US Election

[1970crow]

After a long drought its been revealed the dams are empty from what I have heard.

Inexcusable. But what he is referring to is Trumps idea about water from colorado proposal. There is more chance of me riding a push bike to Australia from portugal in the time between now and Trumps previous presidency to a single pipe being laid in preperation for utilising the water.

Trump had apparently brokered a deal that just needed governor of the day signature. No doubt someone he knew would have a head start on purchasing land or other kind of rights downstream, but it sounds like it was able to get up and going.

 

[adelaidecrows]

Trump had apparently brokered a deal that just needed governor of the day signature. No doubt someone he knew would have a head start on purchasing land or other kind of rights downstream, but it sounds like it was able to get up and going.

Sure he did, but the facts dont support that it would have made a difference. Without playing politics, from what I have heard is that the fire destroyed key pipes not to mention the unprecedented demand of 3 major fires sucking water from the supply and thus it weakened the entire water system and drained the pressure. The perfect storm really. I think a lot has to be reviewed. The lack of funding from LA governments is disgraceful. The budget cuts will see heads roll and there is a lot to come out on this. I will concede Trump could end up being right. time will tell.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

No he quoted an x account telling him what to quote.
Ok to be fair he isnt a complete dribbling fool like some of his mates.

"quoted an x account telling him what to quote"

What does that even mean?

Newscum is literally lying to that distraught woman in real time. Didn't you watch the video?

He literally says to her he is talking to the president in real time.
She asks to be in on the call.
He then says he can't get onto the president, and he has tried 5 times.
Then he says he has no phone service.


How do you misunderstand that.

 

[Slippery Pete]

1. You’ve repeatedly posted debunked gibberish lauding ivermectin’s effectiveness as a treatment for COVID,

Speaking of which, I did pop my head in here the other week to see you still on the soap box wailing about ivermectin being the miracle cure for COVID.

Again, receipts? I’ve posted the exact opposite thing, dating back to 2022, to what you claimed I posted.

The issue was never that it was some miracle cure….

Nobody claimed it was a miracle cure.

Nobody including me ever said it was some proven miracle cure,

Either come up with the receipts or admit you’re a liar.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Was Jimmy Carter a Nazi? Good question for senator Warren.

 

[Slippery Pete]

The second line of defence in the Slippery Pete ivermectin fanboi armoury has been to repeatedly reference its “Noble” [sic - ] Prize, which it won for its effectiveness as an anti-parasitic (not antiviral) drug.

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

Nothing to see here.

"Mark Zuckerberg says the Biden admin called his employees and “screamed and cursed” at them to take down Covid/vaccine content. "

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Is DEI dead? How did supposed geniuses fall for this "shit" in the first place.

 

[1970crow]

No he quoted an x account telling him what to quote.
Ok to be fair he isnt a complete dribbling fool like some of his mates.

If you watch the video, what was posted was verbatim. There was no word salad. If you watch it, it’s pretty embarrassing, the governor flat out lies.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

True.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

If you watch the video, what was posted was verbatim. There was no word salad. If you watch it, it’s pretty embarrassing, the governor flat out lies.

Gavin Newscum wouldn't lie.

 

[Crow till I die]

Thanks. I see the images of whole streets burnt to the ground and not a wall standing in sight apart from the larger business buildings.
I think you are correct because of their concerns for serious earthquake. Brick and masonry seem to be an expensive option.

Our construction requirements here is SA are quite stringent for building in bushfire prone areas now and with good reason considering the cudlee creek and sampson flat fires and the area of destruction and the speed they moved at

 

[1970crow]

Gavin Newscum wouldn't lie.

I don’t know who he is at all and I understand the pressure of the situation. But he could easily have said ‘I’m trying to get through to the president right now’. To claim he was literally on the phone with him at the time speaks volumes as to his level of innate honesty.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

I don’t know who he is at all and I understand the pressure of the situation. But he could easily have said ‘I’m trying to get through to the president right now’. To claim he was literally on the phone with him at the time speaks volumes as to his level of innate honesty.

Governor of California and a favourite for Dems nominee in next election.
Always a slick talker but it may be catching up with him this time. The affected areas are deep blue voter wise, and I suspect people may turn on him.

The fires were most probably arson but when officials have prioritised DEI over safety of the community they need to go.
They had warnings of high winds but were not prepared and failed with lack of resources in place.

 

[1970crow]

Wow

It’s more in your face but it’s not too different to grant stevens moaning about his workforce having to deploy their equipment and training. Blaming other areas, ‘something needs to be done, my staff are having to do their job’. Whiney biatch never comments on lenient sentencing until it’s one of his crew that was on the other end of a crime. Self serving tosser.

 

[1970crow]

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

It wasn’t until well into the rampant transmission phase (despite 90%+ vax rate) that we were even told by our health experts how best to deal with symptoms if you have covid. Paracetamol, rest and hydration. Try and find any official advice from any health dept in Oz prior to hitting the vax rate and the virus going through the population like wildfire.

Hard to maintain the fear of imminent death when you’re simultaneously telling people they just need to take a bex and lie down.

 

[1970crow]

You’re refuting an argument I’m not making, and never have made, because you can’t refute the actual argument.

To recap:

1. Doctors discovered early on that some of their patients got better after prescribing this drug (and others) off-label. This is not some big controversy, some people respond to treatments without significant clinical evidence. This is why doctors are able to prescribe things off-label.
2. A weapons-grade propaganda campaign by the media and the medical bureaucracy ensued to denigrate the drug (horse paste etc). This was obviously nefarious and completely unnecessary (unless you were Pfizer or AZ, then it was very necessary).
3. The TGA banned the off label prescription of the drug. You have denied this. But it is a fact.

All of this occurred for one reason and one reason only: to protect Pfizer, Moderna and AZ. There was no money to be made from off-label treatments of Covid. There were billions to be made from the heart-attack jabs.

In order to deny this is what occurred, you not only have to deny reality, but you have to defend some of the world’s most despicable creatures. Useless, pathetic politicians and bureaucrats like Brad Hazzard and Brett Sutton, and pharmaceutical megacorporations like Pfizer who made tens of billions of dollars from those jabs and never have to pay a cent for injuring and killing people.

Do pharameutical giants sometimes come up with great products that help people get better? Sure.

Should those products be mandated on people, monopolized at the expense of all other possible treatments, and given carte blanche legal immunity against injuring and killing people?

Fu*k no. Never in a million years.

This is obviously a fact, and because of your very weird compulsion to defend the world’s worst people you can’t admit it.

Sad.

ADL is a lifetime public servant, and worse, in health. Process over outcome, they know no other way.

 

[adelaidecrows]

More covid discussion. I was suffering withdrawals.