boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
This is why your picture was broken.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
This is why your picture was broken.
I spoke to his old man when Lav was playing VFL this year. Old man was saying he wanted to be a midfielder but that's not quite from the horses mouth so yeahDoes he?
Spoke to the bloke face to face about 4 weeks ago.
We should take rioli insteadJunker reminds me of a young David Myers
You have a very narrow view on player positions.Sure.
And Daniher 'might' be switched to defense in the future.
This. They're completely different types of players, and anyone attempting to state or insinuate that they are the same has little understanding of both players and structure.In any case, Laverde and Battle have very little in common other than potentially playing in the same third of the ground.
You have a very narrow view on player positions.
In any case, Laverde and Battle have very little in common other than potentially playing in the same third of the ground.
That is EXACTLY 'not a midfielder', particularly in the context of the comment I responded to.
Laverde is not a midfielder. It is utterly irrelevant what he was viewed as when he was drafted. What he is, is a forward, or half-forward - whatever 'term' floats your boat.
He is a forward. He is being developed as a forward, the intention is to play him as a forward - end of story.
Why do you always ignore meThere are none so blind as they that do not see.
Same "spot" in the sense both would play forward but are on the fringe of the 22, but very different roles within that area. Different enough that the decision could come down to attributes as much as form, much like picking a taller or smaller defender depending on match-ups.And potentially competing for the same spot in the team.
And potentially potential to the potential of potentially etc as said before potential is such a bs word, once its done or reached there is no limit.And potentially competing for the same spot in the team.
Just watched the "Inside Our Comeback Story - Draft Strategy Meeting", I may be reading too much into it, but there seems to be strong allusions that McCluggage will be our Pick 1.
Some quotes that seem to be linked to the player we'll take at Pick 1:
"We're fascinated by his ball movement...and his early and quick decision making" - Worsfold
"He quite possibly in five years time...could be the best player in this draft pool" - Dodoro
"And what he has got is what's between his ears...that you don't measure...it is elite" - Dodoro
Some general quotes from the video:
"If we think there's an absolute gun...we'll take the gun"
"It's an unusual draft in that, there is a fair amount of depth"
"The selections that we take into this draft, the ones that we take later on are going to be governed by what we take early"
"We don't want to walk out with the same type of player, all the way through the draft"
"Early in drafts its your blue-chip stock. Your middle picks are your upside players. And your late picks, data tells you that the best picks are the physically ready-made players"
I highly doubt it - there'd be some serious integrity issues.Can anyone tell me if you can bet on the draft?
David King would have already had a flutter if you could.I highly doubt it - there'd be some serious integrity issues.