Top 100 players since 1980

Remove this Banner Ad

I think Jeremy Cameron is pushing for a spot.
 
I think Jeremy Cameron is pushing for a spot.
Absolutely. He is very close. Might be one that takes a full career for me to fully embrace his standing but i did think long and hard about whether to add him this year. The fact that full forward types dont nudge the 100 goals anymore makes my judging of the them more of a full career perspective and how they went relative to other forwards of their eras. An example of this is how I only added Hawkins and Jack Roo last year despite long careers being in the top handful of forwards going round.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

My Top 100 since 1995

1. Wayne Carey (NM/Adel)
2. Gary Ablett Jnr. (Geel/GC)
3. Gary Ablett Snr. (Haw/Geel)
4. James Hird (Ess)
5. Jason Dunstall (Haw)
6. Tony Lockett (StK/Syd)
7. Stephen Silvagni (Carl)
8. Greg Williams (Geel/Syd/Carl)
9. Mark Ricciuto (Adel)
10. Michael Voss (Bris)
11. Gavin Wanganeen (Ess/PA)
12. Robert Harvey (StK)
13. Adam Goodes (Syd)
14. Chris Judd (WCE/Carl)
15. Simon Black (Bris)
16. Nathan Buckley (Bris/Coll)
17. Anthony Koutofides (Carl)
18. Chris Grant (WB)
19. Tony Modra (Adel/Frem)
20. Matthew Lloyd (Ess)
21. Stephen Kernahan (Carl)
22. Paul Kelly (Syd)
23. Darren Jarman (Adel/Haw)
24. Scott Pendlebury (Coll)
25. Joel Selwood (Geel)
26. Glenn Jackovich (WCE)
27. Matthew Richardson (Rich)
28. Peter Matera (WCE)
29. Nick Riewoldt (StK)
30. Dean Cox (WCE)
31. Lance Franklin (Haw)
32. Brendan Fevola (Carl)
33. Matthew Scarlett (Geel)
34. Steve Johnson (Geel)
35. Warren Tredrea (PA)
36. Matthew Pavlich (Frem)
37. Andrew McLeod (Adel)
38. Nigel Lappin (Bris)
39. Darren Glass (WC)
40. Jonathan Brown (Bris)
41. Ben Cousins (WCE/Rich)
42. Shane Crawford (Haw)
43. Jason Akermanis (Bris/WB)
44. Jimmy Bartel (Geel)
45. Luke Hodge (Haw)
46. Saverio Rocca (Coll/NM)
47. Garry Lyon (Melb)
48. Corey McKernan (NM/Carl)
49. Craig Bradley (Carl)
50. Brent Harvey (NM)
51. Scott West (WB)
52. Dustin Fletcher (Ess)
53. Jude Bolton (Syd)
54. Sam Mitchell (Haw)
55. Lenny Hayes (StK)
56. Justin Leppitsch (Bris)
57. Phil Matera (WCE)
58. Glenn Archer (NM)
59. Ryan O'Keefe (Syd)
60. Michael O'Loughlin (Syd)
61. Daniel Bradshaw (Bris/Syd)
62. Josh Kennedy (Haw/Syd)
63. Stuart Maxfield (Rich/Syd)
64. Alastair Lynch (Fitz/Bris)
65. Barry Hall (StK/Syd/WB)
66. Patrick Dangerfield (Adel)
67. Daniel Kerr (WC)
68. Mark Mercuri (Ess)
69. Jim Stynes (Melb)
70. Nathan Brown (WB/Rich)
71. David Neitz (Melb)
72. John Longmire (NM)
73. Scott Lucas (Ess)
74. Mal Michael (Coll/Bris/Ess)
75. David Schwarz (Melb)
76. Garry Hocking (Geel)
77. Dane Swan (Coll)
78. Corey Enright (Geel)
79. Anthony Stevens (NM)
80. Paul Chapman (Geel)
81. Brett Ratten (Carl)
82. Simon Goodwin (Adel)
83. Billy Brownless (Geel)
84. Matthew Knights (Rich)
85. Peter Bell (Frem/NM)
86. Brad Johnson (WB)
87. Kieren Jack (Syd)
88. Tom Hawkins (Geel)
89. Fraser Gerhig (StK)
90. Taylor Walker (Adel)
91. Michael Long (Ess)
92. Jarryd Roughead (Haw)
93. Trent Cotchin (Rich)
94. Jarrad McVeigh (Syd)
95. Nicky Winmar (StK/WB)
96. Marc Murphy (Carl)
97. Ben Hart (Adel)
98. Harry Taylor (Geel)
99. Chris Johnson (Bris)
100. Winston Abraham (Frem/NM)
Loved seeing Winston appear here. Loved it.

