News Trade Week & DFA's Chat - Non Crows

Remove this Banner Ad

So the AFL will stop other clubs from receiving the advantages Geelong get.

Like clockwork.
Im calling bullshit, that you can fit Danger, Hawkins, Cameron, Guthrie, Duncan, Stewart and Bowes all under the salary cap.

Why is the AFL media not investigating this?
 
I'd take Stack. A bit of baggage but a very good player.
We don't need him. If we were to take any delisted players, I'd take a punt on RCD in the rookie draft being a big-bodied mid and all. Low risk potential high reward pick. He finished the VFL season pretty strongly so there may be something to work with, but I also suspect a couple of other clubs like the Saints and Hawks will be interested.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So the AFL will stop other clubs from receiving the advantages Geelong get.

Like clockwork.
This is the best game in the world played in the worst competition in the world.

No other sport has such a one region bias with an organisation that bends to it and plays the key final only at some clubs home ground.

Go Norwood.
 
Im calling bullshit, that you can fit Danger, Hawkins, Cameron, Guthrie, Duncan, Stewart and Bowes all under the salary cap.

Why is the AFL media not investigating this?
I’m also calling bullshit that GC needed to include pick 7 in the deal to entice a club to take the Bowes contract off their hands. It’s clearly rigged to give Geelong a draft pick to get Jhye Clark.

The AFL integrity unit should also be investigating the spelling of Jhye.
 

AFL to consider tweaks for the salary dump​

The AFL will review the trade period to consider refining the rules around salary dumping and consider whether to extend the length of elite players’ first contracts from two years to three.

Clubs have argued for, and the AFL will now consider, a change that would require a club in Geelong’s situation in future to have to keep the $825,000 from a Bowes-type contract in their salary cap for two years, not the smoothed out contract amount they are actually paying him.

Troubled by players leaving clubs, especially in emerging markets, to move early in their careers, as well as regard for the inflationary effect of massive salary demands from second-year players for their first unregulated contracts, the AFL will explore whether the initial player contract could, or should, be extended from two to three years, possibly only for first and second round draftees.


This has been mentioned before but the issue is the salary cap floor. Teams should be allowed to save and bank salary cap to a much greater extent. At the moment the bottom team can only spend 5% less than the top team? And then everyone goes crazy when they hear Jack Bowes or Tarryn Thomas is on a huge contract. Imagine if North were spending 80% of the salary cap and banking it for big deals - the Geelongs of the world wouldn’t be able to afford a cap dump then as North could offer massive overs to all of their players and apply a lot more pressure to their list


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

AFL to consider tweaks for the salary dump​

The AFL will review the trade period to consider refining the rules around salary dumping and consider whether to extend the length of elite players’ first contracts from two years to three.

Clubs have argued for, and the AFL will now consider, a change that would require a club in Geelong’s situation in future to have to keep the $825,000 from a Bowes-type contract in their salary cap for two years, not the smoothed out contract amount they are actually paying him.

Troubled by players leaving clubs, especially in emerging markets, to move early in their careers, as well as regard for the inflationary effect of massive salary demands from second-year players for their first unregulated contracts, the AFL will explore whether the initial player contract could, or should, be extended from two to three years, possibly only for first and second round draftees.

How convenient for the AFL to change the rules yet again.

Joke of an organisation that manufactures what they want.
 
How convenient for the AFL to change the rules yet again.

Joke of an organisation that manufactures what they want.
And always in hindsight .......it's not really hard to see the possibility of Bowes Contract being "smoothed" over .....it seems the approach though, is to simply wait for the Clubs to complain and suggest changes

It's lazy .....no, inept management, by the AFL !
 
And always in hindsight .......it's not really hard to see the possibility of Bowes Contract being "smoothed" over .....it seems the approach though, is to simply wait for the Clubs to complain and suggest changes

It's lazy .....no, inept management, by the AFL !
No, it's worse... this was deliberately planned to get a desired outcome... then shut the door on everyone else.
 
Funny how quick the VFL is to crush our hopes of pick 2 for Brad Crouch....or to investigate a deal with Tippett that did NOT exceed the salary cap.
But Geelong can receive the most insanely unfair trade in AFL history. then change the payment structure to suit itself. Geelong can also clearly offer third party payments outside the salary cap.

Crown casino has more integrity than the VFL....and they were found to not be fit to hold a gaming licence....yet they are " too big to fail" so all is swept under the carpet. (Sound familiar?)

Victoria is the most currupt and morally bankrupt state in Australia by a long, long way.

The people here are SO used to the greed and corruption they no longer see it....so no use even complaining to them.

I agree with an earlier post - greatest game in the world with the worst possible administration.
 
This has been mentioned before but the issue is the salary cap floor. Teams should be allowed to save and bank salary cap to a much greater extent. At the moment the bottom team can only spend 5% less than the top team? And then everyone goes crazy when they hear Jack Bowes or Tarryn Thomas is on a huge contract. Imagine if North were spending 80% of the salary cap and banking it for big deals - the Geelongs of the world wouldn’t be able to afford a cap dump then as North could offer massive overs to all of their players and apply a lot more pressure to their list


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Well said
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Funny how quick the VFL is to crush our hopes of pick 2 for Brad Crouch....or to investigate a deal with Tippett that did NOT exceed the salary cap.
But Geelong can receive the most insanely unfair trade in AFL history. then change the payment structure to suit itself. Geelong can also clearly offer third party payments outside the salary cap.

