Confirmed Tom Barrass & 2025 F4 (WCE) traded to Hawthorn for 2025 F1, F2 & F3 (all Haw)
- Thread starter TiAn_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
This is actually not too bad. Yes I'm suprised given some of your other posts
Not sure how Tigers and Hawks fans feel but looks pretty good all round to me
Yes, as he's made the squad before.
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
Looks pretty bad, we aren’t parting with two firsts
hawkinoz
Club Legend
- Nov 6, 2022
- 1,528
- 3,540
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Exactly.. Look at the value given to other players..
24 yr old Lukosius is being rated around pick 15 at best while Crows want him early 20's
Bolton around pick 10
Eagles want Baker for cheapies
But Barrass for big overs.
Hawks should start talks with 2 seconds if talks are still to be had.
If value is already decided btw both clubs, say pick 15, if we finish higher, then we add something to mix.
If we finish lower, then eagles add something.
Basically values 24yr Lukosius and 29yr old Barrass on same level which is astounding but Hawks may swallow it since we are NOT petty like few other clubs trying to WIN trade period.
Well you can take that up with the Tigers supportes that suggested it I guess
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
Just replying to the comment saying how it looked for them and unsure from other fans perspective, i gave mine.
Barrass is a better player than Lukosius, and hes not being head-hunted like Barrass
Boltons value sounds like 9+17 or 9+10 depending who you ask
We dont have the ability to pay more, we arent pushing for finals with a nearly finished list
If thats what the clubs have decided then sure, I doubt thats the case
Barrass should fetch more than Lukosius. Luko doesnt have a position and you could count the amount of good games hes played in his career on 1 hand.
The comparison id make is Rioli. Supposedly pick 6 will be on the table for him.
Barrass is 18 months older, but a better player and plays in a position thats generally more expensive to trade in.
They should be roughly the same value.
Revealed: Late twist over Saints star’s future as bumper last-ditch offer turns trade race on its head
Late twist over Saint’s future as bumper last-ditch offer turns trade race on its head
www.foxsports.com.au
Battle reportedly having 2nd thoughts about leaving the Saints
Could make old Sammy a little more desperate if he does stay
- Nov 27, 2014
- 10,535
- 17,428
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Chelsea
Neither of those players hold a candle to an AA calibre key position player. For starters, the position is in hot demand all over the league, and one of the best ones just became available.
No one wants him give it a rest lol
Monocle
And the rebuild begins.
- Sep 18, 2003
- 12,267
- 38,832
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
Hawks fans need to get their heads around the concept, that adding DGB to the trade, actually devalues the offers rather than increasing its attractiveness.
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
This is just stupid, I am not one adding him to trades but it’s just dumb. No one here knows if West Coast have any interest or not. Either way he either doesn’t go or he would be very minimal steak knives.
Spot on, it's bizarre, a bit like getting Broky last year and some of them wanting a higher pic given because they'd added DGB to the scenario.
He's less than steak knives and the last thing we need is more list cloggers.
Monocle
And the rebuild begins.
- Sep 18, 2003
- 12,267
- 38,832
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Claremont NE Patriots Eagles AFLW
For a team like West Coast that need to free up list clogger spots on our list ( Good God we have enough already ) , to drop off one list clogger just to trade in another list clogger, now that would be a better example of stupid
I will flip the idea, offer us a better second pick to add to your first rounder For TB and we will throw Josh Rotham your way.
Just to make it clear I don't rate Rotham, BUT he is a better player than DGB, harsh but true.
- May 13, 2007
- 2,684
- 4,003
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Seahawks, Huskies, Newcastle Utd.
Yeah, really.
When you make the AA squad that sort of shows you are of that quality. Pretty easy to comprehend I would've thought.
Be a bit different if he was 32+ but the bloke is still in his prime years and has a lot of good footy left in him.
- Oct 20, 2015
- 2,126
- 2,032
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Give 29 to Eagles and the Eagles give 21 to Hawks
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
He has been in the AFL like 10 years and never been AA, fair to question whether he actually is ‘AA quality’
hawkman
Hall of Famer
Doubt anyone would want Butler due to what he is coming back from. Serong wouldn't be a bad option to add for the Eagles given he has family over there. Would probably walk into the Eagles team as the 2nd or 3rd tall back
- May 13, 2007
- 2,684
- 4,003
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Seahawks, Huskies, Newcastle Utd.
I would've thought that if you make the squad, that's your quality.
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
AA quad quality sure, but hasn’t been good enough over a long career to make the team. Fair enough to argue he isn’t quite AA quality by that logic
He hasn't made AA team thus he isn't AA quality but a very good player. Be interesting to see what we give up for him. Hawthorn are normally very crafty with trading so that's what I'm expecting.
- Jun 17, 2019
- 8,014
- 19,860
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Dude he's 100% AA quality, couldnt care what the AA panels select.
Similar threads