One of the best players I have ever seen, and I've seen them all from '86. Pound for Pound the greatest kick of a football, ever. Simply outrageous and wonderful you had him listed at 100.
 
Couple of players need clubs updating, for example Chapman (Gee/Ess), Salmon (Ess/Haw/Ess) and Hodge (Haw/Bris).

Love a good list though!
Good spotting but the omissions are deliberate. You will notice that Ablett Sr hasn’t got Hawthorn next him and nor does Dougie Hawkins have Fitzroy next to him either.

I’ve decided to emphasise the clubs at which they performed to the level required to be considered in the top 100. In this way it better correlates with my other list (best teams), that I run concurrently with this list, where I’ve noted the number of players each club has inside the top 100. I dont think Hawthorn deserve an extra player recognised for Ablett’s unremarkable period at their club nor Fitzroy for Hawkins’ last hurrah. It’s a pedantic choice, I know, but I think it appropriately reflects where they earned their ranking.
 
Updated to the end of the 2024 season. Neale, The Bont, Gawn, and Cripps move up significantly. Heeney and Zach Merrett sneak in and I have had an interesting re-entry for Garry Wilson who, on reflection, I have been doing a diservice to by not having him listed.

I personally feel it is much too premature/recency bias to have Heeney make this list. Granted he had an excellent year and is capable of the sublime but he is in is going into his 11th season and prior to 2024, had only been ranked in the top 40 odd players (i.e. AA squad level) once before. He's shown glimpses (ie. been flashy) but been very inconsistent, hence never receiving 10 Brownlow votes in a season until 2024 (and if you don't like the Brownlow, he's also never before been top 20 in the coaches votes). I don't think you can be a top 20 player for 1 season and suddenly be in the top 100 of the last 45 years, especially given some of the names that are missing out.

One example, for comparison, is Scott West. Almost the opposite kind of player - not at all flashy but ultra consistent elite for well over 300 games. He won 7 best and fairests (a club record), 5 All Australian jumpers (in a very strong era for mids), 4 times top 3 in the Brownlow - he was a top 10 player in the comp year in, year out for a decade and a half. I'm personally not sure how someone like Isaac Heeney can get in ahead.

If you wanted a current player to be admitted on the back of a good year, might I recommend Jeremy McGovern instead (giving Heeney more time to see if he can back up his excellent year). McGovern was immense in an under siege backline, finally having an uninterrupted year and immediately returning to his vintage best, adding a deserved 5th All Australian jumper and a best and fairest to his illustrious career. He has strong arguments (with Rance, also not included) to be the best key defender since Matthew Scarlett (who you have at 58).
 
I personally feel it is much too premature/recency bias to have Heeney make this list. Granted he had an excellent year and is capable of the sublime but he is in is going into his 11th season and prior to 2024, had only been ranked in the top 40 odd players (i.e. AA squad level) once before. He's shown glimpses (ie. been flashy) but been very inconsistent, hence never receiving 10 Brownlow votes in a season until 2024 (and if you don't like the Brownlow, he's also never before been top 20 in the coaches votes). I don't think you can be a top 20 player for 1 season and suddenly be in the top 100 of the last 45 years, especially given some of the names that are missing out.

One example, for comparison, is Scott West. Almost the opposite kind of player - not at all flashy but ultra consistent elite for well over 300 games. He won 7 best and fairests (a club record), 5 All Australian jumpers (in a very strong era for mids), 4 times top 3 in the Brownlow - he was a top 10 player in the comp year in, year out for a decade and a half. I'm personally not sure how someone like Isaac Heeney can get in ahead.

