Confirmed Tom Barrass & 2025 F4 (WCE) traded to Hawthorn for 2025 F1, F2 & F3 (all Haw)

[FootyLad0]

What happened with Bowes by chance?

Salary dump, Gold Coast traded a player out that didn’t want to leave because they ****ed their cap and overpaid a guy that was sitting in the VFL every week.

Not sure why this is even remotely applicable to Tom Barrass in any way, shape or form.
Couldn’t be further apart.

 

[theiaofseed]

Salary dump, Gold Coast traded a player out that didn’t want to leave because they ****ed their cap and overpaid a guy that was sitting in the VFL every week.

Not sure why this is even remotely applicable to Tom Barrass in any way, shape or form.
Couldn’t be further apart.

West Coast are looking for draft capital, it's highly relevant

 

[THE_GUN]

If they're offering 5 years they must be very into him.

Cool Jack Graham getting offered 4 years from the eagles

Looks like the eagles must be really into him

 

[THE_GUN]

Make it your future 2nd and we will chuck in a collectors edition of the 1991 and 2015 Premiership DVDs.

Deal?

+ 5 Coaching sessions from Mitchell and done deal

 

[bzparkes]

West Coast are looking for draft capital, it's highly relevant

So why would you bring up Bowes, which was the exact opposite?

 

[amazingjoshy]

Cool Jack Graham getting offered 4 years from the eagles

Looks like the eagles must be really into him

They are?

Not sure what your point is here

 

[theiaofseed]

So why would you bring up Bowes, which was the exact opposite?

It's false logic to assume just because a player is under contract it automatically means you have to pay more, you keeping up?

 

[amazingjoshy]

It's false logic to assume just because a player is under contract it automatically means you have to pay more, you keeping up?

GC wanted Bowes salary off their books so much that they gave up a top 10 pick to do it

Barrass wants to leave WC because he's being underpaid

The 2 situations are almost exact opposites. Just a bizarre one to bring up here

 

[bzparkes]

It's false logic to assume just because a player is under contract it automatically means you have to pay more, you keeping up?

What the hell are you talking about? Bowes was a salary dump, where GC sent pick 7 to get Geelong to take him.

How is that even remotely relevant to Barrass?

 

[jenniferHAWKinS]

Barrass, pick 23 and F2 for Pick 13 and F1. Thoughts?

 

[Sherriff Incorporated]

I didn't ask you did I, I was talking to the WB supporter..

Ok. You realise you're posting in a player thread. Not a supporter thread. What you were saying showed a lack of understanding of how trading even works in regard to t he difference between contracted an uncontracted players getting traded.

 

[bzparkes]

Barrass, pick 23 and F2 for Pick 13 and F1. Thoughts?

Lol, just no.

 

[The 747]

Barrass, pick 23 and F2 for Pick 13 and F1. Thoughts?

Not sure the Eagles want to wind up with less picks after this trade.

 

[stallon]

Barrass, pick 23 and F2 for Pick 13 and F1. Thoughts?

23 and our f2(likely about 23 again) would fetch a mid to late teens pick, which is roughly where we'd expect your f1 to land.

That's basically just 13 for Barrass

 

[amazingjoshy]

Barrass, pick 23 and F2 for Pick 13 and F1. Thoughts?

Minus pick 23 and it's around the mark

 

[Hawks_Footy]

Hawks will trade fairly, pick 13 in a very even draft is a reasonable starting point.. West Coast may land a player they rate inside the top 10 at this selection.. throw in a 2nd rounder this year or next and I think that's a fair price for a 29yo A-grader.

This would be a good outcome for both parties, Hawks get a guy who rounds out that backline and West Coast get good draft capital to help push the rebuild along for a guy that likely won't be there when they're back in the window.

 

[stallon]

What happened to us apparently wanting a player along with the hawks 1st?

Has that been proven untrue or has circle work in here removed that from memory?

 

[stallon]

Hawks will trade fairly, pick 13 in a very even draft is a reasonable starting point.. West Coast may land a player they rate inside the top 10 at this selection.. throw in a 2nd rounder this year or next and I think that's a fair price for a 29yo A-grader.

This would be a good outcome for both parties, Hawks get a guy who rounds out that backline and West Coast get good draft capital to help push the rebuild along for a guy that likely won't be there when they're back in the window.

If we are asking for 2 firsts then 1 certainly won't get it done.
They wouldn't have put 2 firsts out there if they were prepared to accept 1 first, it's just bad pr management

 

[jenniferHAWKinS]

23 and our f2(likely about 23 again) would fetch a mid to late teens pick, which is roughly where we'd expect your f1 to land.

That's basically just 13 for Barrass

Fair enough. Think both clubs will be reasonable. Maybe throw in pick 30 or a fringe player also? At least you guys would get 2 1st rounders in that trade.

 

[jenniferHAWKinS]

Not sure the Eagles want to wind up with less picks after this trade.

Would gain 2 1sts and lose 2 2nds. Same amount of picks!

 

[Hawks_Footy]

If we are asking for 2 firsts then 1 certainly won't get it done.
They wouldn't have put 2 firsts out there if they were prepared to accept 1 first, it's just bad pr management

I'm looking forward to seeing how this plays out.. wouldn't be the first and won't be the last club that doesn't get what they ask for in a trade via the media! I think his manager would've figured out the crux of the deal before telling TB to request a trade

 

[Farang83150]

Cool Jack Graham getting offered 4 years from the eagles

Looks like the eagles must be really into him

WGAF

 

[stallon]

Fair enough. Think both clubs will be reasonable. Maybe throw in pick 30 or a fringe player also? At least you guys would get 2 1st rounders in that trade.

That gets it closer, as I said for total value the f1 is similar to the 2 2nd rounders wce would be giving up.
Essentially 13+ whatever you're adding.

 

[stallon]

I'm looking forward to seeing how this plays out.. wouldn't be the first and won't be the last club that doesn't get what they ask for in a trade via the media! I think his manager would've figured out the crux of the deal before telling TB to request a trade

2 firsts for barrass will be what the Eagles start at, but after saying 2 firsts they can't really go back and take 1 first.

2 firsts with something going back or a first + a 2nd will be around the mark

 

[Bestbird]

13 and 30 seems more likely as can't see Hawthorn taking a risk with a future first.

Adelaide last year a good example after unlucky to miss the 8, then back down to 14th