thing. Then you've got Scottie Burns, who may or may not only have a year left, and things will change again, and again when players such as myself and Leon (Davis) and Ben Johnson retire after that.

"One thing I've sensed that has stayed the same is the hunger from the group. Last year wasn't a fluke, we didn't feel we overachieved in any way. The beauty of our position now is that there are quite a few blokes to choose from, which you mightn't have said not all that long ago."

Although Fraser insists he has put his hand up for the captaincy only "unofficially", he stresses that he would love to replace Buckley. He said he had been urged to do so by some teammates and is now one of as many as seven players in public contention for the job.

But he wanted to wait, he said, until the new year to ensure his body — which let him down towards the end of last season and also failed him in September, most notably on the eve of the preliminary final against Geelong — had not only completely recovered but successfully endured the first half of pre-season training. After significant rest, core-strengthening training and a full pre-season, it has.

"I played 18 games but I feel I missed a fair bit of footy," Fraser said. "I knew from the mid-season break I needed a rest but it wasn't possible and I didn't feel I really contributed. Probably the hardest part of my career was having to watch them against Geelong from the coach's box."

Faced in recent years with dealing with a series of off-field disasters perpetuated by players such as Chris Tarrant, Alan Didak and Chad Morrison, the Magpies already this season have been forced to deal with West Australian rookie Sharrod Wellingham, whose drink-driving charge cost the club a Transport Accident Commission sponsorship worth $500,000.

Without singling anyone out, Fraser said: "My style would be completely different to what we've done previously. I'd sit down and have a chat with them but I wouldn't ear-bash them or bawl them out. I'd do it gradually and try to get my message across over a period."

The veteran Burns, who did not play in Dubai but flew home for his sister's wedding, is probably favourite for the captaincy role, ahead of Tarkyn Lockyer, who also openly stated his desire for the role this week. Youngsters Nick Maxwell and Pendlebury are also in contention.

"I'd like to think I could run the off-field stuff," Fraser said. "I'd have to have more tolerance of the meetings we need to have but I certainly wouldn't be creating any more than we needed. I can be fairly vocal when I need to when we're playing, but I could probably improve on that and speak up a bit more.

"I do think I would see it as more of an on-field leadership role but even if I don't get the job, I will be happy to support whoever does and stay in the leadership group."

Fraser smiles at his own words when he says: "That's what it's all about in footy now, isn't it? Leadership groups."

Clearly, a Josh Fraser-led Collingwood would prove a massive statement by Mick Malthouse and the Collingwood board. Equally clearly, the football club has moved on from Nathan Buckley — and there appears to be no looking back.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

interesting read.

Even so, that article convinced me more as to why we shouldn't have Fraser as captain as to why we should.
I've got to say I'm left with the same impression. I'm not a Fraser bagger but this article does not inspire me with confidence that he would be the right man for the job.
 
Good article. Interesting views. I am all for less meetings and more football. Fraser isn’t tough enough for a 200 cm captain and not a good enough ruckman to be a captain but is smart enough. You just can’t have a captain that doesn’t win his position very often when the player can’t fly the flag with any effect.
 
You just can’t have a captain that doesn’t win his position very often when the player can’t fly the flag with any effect.

Dont understand this comment......

By it i presume u are talking purely about HO's

That is only one part of Josh's game, where a bloke like Sandilands it is the only part of his game.

Thing being if Josh nullifies the oppo ruck in terms of HO's to advantage, he then proceeds to brain em around the ground....so he contributes much more and wins his position.

What is flying the flag anymore anyway, running in and doing a bit of jumper punching.....big deal.
 
I see nothing bad in the article, except Fraser's slight naivete in speaking honestly to the press. They've made him look bad before in a small way (the "who would want to?" about female Pie fans).

Pfft. Pendlebury will captain straight after Lockyer's tenature ends in 2010

Why would we replace a triple-premiership-winning dual-Brownlow-medalist captain?
 
I would like burns as my first choice,however Burns has expressed the fact that he is not interested.
Therefore i would prefer Josh Fraser as my second choice.I believe that what josh is saying in the article is that he would prefer to spend more time out on the ground with everyone and work on the skills required to become a top side instead of talking about it all the time ,having unneccesary meetings on what to do and not to do,
Josh believes and i tend to agree is that if the team keeps practising out on the park to get the drills ,kicking and game plan put into action on the field that would make us a
much better side than having 100 meetings talking about that.
Josh,for those who don't know is a very learned person and would make a very intelligent captain,who can easily face and interact quite intelliengly with the media and interviews,no problem.
JOSH FOR CAPTAIN,TARKYN LOCKYER -VICE CAPT.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dont understand this comment......

By it i presume u are talking purely about HO's

That is only one part of Josh's game, where a bloke like Sandilands it is the only part of his game.

Thing being if Josh nullifies the oppo ruck in terms of HO's to advantage, he then proceeds to brain em around the ground....so he contributes much more and wins his position.

What is flying the flag anymore anyway, running in and doing a bit of jumper punching.....big deal.
Fraser is the main ruckman and gets beaten in the ruck most weeks. Around the ground he can hold his own or better but we lose games because we don’t get adequate ruck impact. Then when it comes to flying the flag Fraser is a negative rather than a positive. You may not think it is important to fly the flag but if your captain runs into a melee and gets felled by an opponents breath it is harder to hold your head up. To put it into context if we had a few more Scott Burns on GF day 2003 we would not have been embarrassed. Who would you rather go into a GF with when Lappin has a broken rib – Millane or Lonie? Fraser or Monkurst?
 
