![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/brisbane.png)
royboy2
Average Old Bastard
- Dec 7, 2007
- 13,152
- 15,342
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Rabbitohs, Villa, McLaren F1, ENG
Could probably award the Golden Boot now.
2024 Winner: O. GOAL
2024 Winner: O. GOAL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read that Poms now avoid Germany, Spain, France and Portugal until final if they get that far
Seems a common theme with England at the major tournaments for as long as I can recall. Largely predicated on club divide, who should play instead of who etc.
Still don’t really know what Englands plan is. Like if it does click what is meant to look like. A striker that needs runners getting in behind. Wide players that want to drift in and need a striker that can get in behind. They basically can’t attack down the left half of the pitch as they don’t have a left back that can hug the touchline. All that leaves them with most of the team standing next to each other shuffling the ball side to side with no movement.
Then you watch a team like Austria with far less talent but they know exactly what the plan is and what they need to do and it results in much better football.
You have one of the best RWs in the world in Saka and you want him in a position he hasn't played in around 4 years?The England players give the impression they don't know what the game plan is. They played Kane in the Haaland position against Serbia. But they neither played it through the middle for him to chase nor got behind the defence down the line. The result was that Kane got two touches in the first half. Kane said he wasn't sure who was supposed to be pressing.
They looked a little better in the second half against Slovenia but couldn't score. If it were a knockout game it would have gone to the lottery of penalties against a team ranked 45.
My answer to the left side problem would be to play Saka as wing back. I doubt Southgate has the imagination to do that.
You have one of the best RWs in the world in Saka and you want him in a position he hasn't played in around 4 years?
If Foden can't manage LW you are better off having Saka LW and Foden RW because that seems a smarter move. At least the drop off for Saka at LW instead of RW would be less than it has been for Foden.
Better off keeping Walker at RB and playing TAA as an inverted LB if anything.
But end of the day the players positions don't seem to matter because Garrys gameplan is absolute dogshit and no one seems to know what they are meant to be doing.
Yeah, Palmer deserves at start after this mornings cameo.Palmer was an instant improvement when he came on for Saka at RW.
As far as I know Saka hadn't played LWB before Arteta put him there. He did well, with clean sheets and assists. It's a moot point as there's no way Southgate will do this. He would rather have a right footed LB pass back to the CB or Pickford and invite pressure with a low block.
Shaw is in the squad and is a natural left back? Why not play him at LB and actually have a LB at LB.You have one of the best RWs in the world in Saka and you want him in a position he hasn't played in around 4 years?
If Foden can't manage LW you are better off having Saka LW and Foden RW because that seems a smarter move. At least the drop off for Saka at LW instead of RW would be less than it has been for Foden.
Better off keeping Walker at RB and playing TAA as an inverted LB if anything.
But end of the day the players positions don't seem to matter because Garrys gameplan is absolute dogshit and no one seems to know what they are meant to be doing.
As manager, Gareth Southgate has apparently won 4 out of 24 games against teams ranked in the FIFA top ten. Both the Netherlands and Italy are in the top ten right now.Look almost certain to face Netherlands though next round, probably followed by Italy.
Shaw's been listed as injured for a while now, and hasn't played since mid-February. I doubt he's match fit yet.Shaw is in the squad and is a natural left back? Why not play him at LB and actually have a LB at LB.
Then drop Walker and play TAA at RB. Ask TAA not to come into midfield and rather play more wide and bomb on like he used to under Klopp. Then that at least gives England, width, overlap and in TAA's case excellent delivery from out wide.
He’s not fit. He’s the clear first choice if/when he does get back. Southgate didn’t rate any other actual left backs so gambled on Trippier being able to do a job until Shaw was fit.He's in the squad though, so he must be fit.
Maybe Gomez at LB, he did really well there for us during the season. Dont know if it fixes any real problems though as again you're putting a right footed player at LB.
That's another black mark on Southgate then taking a player who isnt fit and he doesnt seem like he intends to play at all. What was the point?He’s not fit. He’s the clear first choice if/when he does get back. Southgate didn’t rate any other actual left backs so gambled on Trippier being able to do a job until Shaw was fit.
3 games in and it’s been a massive problem for them and Shaw will be playing his first game in months if he is passed fit.
I think they viewed it as an easy group to get through, and they anticipate that he'll be fit by the time of the knockout rounds.That's another black mark on Southgate then taking a player who isnt fit and he doesnt seem like he intends to play at all. What was the point?
That's another black mark on Southgate then taking a player who isnt fit and he doesnt seem like he intends to play at all. What was the point?
Yes if Slovakia/Romania also remains a draw.If Ukraine get a goal does that mean Belgium go out of the tournament?