Krush does still has his connectionsDon't know if this has posted anywhere, but interesting Steve called it a boys club, you would think he had a fair idea what he was talking about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Krush does still has his connectionsDon't know if this has posted anywhere, but interesting Steve called it a boys club, you would think he had a fair idea what he was talking about.
Yet, Dunkley’s probably had his best year at the club. He’s found a nice balance in the role the coaches have asked him to play. We’ve got too many good mids, so unless you’d prefer some of them to play 2’s, some have had to adapt to playing other roles. In Dunkley’s case, it’s been a success.
I think the club was already pretty keen on giving English ruck minutes, so even though it’s his preferred role, it’s not comparable to any potential issue Dunkley may have.
West was really poor closing out the season, he was rightfully dropped. Obviously needs to work on some things and we should hope he’s mature enough to stay at the club, work on his game and force the coaches hand in selecting him each week.
Potentially putting a trade request in because you can just get handed a game elsewhere is the soft pea heart option and imo says more about the players soft/selfish mentality than what it does about the clubs selection choices.
Agree these three should never pull anything other than a Footscray jumper again.
VDM
Cordy
Williams
Media and fans catastrophising our year but are we any different to other teams following a GF loss? (With the exception of Geelong , we’re yet to see if this is their year.)got to be something wrong at the club.
Have massivley under achieved this year.
Dunkley considering leaving for only an offer of around 650k. Surely we could match that deal or at least be within 50k a year and offer the same term. Not many players would even consider moving interstate for that difference.
Think we must have issues behind the scenes.
West had 2 really good games and then a half dozen decent ones and a couple poor ones hows that any different to the 3 you've named?West wanting a trade has more to do with the likes of VDM, Scott, mccomb, etc getting mutiple chances before him.
Rhylee West vs Freo:
6 Disposals: 50% D/E 3 contested 3 uncontested
2 tackles
2 Clangers
If Vandermeer had this statline we'd be begging him to be castrated and never to see him again.
I like West I think he has a bright future but he had a dreadful game as was rightfully dropped.
Scott had 23 and kicked 4 goals in the VFL 2 weeks ago and if their was going to be a player in over Vanders it was him
Why? if VDM wasn't named then Scott would've been and West still wouldn't have played and you'd still complain that he wasn't getting a game.VDM had those stats in the vfl then afl but was kept in. Not arguing whether it should have been Scott or west
For the 400th time yes he was also shite and shouldn't have been getting a game. Garcia and Scott were also both in better form then West
He played 14 games this year, McComb played 15 (some were sub), VDM played 10 and Scott played 14. He had the same opportunities they had. He wasn't the 1st dropped as he played the most consecutive games of the lotFor the 400th time had Westreceived the chances of McComb, VDM or Scott then your argument is valid. He was first dropped and the last to be recycled.
Any need for you to play the man instead of the argument?Have you been asleep the last 24 mths, Chops?
Plenty have shat their pants in that time because Dunks was being played fwd at times.
1. Scott and Garcia are both this
2. He averages 3 marks a game as does Scott
3. Scott and Garcia have kicked multiple goals before too
4. Scott played as a defender/defensive winger and defensive forward Garcia also plays the same role
5. No they don't this ones a laughable one to include
So Scott has 4/4 and the only thing has over Garcia is marking.
West is a better player than the 3 mentioned by a country mile. You need to except that those with an eye for football talent don’t agree with you Foxman98.West had 2 really good games and then a half dozen decent ones and a couple poor ones hows that any different to the 3 you've named?
Geelong utility Esava Ratugoleais “one to watch” this trade periodPLAYERCARDSTART27Esava Ratugolea
- Age
- 26
- Ht
- 197cm
- Wt
- 108kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 8.6
- 2star
- K
- 4.8
- 2star
- HB
- 3.8
- 3star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
- MG
- 131.6
- 2star
- D
- 8.1
- 2star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 3.9
- 3star
- M
- 2.1
- 2star
- T
- 2.5
- 3star
- MG
- 109.0
- 2star
- D
- 9.2
- 3star
- K
- 5.0
- 2star
- HB
- 4.2
- 4star
- M
- 4.0
- 4star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
- MG
- 133.8
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
The 24-year-old impressed as a defender against West Coast in Round 23
“He’s a chance of making it as a defender elsewhere I reckon … a switch back to an athletic interceptor, he’s showed what he might be able to do at that part of the ground,”
Would Esava work in defence for us next year?
What would be handy is an extra Steve Kretiuk or 2. Hard as nails, never give in, going at 100% unconditionally.Don't know if this has posted anywhere, but interesting Steve called it a boys club, you would think he had a fair idea what he was talking about.
West is a better player than the 3 mentioned by a country mile. You need to except that those with an eye for football talent don’t agree with you Foxman98.
He tackles more sure but he only averages 2 more pressure acts a game which isn't a whole lot. Again i'm not saying West is bad at all he had lost form and was deservedly dropped and was then behind Scott and Garcia to come back inProbably unfair on West to say he's only superior to Garcia overhead. If you want to look to stats there are some others where West has a clear advantage, particularly on the "defensively minded" point. For example, West averaged 1.3 I50 tackles per game, behind only Dunkley and Naughton. Garcia averaged 0.2, tied with Jordon Sweet. Generally, Garcia had 8 tackles in 5 games. West had 53 in 13 games. They bring different things to table.
West had 2 really good games and then a half dozen decent ones and a couple poor ones hows that any different to the 3 you've named?
Well those for an eye for talent did and dropped him. Again West has the potential to be the best of the lot and was the pick of the bunch over the year but he faded out and was dropped and deserved to be. Again this has nothing to do with his overall ability or potentialWest is a better player than the 3 mentioned by a country mile. You need to except that those with an eye for football talent don’t agree with you Foxman98.
Again Chops he played more full games then all mentioned so can you please explain how they got more chances?1. West is a lot younger than those mentioned.
2. They still get more chances
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Why? if VDM wasn't named then Scott would've been and West still wouldn't have played and you'd still complain that he wasn't getting a game.
West had a couple of fantastic games but dropped off and then had a stinker, he's young there's no shame in that.
Don't know if this has posted anywhere, but interesting Steve called it a boys club, you would think he had a fair idea what he was talking about.
The fact that he thinks Scott is comparable overhead because they both avg 3 marks really says enough doesn’t it - it’s really not worth your timeProbably unfair on West to say he's only superior to Garcia overhead. If you want to look to stats there are some others where West has a clear advantage, particularly on the "defensively minded" point. For example, West averaged 1.3 I50 tackles per game, behind only Dunkley and Naughton. Garcia averaged 0.2, tied with Jordon Sweet. Generally, Garcia had 8 tackles in 5 games. West had 53 in 13 games. They bring different things to table.