If you wanted a current player to be admitted on the back of a good year, might I recommend Jeremy McGovern instead (giving Heeney more time to see if he can back up his excellent year). McGovern was immense in an under siege backline, finally having an uninterrupted year and immediately returning to his vintage best, adding a deserved 5th All Australian jumper and a best and fairest to his illustrious career. He has strong arguments (with Rance, also not included) to be the best key defender since Matthew Scarlett (who you have at 58).
That’s not an unreasonable take on Heeney. I think I’m very patient in not elevating players to a top 100 position early in their careers to avoid the recency bias. I’m very cognisant of the influence it can have. I made sure I waited until Heeney had two consistent seasons to iron-out the ‘flashiness’ that he had but there’s no doubting his all-round game now, which adds to his match-winning capabilities. His move to midfield has also influenced my thinking, in that he is that rare beast who can excel as a forward and mid. It wasn’t a flippant decision to add him. He’s got all the attributes, is exciting, and has brought consistency to his game. However, he is teetering on the edge of this list though, so a bad season next season would easily see him replaced.
 
Not sure I'd have Winston Abraham near my top 100. Excellent footballer but probably in the same category as a Terry Bright for Geelong and there's been countless players like that.
Who had Abraham near this list? Certainly not me…

Edit; I just saw the post from the top of this page. Great skills but never in the conversation for best players of his era which is a big factor.
 
I personally feel it is much too premature/recency bias to have Heeney make this list. Granted he had an excellent year and is capable of the sublime but he is in is going into his 11th season and prior to 2024, had only been ranked in the top 40 odd players (i.e. AA squad level) once before. He's shown glimpses (ie. been flashy) but been very inconsistent, hence never receiving 10 Brownlow votes in a season until 2024 (and if you don't like the Brownlow, he's also never before been top 20 in the coaches votes). I don't think you can be a top 20 player for 1 season and suddenly be in the top 100 of the last 45 years, especially given some of the names that are missing out.

One example, for comparison, is Scott West. Almost the opposite kind of player - not at all flashy but ultra consistent elite for well over 300 games. He won 7 best and fairests (a club record), 5 All Australian jumpers (in a very strong era for mids), 4 times top 3 in the Brownlow - he was a top 10 player in the comp year in, year out for a decade and a half. I'm personally not sure how someone like Isaac Heeney can get in ahead.

If you wanted a current player to be admitted on the back of a good year, might I recommend Jeremy McGovern instead (giving Heeney more time to see if he can back up his excellent year). McGovern was immense in an under siege backline, finally having an uninterrupted year and immediately returning to his vintage best, adding a deserved 5th All Australian jumper and a best and fairest to his illustrious career. He has strong arguments (with Rance, also not included) to be the best key defender since Matthew Scarlett (who you have at 58).
That’s not an unreasonable take on Heeney. I think I’m very patient in not elevating players to a top 100 position early in their careers to avoid the recency bias. I’m very cognisant of the influence it can have. I made sure I waited until Heeney had two consistent seasons to iron-out the ‘flashiness’ that he had but there’s no doubting his all-round game now, which adds to his match-winning capabilities. His move to midfield has also influenced my thinking, in that he is that rare beast who can excel as a forward and mid. It wasn’t a flippant decision to add him. He’s got all the attributes, is exciting, and has brought consistency to his game. However, he is teetering on the edge of this list though, so a bad season next season would easily see him replaced.
I think the point being made is inconsistent application of logic here. Your list isn't internally consistent, and given the length of time that you've had (years and years) to refine it, it really should be better.

It suits you to claim, for some players, that accumulated seasons as a top-20-40 player in the league (as pointed above, that Heeney never was), is the reason for their ranking. But for other players, their flashiness like Heeney is the reason for their ranking.

I have no issue with the likes of Heeney being in a list because of his unique play style, provided it is consistently applied. But the issue is such consistent application would have players like Kouta much higher, because in some respects the output of performance over a career has been similar to Heeney's, but much flashier and much more uniquely impactful. At the same time, I would also have no issue with Kouta lower, in a list that is about accmulated average, or similar.