Crown casino has more integrity than the VFL....and they were found to not be fit to hold a gaming licence....yet they are " too big to fail" so all is swept under the carpet. (Sound familiar?)

Victoria is the most currupt and morally bankrupt state in Australia by a long, long way.

The people here are SO used to the greed and corruption they no longer see it....so no use even complaining to them.

I agree with an earlier post - greatest game in the world with the worst possible administration.
NSW May feel aggrieved that you no longer see them as the most corrupt state! Surely your not serious about the Vics having passed them by.

Fortunately or perhaps unfortunately, we are likely to be easily the least corrupt state. We don’t even rip off major federal grants programs.
 

AFL to consider tweaks for the salary dump​

The AFL will review the trade period to consider refining the rules around salary dumping and consider whether to extend the length of elite players’ first contracts from two years to three.

Clubs have argued for, and the AFL will now consider, a change that would require a club in Geelong’s situation in future to have to keep the $825,000 from a Bowes-type contract in their salary cap for two years, not the smoothed out contract amount they are actually paying him.

Troubled by players leaving clubs, especially in emerging markets, to move early in their careers, as well as regard for the inflationary effect of massive salary demands from second-year players for their first unregulated contracts, the AFL will explore whether the initial player contract could, or should, be extended from two to three years, possibly only for first and second round draftees.

Of course, goal achieved, return to old rules
 
And always in hindsight .......it's not really hard to see the possibility of Bowes Contract being "smoothed" over .....it seems the approach though, is to simply wait for the Clubs to complain and suggest changes

It's lazy .....no, inept management, by the AFL !

The point is also that the AFL could have just stopped them from doing it! Make a rule on the fly (like they already did), or just block the trade.

But nup. Let it through, let Geelong benefit, then revert back to the old rules.

It is absolute bullshit.
 
This has been mentioned before but the issue is the salary cap floor. Teams should be allowed to save and bank salary cap to a much greater extent. At the moment the bottom team can only spend 5% less than the top team? And then everyone goes crazy when they hear Jack Bowes or Tarryn Thomas is on a huge contract. Imagine if North were spending 80% of the salary cap and banking it for big deals - the Geelongs of the world wouldn’t be able to afford a cap dump then as North could offer massive overs to all of their players and apply a lot more pressure to their list


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

That banking should be happening anyway. We’re not a good example because we were maxxed out as spooners after trying to lock our contending group down for a few years and then paying a couple of guys to play elsewhere. But a club like North should have shit trucks of cash having frontloaded the shit out of existing contracts. What people ignore is future commitments of clubs’ salary caps. Cats could be a season away from a pies/suns style shedding.

Clubs at the bottom should be paying a decent portion of their current cap to retire forward commitments whereas the Cats would be going the opposite whilst the window is closed. It goes a long way to explaining the quality differential of lists. The picture would look very different if you knew the Cats had 15 players contracted for 2024 and the combined cap spend was $14m. Not saying it’s the case, but it completes the picture.
 
This has to be a fake tweet. I have no idea who those players are.
Charlie Parker was a mature running machine, drafted last year ....being a mature, it was assumed he'd play some games

IIRC he was injured early ....and played no games

Mutineer probably give more info on Butler .....who IIRC has mentioned him last year?
 
Charlie Parker was a mature running machine, drafted last year ....being a mature, it was assumed he'd play some games

IIRC he was injured early ....and played no games

Mutineer probably give more info on Butler .....who IIRC has mentioned him last year?

Good strategy from the Bulldogs there. If a mature recruit doesn't play that season there's no point retaining them.
 
Charlie Parker was a mature running machine, drafted last year ....being a mature, it was assumed he'd play some games

IIRC he was injured early ....and played no games

Mutineer probably give more info on Butler .....who IIRC has mentioned him last year?
Wrong Butler mate...

 

We asked 16 AFL prospects who they’d take with Pick 1. The clear favourite wasn’t the unanimous choice​


But Cadman wasn’t Phillipou’s nomination for the No. 1 pick.

In perhaps a sign the self-belief and confidence of overseas athletes is beginning to influence Australia’s emerging footballers, Phillipou was one of several prospects spoken to by foxfooty.com.au that indicated he’d take himself with the first selection.

I like it when young lads back themselves without being a $ick or full of :poo::poo: He does have a lot of upside and the youngest in the draft.

 
Last edited:

We asked 16 AFL prospects who they’d take with Pick 1. The clear favourite wasn’t the unanimous choice​


But Cadman wasn’t Phillipou’s nomination for the No. 1 pick.

In perhaps a sign the self-belief and confidence of overseas athletes is beginning to influence Australia’s emerging footballers, Phillipou was one of several prospects spoken to by foxfooty.com.au that indicated he’d take himself with the first selection.

I like it when young lads back themselves without being a $ick a full of :poo::poo: He does have a lot of upside and the youngest in the draft.

:oops::think:
...
In perhaps a sign the self-belief and confidence of overseas athletes is beginning to influence Australia’s emerging footballers, Phillipou was one of several prospects spoken to by foxfooty.com.au that indicated he’d take himself with the first selection.
“I think I‘d have to say myself, just because I think if you’re not going to back yourself, you probably don’t have the confidence required to play in the league,” he said.
“Whether I think I’m the best right now, I would probably say yes as well. But look at the end of the day, it‘s what clubs need and I might not be the best fit for a club. But if I had Pick 1, I’d definitely be taking myself.”
...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top