Live Event Toby Greene fronts the tribunal - Suspension appeal

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get a bloody grip and calm down. Life is too short to get wound up like that.

Ok you never get wound up about any football incidents? You can honestly say that can you? Please...

Edit: just noticed that you were the muppet that wanted to set up a candlelight vigil to #FreeToby. Explains a lot!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Last edited:
Ok you never get wound up about any football incidents? You can honestly say that can you? Please...


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

The last time it happened to me was Milburn on Silvagni at Optus Oval all those years ago, we were all ready to lynch Milburn. And to be honest, that was way worse than anything Greene has done on field.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The last time it happened to me was Milburn on Silvagni at Optus Oval all those years ago, we were all ready to lynch Milburn. And to be honest, that was way worse than anything Greene has done on field.

So you have seperate rules to me do you? Pot/Kettle champ.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
This bloke is pure scum. Absolute filth. A dog of the highest order. Weak as pi$$. Has the most punchable head in the game. There is no way he should have been able to play on the weekend.
A very, very talented footballer, but a very, very ordinary person. I wonder if this POS would have the balls to eye gouge Barry Hall? Payback is always around the corner Toby. I hope the karma bus runs you over and then backs over you again for good measure you dirty little rodent.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
It's interesting someone with a picture of Danny Frawley would choose to abuse someone online like this. Pretty poor form.
 
That you're using a known coward puncher as someone you want Greene against.

You really don't take a loss well. Have a coke and a Freddo.

The point I was making is that Barry Hall wouldn’t have copped Greene’s antics and let him get away with it. Hall was a really dirty player as well. Never said that he wasn’t. Still confused as to what your point is.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
The point I was making is that Barry Hall wouldn’t have copped Greene’s antics and let him get away with it. Hall was a really dirty player as well. Never said that he wasn’t. Still confused as to what your point is.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

No. He just goes around coward punching players back then.

Just don't understand why you would bring him up. The way you put it in that post was he was some righteous defender.
 
So you have seperate rules to me do you? Pot/Kettle champ.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Possibly I admit, but I still honestly think the Greene incidents like the Neale and Bont last week have been blown way out of proportion due to Greene's reputation and past history..

And it's nothing compared to other on field acts of violence in the past.
.
We live in the age of the Millenials aka the Perpetually Offended Generation this days.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What a coincidence, Greene's 2 victims over the last 2 weeks, just happen to be the best players in the opposition team.
 
As I posted above, the tribunal doesn't need to find him guilty of eye gouging. The rule has literally been designed to sanction any dodgy looking contact to the face, because the framers were smart enough to realise that any intentional contact in the eye region is very dangerous. You just shouldn't be intentionally shoving your fingers in someone's face, and that's the rule, not 'eye gouging'.

Eye gouging doesn't necessarily mean that the intent is to rip someone's eye socket or try to blind someone permanently, which some people think it means. Poking someone in the eye intentionally is considered eye gouging. I'm not hamming it up, I'm just using an appropriate term. You may not be intending to seriously hurt someone by eye gouging them and you won't necessarily blind someone but the potential for such serious damage is why it is still such an inherently malicious act.

I'm someone that enjoys the physical side of the game but if you think eye gouging of any form is acceptable 'niggle' then it's probably not worth engaging in any serious discussion with you, because you either possess very low intelligence or have a few screws loose. There's a reason why no eye gouging along with no biting were the only two rules in the 'no rules' era of the early UFCs (Even groin shots were banned in the first one but allowed later).
That’s all well and good but there was still no eye gouging.
 
What a coincidence, Greene's 2 victims over the last 2 weeks, just happen to be the best players in the opposition team.
“Opposition player targets star opponent”

Stay tuned to the captain obvious news network for more updates including “the sun is hot” and “water is wet”
 
That’s not what I’m calling incidental but it’s also not something I think he’s doing to hurt them. He does it as a niggle - to annoy and fluster and provoke. I wouldn’t miss it from the game either to be honest but I don’t think he’s doing that stuff to hurt oppo players, just to get them off their game.
You think eye gouging is an annoying niggle??? WFPAYO
 
"Unnecessary contact to the Eye Region" was Chrisso's charge.

Fagan said player said no contact to the eyes more his nose.

Last time I checked your eyes are separated by your nose. If the Tribunal lets him off they are clearly saying your nose is no where near your eyes???
I'm not sure what this is.

He either contacted the eyes or didn't. Apparently he didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top