33/ Joel Selwood (Gee)- Produced the goods from the very start of his career and rarely did he not contribute. What an amazing leader. While those ahead of him on this list had specific attributes that stand out more than Selwood’s, none of them can lay claim to being more inspiringly committed to the cause.

The logic that has Joel Selwood as the 33rd best player, in your own words, "rarely did he not contribute", "very start of his career",

40/ Max Gawn (Melb) - Not just consistently regarded as the best ruck in the comp year after year but became an inspirational leader in finals.

"Year after year"

etc.

But then to also include Heeney here, despite the fact that his performances have not been "year after year" and there have been numerous times that he has "failed to contribute"doesn't really make much sense.

You're entitled to your list, but it really just reads like a list of players that you feel should be higher than the other, with all the biases within, rather than a list that should be refined over time, given you first published it in 2013.

It lacks a consistent application of logic equally applied to all players.
 
That’s not an unreasonable take on Heeney. I think I’m very patient in not elevating players to a top 100 position early in their careers to avoid the recency bias. I’m very cognisant of the influence it can have. I made sure I waited until Heeney had two consistent seasons to iron-out the ‘flashiness’ that he had but there’s no doubting his all-round game now, which adds to his match-winning capabilities. His move to midfield has also influenced my thinking, in that he is that rare beast who can excel as a forward and mid. It wasn’t a flippant decision to add him. He’s got all the attributes, is exciting, and has brought consistency to his game. However, he is teetering on the edge of this list though, so a bad season next season would easily see him replaced.

OK. I hear you (and it's your list). Reading that Heeney could drop out if his season is not good enough next year sounds like I might approach these lists very differently to you. I think I assumed that what players produce over the course of their careers builds up to be enough (or not) to earn a spot on a list like this. Continuing to produce more elite football once you're already on the list will see you rise further. As others that come after you produce more than you did, you might be bumped down when overtaken (but you wouldn't otherwise drop if people haven't moved past you as what you produced to get on the list has still happened). I wasn't expecting that you could yo-yo in and out and up and down the list year on year based on how the most recent season went.

I also hear the "finally found consistency" and "rare player that excels as a forward and mid" arguments. For me (as mentioned) the consistency hasn't been for long enough to earn a place on a list as exclusive as this. He's only had 1 very good year as a forward: 2022 - the only year he kicked more than 37 goals and the only year he was considered for the AA squad as a forward. He's now had one great season as a mid. I'd want to see the level of 2024 for 4-5 years to overtake many of the champions (many of them with 5+ AA's) that missed the cut. In the same way, that if Jake Stringer suddenly had a brilliant year in the middle in 2025 (to add to a 1 great early career season as a forward but otherwise a career of inconsistency with flashes of brilliance), I'd not want to see Stringer go flying into the top 100 past players that won multiple Norm Smiths, 5+ AA's, etc. etc.

Even if I put it down to the idea that you just really rate forward mids very, very highly (fair enough), I probably still can't see myself how Heeney has overtaken many of the good ones that didn't make it. Just one example but what about Robbie Gray. Gray was a gun forward mid who was AA 4 times (in 5 years) to Heeney's 2, won the best and fairest 3 years running (Heeney once) and was probably the best player in the game in 2014, winning the Coaches award. He undoubtedly has had more elite season than Heeney playing a similar role, has more coaches votes, more Brownlow votes and trumps Heeney in nearly every statistical category (at this point). Heeney may well match/surpass all that in time (and I'm not even arguing Gray should be in because there are some elite names missing out) but as I said, I don't think Heeney has produced elite level football for long enough to make this list.
 
OK. I hear you (and it's your list). Reading that Heeney could drop out if his season is not good enough next year sounds like I might approach these lists very differently to you. I think I assumed that what players produce over the course of their careers builds up to be enough (or not) to earn a spot on a list like this. Continuing to produce more elite football once you're already on the list will see you rise further. As others that come after you produce more than you did, you might be bumped down when overtaken (but you wouldn't otherwise drop if people haven't moved past you as what you produced to get on the list has still happened). I wasn't expecting that you could yo-yo in and out and up and down the list year on year based on how the most recent season went.

