it appears we just skull****ed the trade period my friends...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are the new North - Sloane, Lynch and now Shiel.. no longer a destination club
this years & next years first, Giants dont want players
This is the trade thread, not Delusional Pearlers, though I can understand why you'd get confusedThere's so many quotable posts on that Hawkes Board. Soooooo many.
This one is my favourite;
So many levels.
Dangerfield went for 9+28 after a 22 brownlow vote season for the Crows. Shiel is good but is a step below Dangerfield.
Dangerfield went for 9+28 after a 22 brownlow vote season for the Crows. Shiel is good but is a step below Dangerfield.
I can't see it being that. I doubt the AFL would allow it anyway.
LeuenbergerPick 8 + Bellchambers to GWS. Get it done dodo.
Not sure if srs but Bellchambers is our main ruckman. Lose him and next is Draper really.Pick 8 + Bellchambers to GWS. Get it done dodo.
I feel like he wanted to go to the hawks, but they couldn't create anymore loopholes in the trading rules to get it to work.I like that the deciding factor for Shiel was down to who could get the deal done... and chose Essendon. Coz we're the 'easy to trade with' club.
Well played bomber