Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yep it’s why Sam doesn’t really believe he needs a new fullback. Chasing of significant player was not out of need. Just out of fun.
Well ain’t funny now.
14 for Baker in a straight swap is a terrible deal that id like to think we werent on board with.Pick 14 was always going to go to the tigers for Baker anyway so 14 is irrelevant if tigers are happy with a F1 instead
Probably too early to call the ramifications of that pick trade. Tom Morris running with the snooze you lose line is a complete joke when we are apparently losing when missing out on a scenario of trading pick 14 for a midget.
This years picks are worth far more to clubs than next years, this draft is seeming like its much stronger.I don't understand this thinking? Will your premiership window have closed in 12 months? Will you no longer want/need draft picks?
Why would a first be worth the same as a better first and a decent 2nd?
This years picks are worth far more to clubs than next years, this draft is seeming like its much stronger.
Theres a reason Carlton paid what could be pick 14ish + a 2nd rounder for pick 14 this year
I doubt we’d want a future first in a weaker draft from a potential top 4 team. Time to get creative west coast.Putting the carry on aside, this probably all just means the trade will involve an F1 + other bits instead of 14 and all the carry on is over not much. Surely Richmond would ultimately be okay with an F1 for Baker and if not then Eagles bank it for a Warner play.
It's the cherry on top. Not a need.
Our defensive structures have held up well. We were one of the best defensive units for the second half of the season.
TB is obviously a quality addition and we are looking to add more A-graders but I don't think we're going to be in any strife if the deal falls through (it wont).
Ralph opening his eyes one tweet at a time
No it doesnt lmao.14 + F2 with a F3 coming back. That's what I predicted our offer would be.
Puts TB's value at roughly pick 10-11.
No chance we pay more than we were willing to offer for Barrass (14 and F3). We'll be looking to turn Carl F1 and F2 in Barrass, depends on what Rochmond willing to accept for Baker I guess (if its Carl F1? then WC gets Baker and a F2 for Barrass, what they have been aiming for).All these pick trades must be leading to something. Could it be something like this crazy hypothetical...
Haw: Barrass
WC: Baker, 20
GC: Rioli, F1(Carl), F2(Carl)
Rich: 6, 12, F2nd(Haw)
We wouldve been aiming for something back with 14 for BakerNo chance we pay more than we were willing to offer for Barrass (14 and F3). We'll be looking to turn Carl F1 and F2 in Barrass, depends on what Rochmond willing to accept for Baker I guess (if its Carl F1? then WC gets Baker and a F2 for Barrass, what they have been aiming for).
Yeah maybe a few late picks to balance things up here and there but could see something like this sorting it out.All these pick trades must be leading to something. Could it be something like this crazy hypothetical...
Haw: Barrass
WC: Baker, 20
GC: Rioli, F1(Carl), F2(Carl)
Rich: 6, 12, F2nd(Haw)
Which might be the play. If Rich accept Carltons F1, then we still have Carlton's F2 to give up - but also very possible WC would want more, in which case it's probably a stalemate. Interesting..We wouldve been aiming for something back with 14 for Baker
If we can get pick 10 for Barrass I'd be happy with that14 + F2 with a F3 coming back. That's what I predicted our offer would be.
Puts TB's value at roughly pick 10-11.