I also hear the "finally found consistency" and "rare player that excels as a forward and mid" arguments. For me (as mentioned) the consistency hasn't been for long enough to earn a place on a list as exclusive as this. He's only had 1 very good year as a forward: 2022 - the only year he kicked more than 37 goals and the only year he was considered for the AA squad as a forward. He's now had one great season as a mid. I'd want to see the level of 2024 for 4-5 years to overtake many of the champions (many of them with 5+ AA's) that missed the cut. In the same way, that if Jake Stringer suddenly had a brilliant year in the middle in 2025 (to add to a 1 great early career season as a forward but otherwise a career of inconsistency with flashes of brilliance), I'd not want to see Stringer go flying into the top 100 past players that won multiple Norm Smiths, 5+ AA's, etc. etc.

Even if I put it down to the idea that you just really rate forward mids very, very highly (fair enough), I probably still can't see myself how Heeney has overtaken many of the good ones that didn't make it. Just one example but what about Robbie Gray. Gray was a gun forward mid who was AA 4 times (in 5 years) to Heeney's 2, won the best and fairest 3 years running (Heeney once) and was probably the best player in the game in 2014, winning the Coaches award. He undoubtedly has had more elite season than Heeney playing a similar role, has more coaches votes, more Brownlow votes and trumps Heeney in nearly every statistical category (at this point). Heeney may well match/surpass all that in time (and I'm not even arguing Gray should be in because there are some elite names missing out) but as I said, I don't think Heeney has produced elite level football for long enough to make this list.
I like you have made long posts in this thread too and we should just admit it's a bad list.

I don't really care if someone wants to write down a list of 100 players based on vibes and feelings over (which is what this list generally is) or how they make you feel or your memories or whatever. I'm just surprised it remains so over almost 12 years of constructing a list and significant time and effort put into it.

The explanations provided over 10 pages just makes it worse because there's no consistent criterion for some players over another.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think the point being made is inconsistent application of logic here. Your list isn't internally consistent, and given the length of time that you've had (years and years) to refine it, it really should be better.

It suits you to claim, for some players, that accumulated seasons as a top-20-40 player in the league (as pointed above, that Heeney never was), is the reason for their ranking. But for other players, their flashiness like Heeney is the reason for their ranking.

I have no issue with the likes of Heeney being in a list because of his unique play style, provided it is consistently applied. But the issue is such consistent application would have players like Kouta much higher, because in some respects the output of performance over a career has been similar to Heeney's, but much flashier and much more uniquely impactful. At the same time, I would also have no issue with Kouta lower, in a list that is about accmulated average, or similar.



The logic that has Joel Selwood as the 33rd best player, in your own words, "rarely did he not contribute", "very start of his career",



"Year after year"

etc.

But then to also include Heeney here, despite the fact that his performances have not been "year after year" and there have been numerous times that he has "failed to contribute"doesn't really make much sense.

You're entitled to your list, but it really just reads like a list of players that you feel should be higher than the other, with all the biases within, rather than a list that should be refined over time, given you first published it in 2013.

It lacks a consistent application of logic equally applied to all players.
For a start, I haven’t based Heeney’s selection on flashiness. I was at pains in my last post to explain that he has moved beyond that. This alone makes your whole diatribe nonsense. I have given him time to display a consistency of output. His flashy traits are now regular traits.

At any rate, there is absolutely no reason why I can’t have both the exquisitely gifted, yet more inconsistent players as well as those with a consistent, high level output. If I wanted to make a list of the most consistent players only, the list would look completely different. I want all types of players included, but obviously, a gifted player who demonstrates greater consistency will have a better chance of inclusion.

Your attempts to find inconsistencies in the overall list is not, in any way highlighting negatives. I actually want the ‘year-after-year players, the aesthetically pleasing players, and the flashy geniuses all mixed in. That is capturing our great game in all its glorious aspects. I never argued that they need to be a ‘year-after-year players’ etc. I simply describe what attributes have made them worthy of inclusion.