Fraser is the main ruckman and gets beaten in the ruck most weeks.
In terms of HO's yes.
Around the ground he can hold his own or better but we lose games because we don’t get adequate ruck impact.
When Fraser plays we win more than we lose, his dominance around the ground is more influential

Then when it comes to flying the flag Fraser is a negative rather than a positive. You may not think it is important to fly the flag but if your captain runs into a melee and gets felled by an opponents breath it is harder to hold your head up.
Fair enough
To put it into context if we had a few more Scott Burns on GF day 2003 we would not have been embarrassed.
Fraser was one of the only blokes who busted his gut all day too, he got his hands on the pill more than Burns actually.
Who would you rather go into a GF with when Lappin has a broken rib – Millane or Lonie? Fraser or Monkurst?
What a stupid question.....what does that have to do with anything?
Millane was a club champion
And if we had a bloke like Monkhorst than Josh may have had a proper path for him in football and be physically ready now to be the senior ruckman, insteading of being crippled by being the number 1 ruck when he was a kid.
 
When Fraser plays we win more than we lose, his dominance around the ground is more influential
We have always won more than we have lost. We need to win grand finals. I would rather Scott Burns lead us into battle in the 2008 GF than Fraser and by a country mile.
Fraser was one of the only blokes who busted his gut all day too, he got his hands on the pill more than Burns actually.
I am glad you made that point. Fraser battle hard all day and played about as well he could have been expected given hi skill set. Yet we got smashed in the ruck – his position – and that was the framework of the match. Burns instinctively took out their toughest and most intimidating player at the first opportunity. Fraser got smashed in the ruck and we have no chance of getting into the game.
What a stupid question.....what does that have to do with anything?
Everything. In the context of leadership Millane and Monkurst would have played like Burns and injured opponents would be looking over their shoulders – if they weren’t smashed into Epworth. I am talking about making an impact on a game crying out for it. The 1990 would have beaten Brisbane. Not because they were a better side than Brisbane because they probably weren’t. Not because they were a better side than the 2003 Collingwood although they probably were. They would have beaten Brisbane because they were MUCH tougher and better lead. Buckley aside and Burn’s efforts to lead from the front notwithstanding we had no leadership.

The point about Millane and co is their toughness which Fraser lacks. Combined with losing his position it is bad leadership.
And if we had a bloke like Monkhorst than Josh may have had a proper path for him in football and be physically ready now to be the senior ruckman, insteading of being crippled by being the number 1 ruck when he was a kid.
maybe and maybe not but the reason Josh can’t ruck very well isn’t really the issue if it is a fact is it? I have been waiting fro Fraser to get better at ruckwork but it hasn’t happened. Injury may be a factor but that doesn’t change the result. Maybe he will improve going forward but he won’t be a high leader and he wont be a powerful athlete. I reckon his ruck goose is cooked.
 
We have always won more than we have lost. We need to win grand finals. I would rather Scott Burns lead us into battle in the 2008 GF than Fraser and by a country mile.
Not in recent times

The seasons when Josh was crippled by injury, 04-05 we were shite.

I am glad you made that point. Fraser battle hard all day and played about as well he could have been expected given hi skill set. Yet we got smashed in the ruck – his position – and that was the framework of the match. Burns instinctively took out their toughest and most intimidating player at the first opportunity. Fraser got smashed in the ruck and we have no chance of getting into the game.
We got smashed in the middle, S.Black was BOG by a country mile

Burns didn't take out Brown, he tried to and failed....if anything that would have fired the lions up.

Bit like Holland on Monty, backfired massively IMO.
Everything. In the context of leadership Millane and Monkurst would have played like Burns and injured opponents would be looking over their shoulders – if they weren’t smashed into Epworth. I am talking about making an impact on a game crying out for it. The 1990 would have beaten Brisbane. Not because they were a better side than Brisbane because they probably weren’t. Not because they were a better side than the 2003 Collingwood although they probably were. They would have beaten Brisbane because they were MUCH tougher and better lead. Buckley aside and Burn’s efforts to lead from the front notwithstanding we had no leadership.
Fraser has played in two GF's and been in our best players both times.

In the 03 GF there were 5 blokes IMO who could walk off the ground with their head up

Bucks, Burns, Licca, Fraser and B.Johnson

two of them are retired, and the final two should be our C and VC moving forward IMO.

Burns would be a great leader, but i think it is time for new generation to be the figureheads

The point about Millane and co is their toughness which Fraser lacks. Combined with losing his position it is bad leadership. maybe and maybe not but the reason Josh can’t ruck very well isn’t really the issue if it is a fact is it? I have been waiting fro Fraser to get better at ruckwork but it hasn’t happened. Injury may be a factor but that doesn’t change the result. Maybe he will improve going forward but he won’t be a high leader and he wont be a powerful athlete. I reckon his ruck goose is cooked.
Why isn't it an issue?
You put a talented kid against men in the ruck and they will get smashed more often than not.....be interesting to watch how Carlton handle Kreuzer, will they do what we did and run him into the ground or ease him into footy?
 
What Josh lacks in hit outs he makes up for around the ground

Far better value than a tap dinosaur with single digit possessions

Only Cox gets more disposals
 
what MarkT fails to recognise, is that Fraser has carried the ruck division almost single handedly since the age of 18, while other blokes are only starting to make regular appearances when they are 21 or 22 and the good ones have often had experienced 26-30 year olds supporting them or leading them in the ruck.

Fraser now has a viable backup in Wood and will go from strength to strength if Wood is even 3/4 as good as many hope.

But apparently Josh doesn't fly the flag and isn't hard and isn't tough, according to MarkT of course - despite there being no evidence to suggest any of his claims are true.

So he got beaten as a 21 year old by Clarke Keating and Beau McDonald? move on!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Time for a new way: Fraser

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top