Why wouldn't Richmond use one of their many picks to take a 24 year old?The problem is he will nominate for the national draft and no one will waste a top end pick on a guy who doesn’t want play for them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why wouldn't Richmond use one of their many picks to take a 24 year old?The problem is he will nominate for the national draft and no one will waste a top end pick on a guy who doesn’t want play for them.
I actually don't think that's incorrect, I think he could show more effort and be more intense, I don't think he lacks it completely though.Happy to be proven wrong by him but he lacks effort and intensity for mine
Agree it's a fine line hence i'd rather sign him to Footscray and draft him mid year if he actually wants to apply himself,I actually don't think that's incorrect, I think he could show more effort and be more intense, I don't think he lacks it completely though.
What I will say though is that there is something in being at a club that wins. It would be really tricky being a player knowing that it doesn't matter how hard you try, you just aren't going to win. There's a fine line between it being understandable and being a down hill skier though and I'm optimistic Taylor is on the good side.
Agree it's a fine line hence i'd rather sign him to Footscray and draft him mid year if he actually wants to apply himself,
Bramble types where they are squeezed out due to depth but have the effort and the attributes are the types to get IMO not guys who have questionable effort,
Just had a squiz at the North board and that is coming across strongly that he is talented but lazy
For me personally I think "talent" wise we are all set we need more Biggs/Clay Smith/Picken/Morris types in the side as that is more what we lack, genuine role players but can actually impact games unlike our beloved LaithLook as I said , you could be 100% correct.
My opinion is only based on talent , good skills, kicking and over head.
The very few times I have seen North play he always looked a player on the up in a very poor side.
Yeah, the North supporters have a better handle on him than most of us.
Look as I said , you could be 100% correct.
My opinion is only based on talent , good skills, kicking and over head.
The very few times I have seen North play he always looked a player on the up in a very poor side.
Yeah, the North supporters have a better handle on him than most of us.
I personally don't think either will land band one.Big day for the Battle/Perryman compo and how it potentially dilutes the Cats first rounder.
Would we consider Curtis Taylorfrom North ?PLAYERCARDSTART5Curtis Taylor
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 188cm
- Wt
- 82kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 6.0
- 1star
- K
- 3.0
- 1star
- HB
- 3.0
- 3star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- CL
- 0.0
- 1star
No current season stats available
- D
- 6.0
- 2star
- K
- 3.0
- 1star
- HB
- 3.0
- 3star
- M
- 1.5
- 2star
- T
- 2.0
- 4star
- CL
- 0.0
- 1star
PLAYERCARDEND
Has played on the wing aged 24 good height at 187cm
Around 80 games could be a free shot
Who knows with the AFL. I will chuckle if the Saints don't get one after all the BS they played with Battle this weak and the 'help me I'm poor' rhetoric.I personally don't think either will land band one.
Mate I’m hearing you, the system is set up in favour of the players not the clubs. The only way it evens out is if they allow players to be traded without their permission but I don’t see that happening any time soon.Then why do we have ‘restricted free agents’ and then ‘free agents’? Bailey and his manager and Geelong are making a mockery of the fair rules put in place, and our pick 7 a few years ago has vanished. This is compromising the whole transfer system.
The MLB, NFL, NBA and NHL all handle a draft and salary cap system that is far less broken than the AFL, and if the AFL's rules were in place in those countries, you'd have far more inequity between big and small clubs.Mate I’m hearing you, the system is set up in favour of the players not the clubs. The only way it evens out is if they allow players to be traded without their permission but I don’t see that happening any time soon.
I liked him in his draft year. Played some decent footy at times.Would we consider Curtis Taylor from North ?
Has played on the wing aged 24 good height at 187cm
Around 80 games could be a free shot
It is illuminating that no journalist is actually reporting on the nature of the contract that Smith will have at Geelong - wonder when they'll cotton on to the fact that a good deal should mean a good trade
That, or Geelong and Connors are keeping their lips extremely tight because they know if they let slip how much Geelong would be paying him (a million or so per year), merely pick 15 seems like nothing in comparisonIt is isn't it? Really illuminating.
They have clubs they don't question, favourite clubs and others that they bash and undermine relentlessly.
According to the media, Scott is a genius, the Cats recruiting and admin are Gods and everything that club does is beyond reproach.
We have a lazy captive media.
Yeah same. I wouldn't mind rolling the dice on him, if only to see if I was right.I liked him in his draft year. Played some decent footy at times.
I'd get him to train with us and see what we think, the easy we did with Baker (and Bramble?)
Yep - the whole point being that if we were to "rescind" the lack of free agency rights on Smith (not possible under the current rules but operating in theory), we'd get more in compensation than if Geelong were trading for him, and it wouldn't be Geelong who pay the price (losing their draft pick), it would be the 16 other clubs (everyone goes back 1 draft spot, with us getting the compensation pick and Geelong getting their player).You actually get more for the player you lose at free agency than if you get raided when the player is younger.
I'm hearing Melbourne wanted a first and half his salary off the books whilst Geelong were only willing to pay just over half and a second rounder.Oliver will be staying at the Dees
The one way nature of all the reporting is the worse part. Everything is either about what the Cats don't have to give up because Smith is out of contract, done a knee, hasn't played for a year, played out of position or its about what we have supposedly done wrong for Smith to want to ask out. No one mentions that the onus is on Geelong to get this deal done considering they have courted him for 2 years.It is illuminating that no journalist is actually reporting on the nature of the contract that Smith will have at Geelong - wonder when they'll cotton on to the fact that a good deal should mean a good trade
That, or Geelong and Connors are keeping their lips extremely tight because they know if they let slip how much Geelong would be paying him (a million or so per year), merely pick 15 seems like nothing in comparison
Geelong thinking they can have it all is really something.I'm hearing Melbourne wanted a first and half his salary off the books whilst Geelong were only willing to pay just over half and a second rounder.
Or if all of that was true - done a knee, played a year, uncertainty of his value about being out of position - Geelong wouldn't be making him one of their highest paid players.The one way nature of all the reporting is the worse part. Everything is either about what the Cats don't have to give up because Smith is out of contract, done a knee, hasn't played for a year, played out of position or its about what we have supposedly done wrong for Smith to want to ask out. No one mentions that the onus is on Geelong to get this deal done considering they have courted him for 2 years.