So, having come here with such grand claims of superior understanding of who deserve recognition and by what standards of logical definition, why don’t you give us your list 😚
There are so many attributes to consider that there is no way it won’t come across as having seeming inconsistencies or biases. And I pre-empted this in my original post by saying the list is inevitably subjective. If you want more definite parameters then find or create a purely objective (and somewhat boring data-driven) list to admire.
 
Last edited:
OK. I hear you (and it's your list). Reading that Heeney could drop out if his season is not good enough next year sounds like I might approach these lists very differently to you. I think I assumed that what players produce over the course of their careers builds up to be enough (or not) to earn a spot on a list like this. Continuing to produce more elite football once you're already on the list will see you rise further. As others that come after you produce more than you did, you might be bumped down when overtaken (but you wouldn't otherwise drop if people haven't moved past you as what you produced to get on the list has still happened). I wasn't expecting that you could yo-yo in and out and up and down the list year on year based on how the most recent season went.

I also hear the "finally found consistency" and "rare player that excels as a forward and mid" arguments. For me (as mentioned) the consistency hasn't been for long enough to earn a place on a list as exclusive as this. He's only had 1 very good year as a forward: 2022 - the only year he kicked more than 37 goals and the only year he was considered for the AA squad as a forward. He's now had one great season as a mid. I'd want to see the level of 2024 for 4-5 years to overtake many of the champions (many of them with 5+ AA's) that missed the cut. In the same way, that if Jake Stringer suddenly had a brilliant year in the middle in 2025 (to add to a 1 great early career season as a forward but otherwise a career of inconsistency with flashes of brilliance), I'd not want to see Stringer go flying into the top 100 past players that won multiple Norm Smiths, 5+ AA's, etc. etc.

Even if I put it down to the idea that you just really rate forward mids very, very highly (fair enough), I probably still can't see myself how Heeney has overtaken many of the good ones that didn't make it. Just one example but what about Robbie Gray. Gray was a gun forward mid who was AA 4 times (in 5 years) to Heeney's 2, won the best and fairest 3 years running (Heeney once) and was probably the best player in the game in 2014, winning the Coaches award. He undoubtedly has had more elite season than Heeney playing a similar role, has more coaches votes, more Brownlow votes and trumps Heeney in nearly every statistical category (at this point). Heeney may well match/surpass all that in time (and I'm not even arguing Gray should be in because there are some elite names missing out) but as I said, I don't think Heeney has produced elite level football for long enough to make this list.
Gray was on the list 12 months or so ago and would be literally a handful of spots back. Again, my somewhat subjective take on watching players for 45 years, is that Isaac Heeney is producing a level of quality that impresses me marginally more than the consistent season upon season career of Gray. However, somewhat objectively, I needed to see it shown to the degree he had over that last 2-3 years rather than in flashes. A season of rubbish in 2025 would tarnish that view without a doubt. I also want this list to be dynamically changing rather than just based on end of career status. Heeney and Merrett are in the conversation as best players in the comp at present and thoroughly deserve consideration at this point. But I also recognise that others would prefer Gray, Wayne Johnston, Rance, or even Tony Shaw. Again, you might be right in that I’ve jumped the gun on Heeney. But his level of performance has been eye-catching and I feel like he’s found his mojo as an elite footballer. Let’s see how it pans out over the next few years. I’ll be fully hands up in acknowledgement of my misreading of this if he falls off a cliff 😁
 
Last edited:
I like you have made long posts in this thread too and we should just admit it's a bad list.

I don't really care if someone wants to write down a list of 100 players based on vibes and feelings over (which is what this list generally is) or how they make you feel or your memories or whatever. I'm just surprised it remains so over almost 12 years of constructing a list and significant time and effort put into it.

The explanations provided over 10 pages just makes it worse because there's no consistent criterion for some players over another.
‘A bad list’. Wow, how you can lay claim to being any sort of authority on a person’s take on players I’ve seen and their status in the game is quite bewildering. Every player on this list are champions of the game. All of them. And how we view their impact on the game we love will defy any ****ing criteria you or any ‘expert’ might like to concoct.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Top 100 players since 1980

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top